Tulane

[Mulder14]

Jon sumerall and Tulane on espn2 now

 

[CUJO_1970]

Tulane would beat Kentucky worse than Vanderbilt beat Kentucky.

It’s time to bring Sumrall home where he belongs.

 

[oldsports_]

What a shitshow. 26-0, no offense, no defense

 

[YaketySax]

Just saw UF has 20+ first downs and Tulane has 7. Tulane did not finish the season strong.

 

[K86]

The future of college bowl games. Good teams lose key players to the portal and then look terrible. There has to be changes to the portal rules.

 

[mrschwump]

Tulane's 3000 yd QB did not play in the game, already transferred to Duke.

 

[BlueTick2]

The future of college bowl games. Good teams lose key players to the portal and then look terrible. There has to be changes to the portal rules.

Why would any coach develop a player only to have them be bought out the next season by another team?

 

[UKWildcats1987]

Tulane's 3000 yd QB did not play in the game, already transferred to Duke.

They would have lost anyways but may have made it respectable.

 

[truebluewildcat]

The legend Jon Sumrall...largely overexaggerated.

Florida completely turning around their season and program under Napier is impressive though.

 

[Kybluedude]

The legend Jon Sumrall...largely overexaggerated.

Florida completely turning around their season and program under Napier is impressive though.

Nah. Too harsh.

Can’t judge on this game without his standout qb. Overall record is outstanding and is a National Champ.

Tulane vs Fla is never a fair fight.

Sumrall is the real deal.

 

[TOMCATS1990]

While Sumrall would be a vast improvement over Stoops, I personally think we can go get a better candidate.

 

[Lost In FL]

The legend Jon Sumrall...largely overexaggerated.

Florida completely turning around their season and program under Napier is impressive though.

in fairness, the turnaround is due to 3-4 players, mostly true freshman. I'd contend the turnaround is due to NIL and not sunbelt billy. JMO.

But I liked Ware's comment at the end ... if a player transfers, then they lose a year of eligibility. Simple solution. Two ways that could be implemented. First, as it used to be and second, say a player transfers after he plays in 24, he plays in 25 and has one more year remaining. If he transfers again, then he is out. So basically one "freebie" transfer. Now if he redshirts in 24 and transfers, then he comes in as a sophomore. If he transfers again, he is a final year junior. I know people will hate that, but I like it ... maybe would stop this insanity. The current system is worse than the pros because every player is a FA every single year. At least the pros can sign contracts for a few years.

 

[UKSouthpaw]

in fairness, the turnaround is due to 3-4 players, mostly true freshman. I'd contend the turnaround is due to NIL and not sunbelt billy. JMO.

But I liked Ware's comment at the end ... if a player transfers, then they lose a year of eligibility. Simple solution. Two ways that could be implemented. First, as it used to be and second, say a player transfers after he plays in 24, he plays in 25 and has one more year remaining. If he transfers again, then he is out. So basically one "freebie" transfer. Now if he redshirts in 24 and transfers, then he comes in as a sophomore. If he transfers again, he is a final year junior. I know people will hate that, but I like it ... maybe would stop this insanity. The current system is worse than the pros because every player is a FA every single year. At least the pros can sign contracts for a few years.

This would probably be collusion in violation of antitrust statutes. It would benefit member institutions and limit the freedom of movement of players. NCAA athletes do not have a collective bargaining agreement like the NFL.

 

[YaketySax]

I wish Sumrall had gotten the UNC job. Would like to see him prove it at P5 level

 

[Lost In FL]

This would probably be collusion in violation of antitrust statutes. It would benefit member institutions and limit the freedom of movement of players. NCAA athletes do not have a collective bargaining agreement like the NFL.

If so, then it is worse than a semi-pro league.

 

[bthaunert]

in fairness, the turnaround is due to 3-4 players, mostly true freshman. I'd contend the turnaround is due to NIL and not sunbelt billy. JMO.

But I liked Ware's comment at the end ... if a player transfers, then they lose a year of eligibility. Simple solution. Two ways that could be implemented. First, as it used to be and second, say a player transfers after he plays in 24, he plays in 25 and has one more year remaining. If he transfers again, then he is out. So basically one "freebie" transfer. Now if he redshirts in 24 and transfers, then he comes in as a sophomore. If he transfers again, he is a final year junior. I know people will hate that, but I like it ... maybe would stop this insanity. The current system is worse than the pros because every player is a FA every single year. At least the pros can sign contracts for a few years.

That’s never going to happen. It would 100% go against the court ruling.

 

[UKWildcats1987]

I wish Sumrall had gotten the UNC job. Would like to see him prove it at P5 level

It's a power 2. Acc and big 12 are midmajor conferences by comparison.

 

[Lost In FL]

That’s never going to happen. It would 100% go against the court ruling.

Like I said, it is no better than a semi-pro league then. Schools should use 2 or 3 year contracts for NIL.