ADVERTISEMENT

*UK vs Gonzaga Game Thread*

Just skimmed through the comments that were posted up thru about 11pm. Kinda funny to see how many comments that were trashing our guys. Then it's all praise as of this morning. Can we have a mod pin this thread so we can refer back to it during the season?

Comedy gold!
Cmon man, shittinng on our coach and players is just being a fan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
Nah that’s not it, a couple guys started threads saying Pope can’t coach at this level, and trashing different guys saying we have no talent and ridiculous stuff.
Oh, you must be talking about the guys who are simply unhappy that Cal is no longer here. I couldn't possibly care less about what those posters think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
Auburn has also played a much tougher schedule than we have.

It's not just being down by that much. It's being down by that much in every single tough opponent we've played so far.
I wouldn’t say their schedule is much tougher but yes it’s tougher overall w lot of quad 1 games. Like 5, but we have played at least 3.
 
Tennessee in knoxville was the only game I can think of last year that was close. Maybe at state last yeta
That game where Reeves scored 37 on the road and Knoxville last year were awesome. I’d say the Kansas and UNC games for overall fun Oscar’s first year were cool. Just sucked a cal sucks and couldn’t keep it up and ruined the, by the tournament again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dontworryboutit23
It needed up being a bad take but Robinson is let’s say too passive, I don’t know about soft but physical play has stalled his game. Don’t give our boy @Dontworryboutit23 too much grief he always owns up to his mistakes. He’s definitely not a hater troll either, he’s a true blue fan.
Appreciate it man, you and Saul are two of my favorites on here along with Bbn cal. That old sports guy only posts to come at people, that’s his whole thing
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
That game where Reeves scored 37 on the road and Knoxville last year were awesome. I’d say the Kansas and UNC games for overall fun Oscar’s first year were cool. Just sucked a cal sucks and couldn’t keep it up and ruined the, by the tournament again.
There were fun individual games for sure. It’s just we knew those wins were because of the players individual talent, not anything the coach did. Now we have great coaching, and the talent will only get better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
Gonazaga is about to adjust and start lighting up that zone from 3 lol. But atleast pope switched it up.
They shoot it too well for zone

Is now a good time for me to remind everyone I said it would be a long season?

This is embarrassing. The team has quit tonight and we don’t have a coach to light their asses up. Yea I was done with cal but one thing I liked about that guy he would get in some asses
Damn dude , you’re a genius. You should be embarrassed.
 
It needed up being a bad take but Robinson is let’s say too passive, I don’t know about soft but physical play has stalled his game. Don’t give our boy @Dontworryboutit23 too much grief he always owns up to his mistakes. He’s definitely not a hater troll either, he’s a true blue fan.
That was the major complaint I heard from byu fans was that Robinson was to passive and soft at times.
 
Versus those two teams that blew big leads😎

But that kind of drives the whole point home.

Yeah, that's alarming too. For Duke and Gonzaga.

My point is context matters and I think it's something that gets lost in both human polls and computer metrics.

Let's say you are playing a game and you are up 20-25 most of the game. 4 mins left in the game you decide you are going to put your bench guys in. You win by 10. The game was never in doubt. The only reason it was that close was because you made the decision to rest some starters.

Contrast that with a tight back and forth game where the trailing teams has to foul at the end and the leading team makes a bunch of free throws and extends the lead to win by 10.

The end result is both teams won by 10. That's what the polls see. That's what the metrics will also see. But the context matters. IMO, how you got there matters. The end result is great in terms of resume building, but we are trying to compete for national titles here, not just have a nice resume.

In three games vs Clemson, Duke and Gonzaga we had this:

vs Clemson 4:20 left in the game trail by 8, We had an 11.3% chance of winning the game at that point.
vs Duke trailed 42-32 at half. Trailed 61-53 with 9:55 left in the game. We had a 6.5% chance of winning at that point.
vs Gonzaga trailed 52-34. At that point we had a 3.1% chance of winning the game.

March is a one and done tournament. You can't put yourself behind the 8 ball too many times and expect to win six games in a row which is what we are striving for here.

That's why I said no one needs to "eat crow". There's some massive overreactions like most game threads but the issues in the first half were definitely worth discussing. And you can bet that while Pope is happy they won these games (always better to be on this side), he's also thinking right now how did we get down by that much to begin with and how can we prevent that going forward. It's just what good coaches and good teams do. Get better in additional to winning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dontworryboutit23
But that kind of drives the whole point home.

Yeah, that's alarming too. For Duke and Gonzaga.

My point is context matters and I think it's something that gets lost in both human polls and computer metrics.

Let's say you are playing a game and you are up 20-25 most of the game. 4 mins left in the game you decide you are going to put your bench guys in. You win by 10. The game was never in doubt. The only reason it was that close was because you made the decision to rest some starters.

Contrast that with a tight back and forth game where the trailing teams has to foul at the end and the leading team makes a bunch of free throws and extends the lead to win by 10.

The end result is both teams won by 10. That's what the polls see. That's what the metrics will also see. But the context matters. IMO, how you got there matters. The end result is great in terms of resume building, but we are trying to compete for national titles here, not just have a nice resume.

In three games vs Clemson, Duke and Gonzaga we had this:

vs Clemson 4:20 left in the game trail by 8, We had an 11.3% chance of winning the game at that point.
vs Duke trailed 42-32 at half. Trailed 61-53 with 9:55 left in the game. We had a 6.5% chance of winning at that point.
vs Gonzaga trailed 52-34. At that point we had a 3.1% chance of winning the game.

March is a one and done tournament. You can't put yourself behind the 8 ball too many times and expect to win six games in a row which is what we are striving for here.

That's why I said no one needs to "eat crow". There's some massive overreactions like most game threads but the issues in the first half were definitely worth discussing. And you can bet that while Pope is happy they won these games (always better to be on this side), he's also thinking right now how did we get down by that much to begin with and how can we prevent that going forward. It's just what good coaches and good teams do. Get better in additional to winning.
Excellent response as usual
And I agree Mark will work with the team to help
Prevent that situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The_Answer1313
But that kind of drives the whole point home.

Yeah, that's alarming too. For Duke and Gonzaga.

My point is context matters and I think it's something that gets lost in both human polls and computer metrics.

Let's say you are playing a game and you are up 20-25 most of the game. 4 mins left in the game you decide you are going to put your bench guys in. You win by 10. The game was never in doubt. The only reason it was that close was because you made the decision to rest some starters.

Contrast that with a tight back and forth game where the trailing teams has to foul at the end and the leading team makes a bunch of free throws and extends the lead to win by 10.

The end result is both teams won by 10. That's what the polls see. That's what the metrics will also see. But the context matters. IMO, how you got there matters. The end result is great in terms of resume building, but we are trying to compete for national titles here, not just have a nice resume.

In three games vs Clemson, Duke and Gonzaga we had this:

vs Clemson 4:20 left in the game trail by 8, We had an 11.3% chance of winning the game at that point.
vs Duke trailed 42-32 at half. Trailed 61-53 with 9:55 left in the game. We had a 6.5% chance of winning at that point.
vs Gonzaga trailed 52-34. At that point we had a 3.1% chance of winning the game.

March is a one and done tournament. You can't put yourself behind the 8 ball too many times and expect to win six games in a row which is what we are striving for here.

That's why I said no one needs to "eat crow". There's some massive overreactions like most game threads but the issues in the first half were definitely worth discussing. And you can bet that while Pope is happy they won these games (always better to be on this side), he's also thinking right now how did we get down by that much to begin with and how can we prevent that going forward. It's just what good coaches and good teams do. Get better in additional to winning.
That was a great response with some very valid points. But when we mention context, I think you have to put in the context that the first game against Duke is the first time this team had played together and then the game against Gonzaga we didn’t have our starting point guarf who literally drives the team so I believe in both of those games the situations were such that it took a while for them to get into the flow, not only against the other team, but with each other, but the adjustments were made. However, the Clemson game once they realized they weren’t hitting their shots adjustment should’ve been made much sooner and that game I was more concerned about than the other two not just because we lost, but because adjustments just did not seem to be made for the poor shooting.
 
That was a great response with some very valid points. But when we mention context, I think you have to put in the context that the first game against Duke is the first time this team had played together and then the game against Gonzaga we didn’t have our starting point guarf who literally drives the team so I believe in both of those games the situations were such that it took a while for them to get into the flow, not only against the other team, but with each other, but the adjustments were made. However, the Clemson game once they realized they weren’t hitting their shots adjustment should’ve been made much sooner and that game I was more concerned about than the other two not just because we lost, but because adjustments just did not seem to be made for the poor shooting.
Another excellent post
Mark himself said he did not adjust correctly to compensate for that. He got too caught up in making sure key players did not foul out. So it was a learning experience for him as well
I like that he took that responsibility as a coach..
 
  • Like
Reactions: KYFOSSIL
That was a great response with some very valid points. But when we mention context, I think you have to put in the context that the first game against Duke is the first time this team had played together and then the game against Gonzaga we didn’t have our starting point guarf who literally drives the team so I believe in both of those games the situations were such that it took a while for them to get into the flow, not only against the other team, but with each other, but the adjustments were made. However, the Clemson game once they realized they weren’t hitting their shots adjustment should’ve been made much sooner and that game I was more concerned about than the other two not just because we lost, but because adjustments just did not seem to be made for the poor shooting.

Totally. And in the grand scheme of things we are talking about just three games. Extremely small sample to really base anything on.

No doubt. This was definitely impressive. And I think it really shows the experience this team had coming into the season. In the Duke game, we were outplayed a large majority that game. We executed down the stretch and Duke didn't. We are going to be in a TON of close games in conference play. Games that are going to come down to single possessions and who executes at the end. So this is encouraging.

I definitely do not want to diminish what's been accomplished here. It's two wins vs top 10 teams. Maybe even top 5 teams when it's all said and done. It's been a long long time since a UK team has looked this good this early in a season.

I guess I'm just thinking bigger here. I know a lot came into this season thinking ok we'll be good but this season was kind of a bridge year. After 9 games, I don't really think that anymore. I think this team is a potential contender.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KYFOSSIL
It needed up being a bad take but Robinson is let’s say too passive, I don’t know about soft but physical play has stalled his game. Don’t give our boy @Dontworryboutit23 too much grief he always owns up to his mistakes. He’s definitely not a hater troll either, he’s a true blue fan.

A real fan (debatable) that said he didn't have any respect for older people. When asked if that was true he said it was. Crappy.
 
Last edited:
Y’all you may think I’m crazy but I think this win is bigger than the Duke win for us
We were coming off a loss, without our starting pg, then without our backup pg down the stretch. Came back from 18 down to win on a DEFENSIVE play in OT
That’s freaking amazing to me
That’s probably right. Not just because of missing Butler.

The Duke game was playing a team like us. They might have more individual talent but they were mostly new to each other too.

Our maturity won out more than physical talent.

The Gonzaga team was almost the same team as last year. Well coached. They know how to play together. And the first half showed. They rocked us back on our heels. Playing basically at home.


Out guys still don’t fully grasp the system. They still don’t know how to play with each other.

To just throw away that awful, embarrassing first half and take it to Gonzaga was just too impressive to describe.

Just scratching the surface of what they will become. And now they have the confidence to not back down from anyone.

There’s something special about this team.

It’s a true team. Pope and staff deserve a ton of credit.

And so do the players.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT