I was told in the Taylor Swift thread that Kendrick Lamar was an artist. I have heard of him so I'm watching it right now.
I've played music for >45 years so I'm not an uneducated hack. I see not much artistry in what I'm watching. Mainly a drum machine with a few synth chords thrown in every so often. No melody from the vocalist, just rapid fire rhythmic rhymes. I don't expect pop music to rival Bach and Mozart. But this type of 'artistry' really seems like least common denominator type stuff.
Serious question: how do any of these types of artists distinguish themselves? There is not singular musicianship, choreography, melodic content, etc.
I won't say it sucks. There's just nothing to it. I would put it alongside modern art where the artist just randomly throws paint on a canvas and declares it 'art'.
In 25 years, will Kendrick Lamar music be remembered or still be influential? I would highly doubt it.
I've played music for >45 years so I'm not an uneducated hack. I see not much artistry in what I'm watching. Mainly a drum machine with a few synth chords thrown in every so often. No melody from the vocalist, just rapid fire rhythmic rhymes. I don't expect pop music to rival Bach and Mozart. But this type of 'artistry' really seems like least common denominator type stuff.
Serious question: how do any of these types of artists distinguish themselves? There is not singular musicianship, choreography, melodic content, etc.
I won't say it sucks. There's just nothing to it. I would put it alongside modern art where the artist just randomly throws paint on a canvas and declares it 'art'.
In 25 years, will Kendrick Lamar music be remembered or still be influential? I would highly doubt it.