How much will we drop from beating a quad 1 opp on the road. I say the kentucky 3 to 4 drop 🤣🤣🤣. I'm just kidding but technically if we did drop or even stayed flat I wouldn't be surprised lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The alabama tn rankings had me confused for awhile. There records were virtually identical except tn winning i believe 2 of the quad one games that bama had lost. Yet bama was ranked teo spots higher. I could only gather that its due to last years performance still being playing a factor
But those loses would lower Cals winning %.They are higher because they understand how to hack the system.
They are 9-5. They are 0-5 in QUAD 1. Of their remaining 9-0 record, 3 of 9 are QUAD 2 wins.
Alabama is up there simply because they have played a much higher percentage of Q1/Q2 compared to any other team and have only lost to great teams.
Kentucky could take a page from that.
Kentucky's NET is lower because, for some reason, have played SIX QUAD 4 teams. For no reason.
This. When UK lost, people said "UNCW will win their conference and be a likely tourney team, just watch" .... they just lost back to back games to Drexel and Towson.Plus, UNCW is not a good team. They have fallen a ton since beating UK. Now 135 in the NET and likely going to remain a QUAD 3 loss all year.
Yes, but ......all time wins....Kansas......Kentucky could take a page from that.
This. When UK lost, people said "UNCW will win their conference and be a likely tourney team, just watch" .... they just lost back to back games to Drexel and Towson.
Don’t we have three Quad 1 wins? Miami and UNC were both top 10.Kentucky moved from 23 to 17 in the NET as they picked up their second QUAD 1 win of the season.
Tennessee is 5th in the NET
Alabama is 6th in the NET
Auburn is 8th in the NET
Miami has fallen out of Q1 territoryDon’t we have three Quad 1 wins? Miami and UNC were both top 10.
TAMU has lost 3 of their last five games and has to go to Auburn next for another probably loss. Certainly hasn't played like a team returning most of its production.Texas A&M losing at home to LSU, dropped them from 25 to 40. Should still be a good opportunity but geez, talking about a terrible loss.
I have UNCW rated like 287. That was an incredibly poor coaching performance more than anything else, imo.This. When UK lost, people said "UNCW will win their conference and be a likely tourney team, just watch" .... they just lost back to back games to Drexel and Towson.
A&M has been one of the most inconsistent teams in the country for the past several years. They’re usually good for a hot streak at some point that starts them talking about how much they’re getting disrespected in the rankings/tournament seeding, but take some truly bad losses in other parts of the season. Hopefully we catch them next weekend while they’re still in a slump.TAMU has lost 3 of their last five games and has to go to Auburn next for another probably loss. Certainly hasn't played like a team returning most of its production.
Correct. It's like the old approach in college football. Margin of victory mattered so much during the BCS era. You can't just beat bad teams, you have to go out and stomp them.One thing people on this board don't take in to account enough is margin of victory.
Auburn jumped from 15th to 8th.
Not because they got a quad 2 win over #92 Arkansas.
But they mollywhopped them by 32.
I may be wrong, but I thought NET used margin of victory capped at 10 points. So a 10 pt. win is no different than a 50 pt. win.Correct. It's like the old approach in college football. Margin of victory mattered so much during the BCS era. You can't just beat bad teams, you have to go out and stomp them.
Yeah pretty sure it caps it at 10.I may be wrong, but I thought NET used margin of victory capped at 10 points. So a 10 pt. win is no different than a 50 pt. win.
But doesn’t it go by what they were the day the game was played.Miami has fallen out of Q1 territory
The margin of victory caps at 10 but destroying bad teams increases your offensive efficiency which is still factored in Look at the placing of Iowa state and BYU in the net rankingsI may be wrong, but I thought NET used margin of victory capped at 10 points. So a 10 pt. win is no different than a 50 pt. win.
This is more accurate.The margin of victory caps at 10 but destroying bad teams increases your offensive efficiency which is still factored in Look at the placing of Iowa state and BYU in the net rankings
Unfortunately not. It's always fluctuating. That's why we cheer for certain OOC teams that we've beaten or lost to all season.But doesn’t it go by what they were the day the game was played.