ADVERTISEMENT

The Ukraine war. (Yes, we'll mind our manners)

Ukraine's not a vital interest of the US. As much as you all want it to be, it just isn't. Since I'm human, I just don't want people to die. End the war.
 
I firmly believe that every dollar spent helping Ukraine bog down the Russians is a dollar that makes the Chinese hesitant about invading Taiwan - which is what will really start WWIII. If Russia had been allowed to run roughshod with no response from the US or Europe, I feel pretty confident the Chinese would be emboldened to make concrete plans to invade (if they haven’t already).
 
I firmly believe that every dollar spent helping Ukraine bog down the Russians is a dollar that makes the Chinese hesitant about invading Taiwan - which is what will really start WWIII. If Russia had been allowed to run roughshod with no response from the US or Europe, I feel pretty confident the Chinese would be emboldened to make concrete plans to invade (if they haven’t already).
I think The Plan coming out of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics was for Russia to invade Ukraine while Biden was in office as a trial balloon to gauge potential international response to China invading Taiwan. The Olympics ended on February 20, 2022. Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022.

If there was minimal international response to the Ukrainian invasion, I am 100% convinced the Chinese would have tried to invade Taiwan prior to the 2024 US election. The Russians and Chinese basically announced as much at the beginning of the Olympics. Those are old countries and symbolism is especially important to them. I believe the intent was to announce a start of a new global order where the Dragon and the Bear were going to put the Eagle in a cage with the Beijing Olympics being the metaphorical beginning of that new age.

The thought that Russia would side with us over the Chinese is imbecilic. The Russians were OBVIOUSLY working in concert with China to avoid us coming down on either of them.
 
Last edited:
They’re acquiring land all over the United States next to our military basis, inserting spyware into anything that’s imported, flying spy balloons over the country, have spies buddies up with some of the top democrat senators, have been flooding fentanyl over our border working with the cartels.

But we should send hundreds of billions to the most corrupt country in Europe to kill some Russians and show China we aren’t messing around.
 
They’re acquiring land all over the United States next to our military basis, inserting spyware into anything that’s imported, flying spy balloons over the country, have spies buddies up with some of the top democrat senators, have been flooding fentanyl over our border working with the cartels.

But we should send hundreds of billions to the most corrupt country in Europe to kill some Russians and show China we aren’t messing around.
It’s cool - as soon as Xi Jinping tells Donald that he is a strong, handsome man with tremendous hair, we’ll be allies with them, too, and that problem will be solved.
 
I firmly believe that every dollar spent helping Ukraine bog down the Russians is a dollar that makes the Chinese hesitant about invading Taiwan - which is what will really start WWIII. If Russia had been allowed to run roughshod with no response from the US or Europe, I feel pretty confident the Chinese would be emboldened to make concrete plans to invade (if they haven’t already).

Do you think what China has observed makes it more or less hesitant about Taiwan, Korea, or even parts of Japan?

You don’t think China knows we have an actual interest in Taiwan????
 
I think The Plan coming out of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics was for Russia to invade Ukraine while Biden was in office as a trial balloon to gauge potential international response to China invading Taiwan. The Olympics ended on February 20, 2022. Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022.

I can just see Putin sitting around waiting to see who won the gold in cross country skiing before launching his invasion into Ukraine.

Definitely was waiting for the Olympics to end and had nothing to do with Kamala Harris meeting with NATO leaders and refusing to rule out the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO those same dates in February that year.
 
It’s cool - as soon as Xi Jinping tells Donald that he is a strong, handsome man with tremendous hair, we’ll be allies with them, too, and that problem will be solved.

As long as we get chips, that’d be a better result than spending hundreds of billions slaughtering Ukrainians and Russians.

Or we could have just spent that same amount of money incentivizing domestic chip manufacturing so we didn’t care as much about Taiwan.
 
I think The Plan coming out of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics was for Russia to invade Ukraine while Biden was in office as a trial balloon to gauge potential international response to China invading Taiwan. The Olympics ended on February 20, 2022. Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022.

If there was minimal international response to the Ukrainian invasion, I am 100% convinced the Chinese would have tried to invade Taiwan prior to the 2024 US election. The Russians and Chinese basically announced as much at the beginning of the Olympics. Those are old countries and symbolism is especially important to them. I believe the intent was to announce a start of a new global order where the Dragon and the Bear were going to put the Eagle in a cage.

The thought that Russia would side with us over the Chinese is imbecilic. The Russians were OBVIOUSLY working in concert with China to avoid us coming down on either of them.

Huh???

The Biden administration thought Ukraine would fall in a matter of months, if not weeks. It was only after it became obvious that their prediction was grossly flawed that there was a strong cry to help Ukraine. If they thought Ukraine would fall quickly, why do you propose this as some sort of a trial balloon for China and our response was paramount to Taiwan’s safety?
 
Or we could have just spent that same amount of money incentivizing domestic chip manufacturing so we didn’t care as much about Taiwan.
This would be great. But we didn’t. I have also hoped for years that we would treat clean/alternative energy like the early years of the space program so we could tell the Middle East to get ****ed, but we won’t do that either. Oh, well.
 
Do you think what China has observed makes it more or less hesitant about Taiwan, Korea, or even parts of Japan?

You don’t think China knows we have an actual interest in Taiwan????
I think it has made them realize that Russia isn’t quite as strong as they might have thought. Starting WWIII backed by a resurgent Russia running roughshod over Eastern Europe (there is zero chance they would have stopped with Ukraine) is one thing. Starting it backed by a Russia that has struggled with an overmatched opponent and been forced to use North Koreans as cannon fodder is another.
 
Or we could have just spent that same amount of money incentivizing domestic chip manufacturing so we didn’t care as much about Taiwan.
Oh that would be great: government deciding what industries to invest in & spending our money on them. Where have I ever heard that idea before? I mean Trump was supposedly about government spending less money. Now guess it's about spending on what MAGA likes vs. what Libs like. There's no hope.
 
I firmly believe that every dollar spent helping Ukraine bog down the Russians is a dollar that makes the Chinese hesitant about invading Taiwan - which is what will really start WWIII. If Russia had been allowed to run roughshod with no response from the US or Europe, I feel pretty confident the Chinese would be emboldened to make concrete plans to invade (if they haven’t already).
To the contrary, pulling out and refocusing against China with the money - not to mention potential Russian acquiescence - would be the right read on this.
 
To the contrary, pulling out and refocusing against China with the money - not to mention potential Russian acquiescence - would be the right read on this.
Hard disagree but whatever. I don’t think it’s an “either/or” proposition. I also don’t think you can take the Russians’ word on anything. When Vlad Putin dies a well-deserved death, maybe I’ll reconsider. I don’t toss the word “evil” around lightly, but he qualifies.
 
Oh that would be great: government deciding what industries to invest in & spending our money on them. Where have I ever heard that idea before? I mean Trump was supposedly about government spending less money. Now guess it's about spending on what MAGA likes vs. what Libs like. There's no hope.


Jesus christ. I said it would have been a better alternative to just spending hundreds of billions of dollars to kill hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians and Russians.
 
They’re acquiring land all over the United States next to our military basis, inserting spyware into anything that’s imported, flying spy balloons over the country, have spies buddies up with some of the top democrat senators, have been flooding fentanyl over our border working with the cartels.

But we should send hundreds of billions to the most corrupt country in Europe to kill some Russians and show China we aren’t messing around.


Cats Pause: "Hey guys, China is our biggest enemy and they're gonna invade Taiwan and it's going to start WWIII"

Me: "Okay, let's put tariffs on them and look for new sources of supply - especially domestically"

Cats Pause: "Whoa!!!! That will cause inflation".

You all can't be f'ing serious right now. And btw, would you clowns risk your life or your kids' lives defending Taiwan? I know I wouldn't.
 
Hard disagree but whatever. I don’t think it’s an “either/or” proposition. I also don’t think you can take the Russians’ word on anything. When Vlad Putin dies a well-deserved death, maybe I’ll reconsider. I don’t toss the word “evil” around lightly, but he qualifies.
What has Putin done wrong to a single American save Brittany Griner and that WSJ dude?
 
No offense intended, but an opinion piece that includes the caveat that there could be several libertarians that would disagree with the opinion is hardly a monolith.

All he's saying is that we shouldn't be funding a war we aren't directly involved in for US security. I'd assume a lot of libertarians would agree but hardly anyone would assume all.
Of course it's not a monolith...theres a spectrum of libertarian just the same as there's blue dog democrats vs progressives.

Tho, an overriding principle of libertarianism is how your tax dollars are spent. None really suggests the state should spend your treasure on ANOTHER state in which isn't harming our border.

Here's probably the most prominent libertarian that's been in US government in modern history

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WayneDougan
Hard disagree but whatever. I don’t think it’s an “either/or” proposition. I also don’t think you can take the Russians’ word on anything. When Vlad Putin dies a well-deserved death, maybe I’ll reconsider. I don’t toss the word “evil” around lightly, but he qualifies.
Regime change hadnt shown beneficial in a lot of history, often it creates a vacuum. There's no guarantee the next guy in line is going to be better than Vlad It will likely be one of his guys and with less restraint. Putin isn't just a person, he's an entire political apparatus, the next person will likely have even grander Russian imperial aspirations. Who knows tho
 
Every neo-con telling you that we need to prepare to fight China while simultaneously telling you we need to run hundred billion dollar deficits with them should not be taken seriously.
 
Regime change hadnt shown beneficial in a lot of history, often it creates a vacuum. There's no guarantee the next guy in line is going to be better than Vlad It will likely be one of his guys and with less restraint. Putin isn't just a person, he's an entire political apparatus, the next person will likely have even grander Russian imperial aspirations. Who knows tho

  • Putin has been in power for 25 years and has taken over disputed parts of Ukraine that were very pro-Russian.
  • Hitler was in power for 5 years before he took over Austria. Then he quickly went to Czechoslovakia, Poland, Norwary, etc. in a span of like 2 years.
Can you all tell the difference between these two?
 
Cats Pause: "Hey guys, China is our biggest enemy and they're gonna invade Taiwan and it's going to start WWIII"

Me: "Okay, let's put tariffs on them and look for new sources of supply - especially domestically"

Cats Pause: "Whoa!!!! That will cause inflation".

You all can't be f'ing serious right now. And btw, would you clowns risk your life or your kids' lives defending Taiwan? I know I wouldn't.


wtf are you taking about?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hank Camacho
If Trump announces that he wants out of NATO, would you support that?

I ask becuase I feel like it's the setup we are getting. Make unreasonable demands, complicate relationships with allies, blame NATO and then leave.

Im fine with staying in nato if everyone pays their share. Otherwise why do we need to carry all the weight?

The fun thing, as many on here are incapable of nuance and everything has to be black or white, meaning ppl dont understand more than one thing can be true... also meaning if they do have elections , monitored ones, there will be a refusal to accept the outcome if its not Zekensky, just bc the tired record will play once again. "Everything i don't like is bc of putin"

I know i know, all the chirping parrots can do is coo 'ohhwawa putin puppet putin puppet"

Has nothing to do with supposedly "supporting Russia"

We've already seen it happen

But we don't have anything to do with elections tho.


No doubt those judges part of the usaid judicial outreach program.

I’d imagine Russia thinks the Ukrainian people will elect someone who is not a USAID puppet that allows their country to be a pawn in a proxy war fought for the sole purpose of funneling US taxpayer money to politicians.

Are we funneling US tax dollars through Russia pretending we’re “protecting democracy”? If so, we should probably tell them to have elections or the whole “democracy” thing is an obvious lie to convince gullible people there’s a righteous cause, not just politicians stealing taxpayer money.

That's exactly why z wont have elections. Especially now since usaid cant fix them .
 
One month in, Vance is crushing his role as VP:


It still boggles my mind there were people who believed all the propaganda about Ukraine winning. Now we know it was all propaganda and they still believe it. Its something.

So, entering negotiations regarding a Sovereign Nation without its participation is common or preferred?

Pray do tell Caveman, if the comparison to Chamberlain is “ridicules,” cite three other examples of negotiations over a sovereign nation without its participation . . . .

Or just two examples. . . .

Or even just one other example.

I can think of only two: and one is ongoing, and the other involved Chamberlain.

They are sovereign only in appearance. We literally fund their government, bought their media and judicial system, and installed our puppet who now wont have an election.

That's hardly sovereign.
 
I think it has made them realize that Russia isn’t quite as strong as they might have thought. Starting WWIII backed by a resurgent Russia running roughshod over Eastern Europe (there is zero chance they would have stopped with Ukraine) is one thing. Starting it backed by a Russia that has struggled with an overmatched opponent and been forced to use North Koreans as cannon fodder is another.

So, you think China believed (1) their attempt to claim Taiwan by physical force would start WWIII, (2) that Russia was strong enough to handle Eastern Europe for them in such a war, and (3) Ukraine was an audition for Russia?

I have not heard such a theory. Rather, I thought the belief was that China was watching to see how the world would respond to Russia to see if military force against Taiwan would unite others in defense of Taiwan that may trigger a WWIII.

This is news to me. One belief has China poised to start a world war while the other has China wary of so engaging.
 
I suggest those that think some here want war name names or STFU vs. making veiled claims.

First, you don’t evidently realize that your comments put you in that very category. Second, RIGHT AFTER your post, a poster said he was okay with a continued one to two decade war. So, you may want to STFU. 😆
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT