Originally posted by Rhavicc:
Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:
Originally posted by USMC Cat:
Our class will be ranked 30-40.
That puts us in with Baylor, OK St, Nebraska, TCU, NC St, Georgia Tech, Louisville, West Virginia, Arizona.
The sky is not falling no matter how many times posters say it on this board.
Where are all the SEC teams in those rankings? I don't see any USMC. UL is irrelevant to UK's success, and the others you listed sure as hell are.
Quit burying your head in the sand and accepting the idea that the SEC is some unstoppable monster when you don't have top 20 classes every year, because it is not true.
It. Is. Not. True.
It. Is. Not. True.
Last season, I would bet my house that TCU (who historically gets worse recruiting classes than us) would blister 90% of the SEC.
The one team that could beat TCU? Baylor, who gets similar recruits to us. Who beat Baylor during the season? West Virginia, who gets worse recruits than us, and plus, now we have their OC. Not to mention the struggle that Alabama had against them.
Wisconsin beat Auburn, at look at the recruits that Wisconsin gets, and has been getting.
Fact of the matter is, you do
not need top 20 recruiting classes every year to compete in the SEC. Other teams do a lot more with a lot less. A lot of teams do a lot less with a lot more as well, I mean, look at Miami for example. The recruiting classes that they get, and they barely pan out in the ACC.
Development, and playcalling is
huge, and we'll see how our coaches do in that regard. I'm confident in the ability of our staff. Dawson has built up an average QB in Clint Trickett, and turned him into a Heisman candidate up until Trickett got his final concussion.
We'll see what our best recruits, our new, up-tempo offense, our likely preseason All-SEC QB, our uber talented RB, and talented, quick, big receivers, our experienced, bigger, stronger offense and defense can all do. We have the pieces, lets produce.