He says they're aren't US soldiers there, you do. Taking your position, since US soldiers are in Ukraine, you think there's a chance Putin would nuke them?We all know that there are American soldiers in Ukraine. That is not debatable. They just are not formally part of the U.S. military. So, please …
And, the country that dealt with Chernobyl won’t use tactical nukes because it prohibits invasion? Look, I am not arguing that Putin will actually use nukes, but the reason he states is just dumb. Ukraine would effectively be disabled if Russia uses a precisely placed nuke. At that point, every front in the war becomes disabled for Ukraine. There are many reasons Russia would not use a nuke. That is not one of them.
In fact, by suggesting this is a proxy war, why would Russia need to invade after it used a nuke if its desire is to quench Westernization?
I read in the article that nuke(s) would make Ukraine unattractive to Russia or anyone to occupy for a good long while. No? I think nukes emit more radiation than Chernobyl did. Could be wrong.
I just think it's a bad signal to the bad actors to pull up stakes there.