ADVERTISEMENT

Tulane

The legend Jon Sumrall...largely overexaggerated.

Florida completely turning around their season and program under Napier is impressive though.
Nah. Too harsh.

Can’t judge on this game without his standout qb. Overall record is outstanding and is a National Champ.

Tulane vs Fla is never a fair fight.

Sumrall is the real deal.
 
The legend Jon Sumrall...largely overexaggerated.

Florida completely turning around their season and program under Napier is impressive though.
in fairness, the turnaround is due to 3-4 players, mostly true freshman. I'd contend the turnaround is due to NIL and not sunbelt billy. JMO.

But I liked Ware's comment at the end ... if a player transfers, then they lose a year of eligibility. Simple solution. Two ways that could be implemented. First, as it used to be and second, say a player transfers after he plays in 24, he plays in 25 and has one more year remaining. If he transfers again, then he is out. So basically one "freebie" transfer. Now if he redshirts in 24 and transfers, then he comes in as a sophomore. If he transfers again, he is a final year junior. I know people will hate that, but I like it ... maybe would stop this insanity. The current system is worse than the pros because every player is a FA every single year. At least the pros can sign contracts for a few years.
 
in fairness, the turnaround is due to 3-4 players, mostly true freshman. I'd contend the turnaround is due to NIL and not sunbelt billy. JMO.

But I liked Ware's comment at the end ... if a player transfers, then they lose a year of eligibility. Simple solution. Two ways that could be implemented. First, as it used to be and second, say a player transfers after he plays in 24, he plays in 25 and has one more year remaining. If he transfers again, then he is out. So basically one "freebie" transfer. Now if he redshirts in 24 and transfers, then he comes in as a sophomore. If he transfers again, he is a final year junior. I know people will hate that, but I like it ... maybe would stop this insanity. The current system is worse than the pros because every player is a FA every single year. At least the pros can sign contracts for a few years.
This would probably be collusion in violation of antitrust statutes. It would benefit member institutions and limit the freedom of movement of players. NCAA athletes do not have a collective bargaining agreement like the NFL.
 
This would probably be collusion in violation of antitrust statutes. It would benefit member institutions and limit the freedom of movement of players. NCAA athletes do not have a collective bargaining agreement like the NFL.
If so, then it is worse than a semi-pro league.
 
in fairness, the turnaround is due to 3-4 players, mostly true freshman. I'd contend the turnaround is due to NIL and not sunbelt billy. JMO.

But I liked Ware's comment at the end ... if a player transfers, then they lose a year of eligibility. Simple solution. Two ways that could be implemented. First, as it used to be and second, say a player transfers after he plays in 24, he plays in 25 and has one more year remaining. If he transfers again, then he is out. So basically one "freebie" transfer. Now if he redshirts in 24 and transfers, then he comes in as a sophomore. If he transfers again, he is a final year junior. I know people will hate that, but I like it ... maybe would stop this insanity. The current system is worse than the pros because every player is a FA every single year. At least the pros can sign contracts for a few years.
That’s never going to happen. It would 100% go against the court ruling.
 
I am not a Stoops fan, but I don’t understand the obsession with Sumrall. He is literally just Stoops but younger, with pretty much of most the same problems. I’d rather swing for the fences on a new coach than take a walk.
 
That’s never going to happen. It would 100% go against the court ruling.
Do court rulings mean anything anymore? The Supreme Court told O’Biden he couldn’t continue with student debt forgiveness but he’s doing it anyway and nobody is doing anything about it. Why can’t the NCAA snub their nose as well?
 
Tulane's 3000 yd QB did not play in the game, already transferred to Duke.
So. The back up played in 11 games this year and was very solid. Florida had some key defensive players out and a couple offensive. They straight up boat raced Tulane. They could have played 2 QBs at the same time and it would not have mattered. Tulane is lucky Florida kicked 3 FGs in the 1st half and DJ threw two picks or it would have been 30/35 - 0 at the half. BOTH games last night was complete mismatches.
 
Kentucky needs a coach who is an offense play caller so that at least the offense can be consistent from year to year in spite of the movement of coordinators. Sumrall is a good coach but does not run an offense. Someone like Stein from Oregon would likely be a better answer . Even the younger Brohm would make more sense :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Baller 24
Sumrall's team has really looked bad the last 3 games. Not sure he is the answer to fix our problems.
 
Kentucky needs a coach who is an offense play caller so that at least the offense can be consistent from year to year in spite of the movement of coordinators. Sumrall is a good coach but does not run an offense. Someone like Stein from Oregon would likely be a better answer . Even the younger Brohm would make more sense :)
It’s more about an offensive philosophy to me. You don’t have to have a HC with a background on the offensive side of the ball, but they need to embrace an offensive philosophy that can put points on the board, setting themselves up for a sustainable offense when coordinators move on as you mention.

Dan Lanning and Kirby Smart are 1-2 right now and both were DC’s. Saban was a defensive guy and finally changed his mindset on offense and did it through multiple coordinators.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cat_Man_Blue
Kentucky needs a coach who is an offense play caller so that at least the offense can be consistent from year to year in spite of the movement of coordinators. Sumrall is a good coach but does not run an offense. Someone like Stein from Oregon would likely be a better answer . Even the younger Brohm would make more sense :)
Stein and Brain Brohm have no HC experience.
 
Stein and Brain Brohm have no HC experience.
Neither did Stoops, at the time we hired him, but he was a good hire. Was, anyway. Realistically, a non blueblood program like ours will rarely be able to attract a top head coach at a P4 level, so it's usually either a top head coach at a midmajor level or a top coordinator at the P4 level. The success rate for either option is about even.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT