Yea not going to happen!Pay ESPN $6.99 a month an you too can find out why Stoops is ranked 4th as an overachiever 😂
Heh. Comes with my Hulu, Disney+, and ESPN+. Best money I spend for my family. Everything from Bluey to paywalled ESPN articles to Star Wars shows to Hulu movies. /chefs kissPay ESPN $6.99 a month an you too can find out why Stoops is ranked 4th as an overachiever 😂
You're missing out on good coverage and analysis, but if you don't care about national level perspectives and are mostly concerned with parochial issues then I get it.I wouldn't give those clowns one red cent. to be an “insider”.
I would have Stoops and Campbell in a two way tie at the top. Fitz has done some nice things an NW but not quite at the level of the other two. Leach is a good coach and has had some success everywhere he has stopped but seriously he hasn't built anything like the others.The ranking of the overachievers which I more I less think I agree with but I would swap Clawson and Leach, and bump Stoops up to #3.
Leipold's inclusion seems premature to me, but the author makes a compelling case about his success in D3 at Wisconsin-Whitewater and also at Buffalo.
1. Mike Leach
2. Pat Fitzgerald (Northwestern)
3. Matt Campbell (Iowa St)
4. Stoops
5. Dave Clawson (Wake)
6. Jeff Tedford (Fresno St)
7. Jeff Monken (Army)
8. Hugh Freeze (Liberty)
9. PJ Fleck (Minnesota)
10. Lance Leipold (Kansas)
How many coaches gave in the last ten years? 4, 5? How many are still at their schools? 2 maybe?Liking where everything is headed but let’s be honest. The guy still hasn’t won a division title. He’s got a long way to go
1. Mike Leach
2. Pat Fitzgerald (Northwestern)
3. Matt Campbell (Iowa St)
4. Stoops
5. Dave Clawson (Wake)
6. Jeff Tedford (Fresno St)
7. Jeff Monken (Army)
8. Hugh Freeze (Liberty)
9. PJ Fleck (Minnesota)
10. Lance Leipold (Kansas)
I think the strongest argument for Fitz is he’s taken them to B10 championship game with 50th-ish recruiting rankings albeit in a weak division.I would have Stoops and Campbell in a two way tie at the top. Fitz has done some nice things an NW but not quite at the level of the other two. Leach is a good coach and has had some success everywhere he has stopped but seriously he hasn't built anything like the others.
I think Freeze could eventually be #1 but he just hasn't been there long enough to prove they aren't just a 2 year fluke yet.
I think the strongest argument for Fitz is he’s taken them to B10 championship game with 50th-ish recruiting rankings albeit in a weak division.
This right here.Heh. Comes with my Hulu, Disney+, and ESPN+. Best money I spend for my family. Everything from Bluey to paywalled ESPN articles to Star Wars shows to Hulu movies. /chefs kiss
Agreed. Gof5 to the playoff is almost as overachiever as it gets, besides winning a playoff game and then the title.I'm kind of suprised Luke Fickell isn't on this list. What he has accomplished at Cincinatti has been pretty impressive. I guess you could make the argument that last year might have been a fluke but I guess we will see this year.
Liking where everything is headed but let’s be honest. The guy still hasn’t won a division title. He’s got a long way to go
The ranking of the overachievers which I more I less think I agree with but I would swap Clawson and Leach, and bump Stoops up to #3.
Leipold's inclusion seems premature to me, but the author makes a compelling case about his success in D3 at Wisconsin-Whitewater and also at Buffalo.
1. Mike Leach
2. Pat Fitzgerald (Northwestern)
3. Matt Campbell (Iowa St)
4. Stoops
5. Dave Clawson (Wake)
6. Jeff Tedford (Fresno St)
7. Jeff Monken (Army)
8. Hugh Freeze (Liberty)
9. PJ Fleck (Minnesota)
10. Lance Leipold (Kansas)
I'm kind of suprised Luke Fickell isn't on this list. What he has accomplished at Cincinnati has been pretty impressive. I guess you could make the argument that last year might have been a fluke but I guess we will see this year.
Kentucky beat Clemson in 2006 Music City Bowl with Rich Brooks at the helm. Kentucky lost to them in the 2009 Music City Bowl, so they were on a par with the Kentucky in those years.Sorry to be a homer, but it is difficult to imagine three coaches that have overachieved more than Stoops since his arrival at UK.
I'd give 'em Dabo, just because I don't recall Clemson being a football powerhouse, at least not in the immediate years before he arrived.
He was on an even better list, the national championship contender list, and one that began with Saban at No. 1. Fickle was No. 10 on it. Notwithstanding the perfect storm in 2021 that allowed a midmajor to be a 1st round playoff sacrifice, I don't really consider the University of Cincinnati to be a legitimate college power.Hard to believe he shouldn't be there, Cincy has been dang good 2 years in a row. Maybe stars aligned for them, but they had several kids drafted in 22.
agree. stoops would be on a different one of these tiersHe's been there since '06, and is basically a lifer until he wants to go.
If Stoops stays at status quo for another 7 years, bouncing between 10 wins, 7 wins, and 5 wins, he won't be an overachiever at that point either.
My favorite non-UK football memory is a Clemson one:Kentucky beat Clemson in 2006 Music City Bowl with Rich Brooks at the helm. Kentucky lost to them in the 2009 Music City Bowl, so they were on a par with the Kentucky in those years.
TrueI hear what you are saying, but to be fair, I think Stoops & Co would've likely won a division in the ACC last year (and probably 2018 when Pitt played Clemson for the ACC title with a 7-5 regular season record). For example, the Penn St team that the 2018 Cats beat in the bowl game beat that Pitt team 51-6.
In 2021, Stoops and crew beat the Big Ten West Champs in the Bowl Game, so while not a guarantee, I think they could've won that western division of the Big Ten last season.
If winning a division title is the only benchmark for overachieving, the list becomes almost non-existent.