Woof. Hope Z man at least got dinner and a movie first.
Ok, but that wasn’t right after my post.I’m not wiping your arse for you, but here 🤦♂️
Does this include minerals in Donbas and Crimea?
OK, but why are you singling out aid to just Ukraine?I’m just glad Zelensky is standing firm in his position that my son and future grandkids should have to pay off the money we borrowed and gave to him to blow, not Ukrainians. Cocksucker.
$40 trillion of debt. $1 plus trillion per year being extracted from the US economy (or compounding the borrowing problem) just to pay interest on the existing debt.
And people are bitching about Ukraine shouldering some of the burden.
OK, but why are you singling out aid to just Ukraine?
You missed the point. Sure discuss Ukraine here. But you act like it's the only place we shouldn't be spending on helping other countries. That I don't get. If so, why only not there?Why am I discussing Ukraine in a thread about Ukraine where a sticking point in ending the war in Ukraine is Ukraine agreeing to incentivize us into providing future support for Ukraine?
In this thread, you’re asking why I’m discussing Ukraine?
One statement is factual. The rest is made up.VH is a boomer who thinks it’s still the Cold War. Pay him no mind. Hank on the other hand….
You missed the point. Sure discuss Ukraine here. But you act like it's the only place we shouldn't be spending on helping other countries. That I don't get. If so, why only not there?
But if you're against spending helping any other countries, please state that. I don't get the Red Sea/Gulf of Aden/Arabian Sea efforts.
I don't recall any of it being called a loan.
Another pile of steaming shit left by Biden and his band of idiot interns.
This is just stupid. No more American aid there. Let Europe fund it.
Ok, but that wasn’t right after my post.
Zelensky was correct re: loan v grant. It was definitely a grant. Our lunatic leaders thought we should give them a blank check. Insanity!
Zelensky was correct re: loan v grant. It was definitely a grant. Our lunatic leaders thought we should give them a blank check. Insanity!
Because Ukraine is part or Europe, with shitloads of democratic western countries who can get off their ass and put money forth. Oh the EU is paying as much as the US? Cool, anyway, it's THEIR continent...how important is it to them, pay double.You missed the point. Sure discuss Ukraine here. But you act like it's the only place we shouldn't be spending on helping other countries. That I don't get. If so, why only not there?
But if you're against spending helping any other countries, please state that. I don't get the Red Sea/Gulf of Aden/Arabian Sea efforts.
Magic Johnson?Take a guess who I was replying to in that post?
Interesting that so many here want nothing to do with Ukraine, yet their god Trump wants to involve us there for the long term with this minerals things & I'm not hearing complaints. I mean do you want the US self-sufficient or dependent on an unstable country half the world away?
I'm not. But isolationists want us to produce our own stuffAre you suggesting that an agreement for minerals that are necessary for the energy and tech needs of our world is bad for the U.S.?
Are you saying having Ukraine as a partner with the U.S. is bad for Ukraine or good for Russia?
Are you saying that only other countries should get a return on their investment?
Just fill us in without the weak attempts to demean.
I'm saying why do it Ukraine when isolationists want us out of there & horrors, being there could offend Putin. Why isn't a big war risk?Are you suggesting that an agreement for minerals that are necessary for the energy and tech needs of our world is bad for the U.S.?
I'm saying why do isolationists all of sudden want the US involved with Ukraine vs. screaming for us to get out for years & years.Are you saying having Ukraine as a partner with the U.S. is bad for Ukraine or good for Russia?
What investment?Are you saying that only other countries should get a return on their investment?
What's demeaning to those that wanted us out of Ukraine so badly have turned around and are thrilled we'll be there for decades. Really two-faced.Just fill us in without the weak attempts to demean.
Obviously option 1a would have been to never get involved. That ship sailed.
False. Just not let Ukraine go as your ilk have been for 3+ years.Since you neocons and warmongers
Yea, so now let's risk American lives in Ukraine so that we get money that we aren't owed. It's always about $ with you, isn't it? I mean Ukraine has been worthless real estate for 3 years & let's get away from that hell hole, but now with $ signs, it's just great !!Now our options are, (1) fund the war into perpetuity with no plan, (2) US boots on the ground, (3) walk away with nothing other than $200 billion in I need to pay off or (4) make Ukraine pay is back for the money we gave them.
The choice is obvious. The ultimate outcome was always obvious other than the possibility of being paid back.
Zelensky has done nothing wrong. NATO hasn't been pitching in because Ukraine isn't part of NATO. Ukraine has done nothing wrong to the US. Your gripe should be with Trump.I’m just glad Zelensky is standing firm in his position that my son and future grandkids should have to pay off the money we borrowed and gave to him to blow, not Ukrainians. Cocksucker.
$40 trillion of debt. $1 plus trillion per year being extracted from the US economy (or compounding the borrowing problem) just to pay interest on the existing debt.
And people are bitching about Ukraine shouldering some of the burden.