Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Had the same thought. There is a difference between moving up the same road a little farther then falling way back down the same road like did for so many years, than actually turning a corner onto a new path. I think we actually took the exit onto a new road when our recruiting started picking up after Stoops arrived. So now we're on the exit ramp getting ready to merge onto the highway and are in the process of picking up speed to do so.You gotta start somewhere. But I have long believed that when you have minimal football tradition or history that elusive "corner" is really a big, wide sweeping turn in the road that takes years to "turn". JMO.
Peace
Had the same thought. There is a difference between moving up the same road a little farther then falling way back down the same road like did for so many years, than actually turning a corner onto a new path. I think we actually took the exit onto a new road when our recruiting started picking up after Stoops arrived. So now we're on the exit ramp getting ready to merge onto the highway and are in the process of picking up speed to do so.
Not sure if any single game will do that but it will take continued recruiting success and at least some "Big Wins" to get up fast enough to merge in with the big boys without crashing. What a ground breaking win over Florida does is keeps changing the perception of UK football which continues bring up the talent level that keeps the accelerator mashed a little harder.
The good news is our floor has been raised considerably IMO so that if we miss a gear here or there we won't have to fall back to first anymore to keep going, but maybe drop back to third and pick back up from there.
That's why what Wild said it was a slow curve and not a sharp corner that suddenly changes everything. The improvement in recruiting is the same way. Better recruiting leads to a few more wins which leads to slightly better recruiting and so on. You don't suddenly start getting 5 stars because you went to a bowl game. But when you start stacking classed together that are clearly a step (or two) above where you have been before then the wins start slowly growing and then the recruiting does too. You just can't have the disaster year and fall back like we have in the past but that's not likely with the level of better talent we have brought in and that is the good thing.Everything you said is true. The problem in football is even with our better recruiting, we are light years away from them. Our best recruits are a dime a dozen to the big boys 3 deep! Stoops recruiting right now as it stands has us not middle of the pack but a little outside the middle. To "compete" with the big boys we need 5-8 5*'s, and at least 10 4*'s a class. AT LEAST. Until we do we are not gaining ground on who it matters to gain ground on.
This is not like basketball where a scrub 16-14 team full of 3*'s can upset all 5* lineup. Football it's waaaaaay less likely because they are knee deep three deep in 4/5* players.
That's why what Wild said it was a slow curve and not a sharp corner that suddenly changes everything. The improvement in recruiting is the same way. Better recruiting leads to a few more wins which leads to slightly better recruiting and so on. You don't suddenly start getting 5 stars because you went to a bowl game. But when you start stacking classed together that are clearly a step (or two) above where you have been before then the wins start slowly growing and then the recruiting does too. You just can't have the disaster year and fall back like we have in the past but that's not likely with the level of better talent we have brought in and that is the good thing.
UK will be competitive and a player in the east. I realize you feel the Dawgs are primed to claw everyone in their way. I also realize SC will have a stout defense. Florida should succumb to the Dawgs. UT is a question. Vandy is Vandy. As for the Wildcats, we will come to play.I believe UK will be better next year, but they aren't the only team in the East who is going to be better, we will be quite a bit better, USC will be a good bit better, that frosh qb they pulled the rs off is a difference maker, alot like Connor Shaw was, better passer but not quite the runner, Missouri will be better. I see UT dropping off a good bit, UF some, don't really know about Vandy, Webb is back so they could have a pretty good running game and will be good defensively. MSST will be better, and while dropping Bama is a plus, adding OM isn't exactly an easy game, while they are likely to be under some serious sanctions and their frosh class wasn't very good, they still have 3 classes that were the best they could buy. So without mass transfers after the sanctions and bowl bans, they won't be a cakewalk, if Freeze can get the team back. He lost them last year, maybe because of the investigation, maybe losing Kelly, maybe assistants looking to get out as soon as possible or a combinations. But the frosh QB is very good, very mobile and very good passer. If Freeze regains control and they don't have massive transfers, they could be one of the West's top 3 teams.
OK, thanks for your analysis.Hell USM is not a given, they put there foot on our neck in our own house. What makes you think it will be different there? With basketball, we are the greatest program in the nation, with football, we got a TON of work to do.
I stand firm on 4 wins. 3 cupcakes and mizzou. We have only won I THINK 2 AWAY SEC games since who knows how long. We barely beat vandy, uscar at home. We're not touching Ole miss, UF, UT, miss st, Georgia or UL. 4-8. YES I'm a fan, no I'm not a Tard fan, no I won't go root for somebody else.
UK will be competitive and a player in the east. I realize you feel the Dawgs are primed to claw everyone in their way. I also realize SC will have a stout defense. Florida should succumb to the Dawgs. UT is a question. Vandy is Vandy. As for the Wildcats, we will come to play.
Everything you said is true. The problem in football is even with our better recruiting, we are light years away from them. Our best recruits are a dime a dozen to the big boys 3 deep! Stoops recruiting right now as it stands has us not middle of the pack but a little outside the middle. To "compete" with the big boys we need 5-8 5*'s, and at least 10 4*'s a class. AT LEAST. Until we do we are not gaining ground on who it matters to gain ground on.
This is not like basketball where a scrub 16-14 team full of 3*'s can upset all 5* lineup. Football it's waaaaaay less likely because they are knee deep three deep in 4/5* players.
8+ wins is acceptable. Anything less will be a failure.
Why we should improve so shall other teams.
There were quite a few games that could have went either way.
Not all teams will improve, some will regress or stay essentially the same, while others may improve but necessarily to the degree that we will. On paper anyway Kentucky should be one of the most improved teams in the league. I think that's the feeling a lot of our fans are expressing.
True and that includes some of our losses as well as wins.
Sept 2: @ Miss St- Win
Sept 9: EKU - Win Overall 8-4
Sept 16: @ USC- Hard fought win
Sept 23: UF- lose
Sept 30: E. Mich- Win
Oct 7: Mizzu-Win
Oct 21 Miss ST- Win
Oct 28: Tenn- Lose
Nov 4: Ol Miss- Win
Nov 11: @Vandy- Win
Nov 18: @Georgia-Lose
Nov 25: Louisville- Lose
jbapp1978, I won't pound on you too hard, but the Southern Miss loss was to a team who had one of the most productive QB's in college football. He's gone, now.
At the time of our first game in '16, we had yet to find an unknown fellow on our own bench who finished in the top 5 nationally for TD passes of 40 yards or longer, and a true frosh who EASILY topped the true frosh rushing numbers of luminaries such as Mark Higgs, Mark Logan, Chris Jones, Boom Williams, etc., etc., and who did so missing the first 2 games.
A loss to Southern Miss is not out of the question, but you state we won't touch Ole Miss at home?? They will be a shadow of '16, which was a shadow of their program in '14.
And you state that we need "5-8 five stars and 10 four stars" to get it done? I think those numbers might actually slightly exceed Bama's average class the last 5 years. I'd love to see it, but if we had pulled those recruiting numbers any of the last 4 seasons, Ole Miss might be looking clean compared to us.
Enjoy the process, and the easy exceeding of your modest expectations in '17.
Not sure how that emoji got there but I'm happy that it's that one instead of a rainbow or unicorn. Honestly was on a PC and must have got keyed something.