We want to become friends and draw that down significantly.
We want to become friends and draw that down significantly.
You think it is a good idea to try to ally with Vlade Putin.Good god you're a ****ing loser.
You think it is a good idea to try to ally with Vlade Putin.
Let that sink in. What other great ideas you got? Loaning money to Antoine Walker? Hiring Katina Powell as a babysitter?
I think The Plan coming out of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics was for Russia to invade Ukraine while Biden was in office as a trial balloon to gauge potential international response to China invading Taiwan. The Olympics ended on February 20, 2022. Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022.I firmly believe that every dollar spent helping Ukraine bog down the Russians is a dollar that makes the Chinese hesitant about invading Taiwan - which is what will really start WWIII. If Russia had been allowed to run roughshod with no response from the US or Europe, I feel pretty confident the Chinese would be emboldened to make concrete plans to invade (if they haven’t already).
It’s cool - as soon as Xi Jinping tells Donald that he is a strong, handsome man with tremendous hair, we’ll be allies with them, too, and that problem will be solved.They’re acquiring land all over the United States next to our military basis, inserting spyware into anything that’s imported, flying spy balloons over the country, have spies buddies up with some of the top democrat senators, have been flooding fentanyl over our border working with the cartels.
But we should send hundreds of billions to the most corrupt country in Europe to kill some Russians and show China we aren’t messing around.
I firmly believe that every dollar spent helping Ukraine bog down the Russians is a dollar that makes the Chinese hesitant about invading Taiwan - which is what will really start WWIII. If Russia had been allowed to run roughshod with no response from the US or Europe, I feel pretty confident the Chinese would be emboldened to make concrete plans to invade (if they haven’t already).
I think The Plan coming out of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics was for Russia to invade Ukraine while Biden was in office as a trial balloon to gauge potential international response to China invading Taiwan. The Olympics ended on February 20, 2022. Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022.
It’s cool - as soon as Xi Jinping tells Donald that he is a strong, handsome man with tremendous hair, we’ll be allies with them, too, and that problem will be solved.
I think The Plan coming out of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics was for Russia to invade Ukraine while Biden was in office as a trial balloon to gauge potential international response to China invading Taiwan. The Olympics ended on February 20, 2022. Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022.
If there was minimal international response to the Ukrainian invasion, I am 100% convinced the Chinese would have tried to invade Taiwan prior to the 2024 US election. The Russians and Chinese basically announced as much at the beginning of the Olympics. Those are old countries and symbolism is especially important to them. I believe the intent was to announce a start of a new global order where the Dragon and the Bear were going to put the Eagle in a cage.
The thought that Russia would side with us over the Chinese is imbecilic. The Russians were OBVIOUSLY working in concert with China to avoid us coming down on either of them.
This would be great. But we didn’t. I have also hoped for years that we would treat clean/alternative energy like the early years of the space program so we could tell the Middle East to get ****ed, but we won’t do that either. Oh, well.Or we could have just spent that same amount of money incentivizing domestic chip manufacturing so we didn’t care as much about Taiwan.
I think it has made them realize that Russia isn’t quite as strong as they might have thought. Starting WWIII backed by a resurgent Russia running roughshod over Eastern Europe (there is zero chance they would have stopped with Ukraine) is one thing. Starting it backed by a Russia that has struggled with an overmatched opponent and been forced to use North Koreans as cannon fodder is another.Do you think what China has observed makes it more or less hesitant about Taiwan, Korea, or even parts of Japan?
You don’t think China knows we have an actual interest in Taiwan????
Oh that would be great: government deciding what industries to invest in & spending our money on them. Where have I ever heard that idea before? I mean Trump was supposedly about government spending less money. Now guess it's about spending on what MAGA likes vs. what Libs like. There's no hope.Or we could have just spent that same amount of money incentivizing domestic chip manufacturing so we didn’t care as much about Taiwan.
I suggest those that think some here want war name names or STFU vs. making veiled claims.And you suggested no one here wants the war to proceed. 😆
Might want to go back now and read the rest of what Vance posted.
To the contrary, pulling out and refocusing against China with the money - not to mention potential Russian acquiescence - would be the right read on this.I firmly believe that every dollar spent helping Ukraine bog down the Russians is a dollar that makes the Chinese hesitant about invading Taiwan - which is what will really start WWIII. If Russia had been allowed to run roughshod with no response from the US or Europe, I feel pretty confident the Chinese would be emboldened to make concrete plans to invade (if they haven’t already).
Hard disagree but whatever. I don’t think it’s an “either/or” proposition. I also don’t think you can take the Russians’ word on anything. When Vlad Putin dies a well-deserved death, maybe I’ll reconsider. I don’t toss the word “evil” around lightly, but he qualifies.To the contrary, pulling out and refocusing against China with the money - not to mention potential Russian acquiescence - would be the right read on this.
Oh that would be great: government deciding what industries to invest in & spending our money on them. Where have I ever heard that idea before? I mean Trump was supposedly about government spending less money. Now guess it's about spending on what MAGA likes vs. what Libs like. There's no hope.
They’re acquiring land all over the United States next to our military basis, inserting spyware into anything that’s imported, flying spy balloons over the country, have spies buddies up with some of the top democrat senators, have been flooding fentanyl over our border working with the cartels.
But we should send hundreds of billions to the most corrupt country in Europe to kill some Russians and show China we aren’t messing around.
What has Putin done wrong to a single American save Brittany Griner and that WSJ dude?Hard disagree but whatever. I don’t think it’s an “either/or” proposition. I also don’t think you can take the Russians’ word on anything. When Vlad Putin dies a well-deserved death, maybe I’ll reconsider. I don’t toss the word “evil” around lightly, but he qualifies.
Of course it's not a monolith...theres a spectrum of libertarian just the same as there's blue dog democrats vs progressives.No offense intended, but an opinion piece that includes the caveat that there could be several libertarians that would disagree with the opinion is hardly a monolith.
All he's saying is that we shouldn't be funding a war we aren't directly involved in for US security. I'd assume a lot of libertarians would agree but hardly anyone would assume all.
Regime change hadnt shown beneficial in a lot of history, often it creates a vacuum. There's no guarantee the next guy in line is going to be better than Vlad It will likely be one of his guys and with less restraint. Putin isn't just a person, he's an entire political apparatus, the next person will likely have even grander Russian imperial aspirations. Who knows thoHard disagree but whatever. I don’t think it’s an “either/or” proposition. I also don’t think you can take the Russians’ word on anything. When Vlad Putin dies a well-deserved death, maybe I’ll reconsider. I don’t toss the word “evil” around lightly, but he qualifies.
Regime change hadnt shown beneficial in a lot of history, often it creates a vacuum. There's no guarantee the next guy in line is going to be better than Vlad It will likely be one of his guys and with less restraint. Putin isn't just a person, he's an entire political apparatus, the next person will likely have even grander Russian imperial aspirations. Who knows tho
Cats Pause: "Hey guys, China is our biggest enemy and they're gonna invade Taiwan and it's going to start WWIII"
Me: "Okay, let's put tariffs on them and look for new sources of supply - especially domestically"
Cats Pause: "Whoa!!!! That will cause inflation".
You all can't be f'ing serious right now. And btw, would you clowns risk your life or your kids' lives defending Taiwan? I know I wouldn't.
There are people on this thread who are saying that the Ukraine thing is a test run for China taking Taiwan. These same clowns also advocate for us to push our manufacturing base to China.wtf are you taking about?
If Trump announces that he wants out of NATO, would you support that?
I ask becuase I feel like it's the setup we are getting. Make unreasonable demands, complicate relationships with allies, blame NATO and then leave.
The fun thing, as many on here are incapable of nuance and everything has to be black or white, meaning ppl dont understand more than one thing can be true... also meaning if they do have elections , monitored ones, there will be a refusal to accept the outcome if its not Zekensky, just bc the tired record will play once again. "Everything i don't like is bc of putin"
I know i know, all the chirping parrots can do is coo 'ohhwawa putin puppet putin puppet"
Has nothing to do with supposedly "supporting Russia"
We've already seen it happen
But we don't have anything to do with elections tho.
I’d imagine Russia thinks the Ukrainian people will elect someone who is not a USAID puppet that allows their country to be a pawn in a proxy war fought for the sole purpose of funneling US taxpayer money to politicians.
Are we funneling US tax dollars through Russia pretending we’re “protecting democracy”? If so, we should probably tell them to have elections or the whole “democracy” thing is an obvious lie to convince gullible people there’s a righteous cause, not just politicians stealing taxpayer money.
So, entering negotiations regarding a Sovereign Nation without its participation is common or preferred?
Pray do tell Caveman, if the comparison to Chamberlain is “ridicules,” cite three other examples of negotiations over a sovereign nation without its participation . . . .
Or just two examples. . . .
Or even just one other example.
I can think of only two: and one is ongoing, and the other involved Chamberlain.
I think it has made them realize that Russia isn’t quite as strong as they might have thought. Starting WWIII backed by a resurgent Russia running roughshod over Eastern Europe (there is zero chance they would have stopped with Ukraine) is one thing. Starting it backed by a Russia that has struggled with an overmatched opponent and been forced to use North Koreans as cannon fodder is another.
I suggest those that think some here want war name names or STFU vs. making veiled claims.