ADVERTISEMENT

UK Coaches records against Ole Miss

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
8,987
113
Coach Cal: 6-1. 86% winning percentage.
Coach Drunk: 1-1. 50% winning percentage.
Coach Good Guy: 11-2. 85% winning percentage.
Coach Traitor: 9-2. 82% winning percentage.
Coach Probation: 8-2. 80% winning percentage.
Coach Hall: 27-3. 90% winning percentage.
Coach Rupp: 37-0. 100% winning percentage.
Others: 3-2. 60% winning percentage.

Total: 102-13. 89% winning percentage.
 
Originally posted by wild mandu:
Look at Coach Hall with the slaughter. DAYUM.
Coach Rupp laughs at that weak 90% stuff.

And
laugh.r191677.gif
at those nicknames.
This post was edited on 1/6 4:22 PM by FiveStarCat
 
Originally posted by maverick1:

Originally posted by wild mandu:
Look at Coach Hall with the slaughter. DAYUM.
confused0007.r191677.gif


Seems like I remember reading somewhere that 100% > 90%
Seeing a coach with a 37-0, 100% record is like dividing by zero. It just doesn't compute. If he was 36-1, it would have been more impressive because we would be able to comprehend it.
 
Well, yeah, but it's Rupp. I mean, I expected it, didn't you?

He could've taught me how to play basketball.
 
This is not the university of percentages.

And thats a really bad post.



This post was edited on 1/6 4:46 PM by .S&C.

On the rocks.
 
Originally posted by FiveStarCat:
Seeing a coach with a 37-0, 100% record is like dividing by zero. It just doesn't compute. If he was 36-1, it would have been more impressive because we would be able to comprehend it.
Someone told me one time that anything divided by zero results in a very large positive number.

Their reasoning was that dividing two numbers is the same as multiplying the numerator by the reciprocal of the denominator. If you then make the denominator itself a fraction that is as close to zero as you can make it -- say, for instance, a number like 1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 -- when you reciprocate it and multiply it by the numerator then you get a really huge number (e.g. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 in my example).

post-28669-scanners-head-explosion-gif-mi-O2Jc.gif
 
Originally posted by maverick1:


Originally posted by FiveStarCat:

Seeing a coach with a 37-0, 100% record is like dividing by zero. It just doesn't compute. If he was 36-1, it would have been more impressive because we would be able to comprehend it.
Someone told me one time that anything divided by zero results in a very large positive number.

Their reasoning was that dividing two numbers is the same as multiplying the numerator by the reciprocal of the denominator. If you then make the denominator itself a fraction that is as close to zero as you can make it -- say, for instance, a number like 1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 -- when you reciprocate it and multiply it by the numerator then you get a really huge number (e.g. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 in my example).

ec
Brayne Hurtz. I haz it.
 
When I got down to Sutton I did contemplate labeling him "Coach Drunk SR" and going back to G and labeling "Coach Drunk II or Coach Drunk JR"
laugh.r191677.gif


I was actually impressed the Tubster keeping a respectable record against Ole Miss. He brought UK down in so many ways, but not even he could screw up the Ole Miss record.

As for G, much like Pitino at UL against UK, Ole Miss is like, Thank God for Coach G. They can look back at those two seasons as years of glory in this "rivalry" and such.

This post was edited on 1/6 5:34 PM by UKWildcats#8
 
The only disappointing game Tubby lost to Ole Miss was on Valentine's Day in 1998. I remember how pissed my girlfriend (now wife) was that we lost that afternoon game at Rupp, because it was going to ruin my mood for that night.

HOWEVER, we didn't lose a game the rest of the way on the way to the National Championship. So not that bad after all.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT