Yep...and quite frankly, all these female athletes complaining about fair or equal pay should really be directing their outrage at all the so called feminists who trumpet equal pay in everybody's face, but never, ever watch women's sports or support women's sports in any capacity.Ridiculous.
Absolutely ridiculous.
This is capitalism. Not everyone gets the same pay or opportunities, the market determines that. Bo Nix should get more in NIL than the backup setter for the volleyball team. Why is this so hard to understand?
32 selfish athletes wanting to ruin it for everyone- just like Ed O'Bannon with the EA Sports lawsuit.
We are teaching children to be little narcissistic socialists and this is the result. Equity over equality. Sad thing is your average college student would not be able to tell you the difference.Ridiculous.
Absolutely ridiculous.
This is capitalism. Not everyone gets the same pay or opportunities, the market determines that. Bo Nix should get more in NIL than the backup setter for the volleyball team. Why is this so hard to understand?
32 selfish athletes wanting to ruin it for everyone- just like Ed O'Bannon with the EA Sports lawsuit.
Universities have nothing to do with NIL. Or atleast that's the way it's suppsoed to be. Nobody is naive enough to actually believe that though lol.Don't be surprised if, in the Ninth Federal Appellate District in San Francisco, to which cases in Oregon make their way, and which is by far the most liberal and goofy in the country, there isn't a ruling that says no university can spend one dollar more on NIL for men than it spends on women.
I think it goes without saying how ruinous that could be for a university like Kentucky trying to fend off all competitors to stay at t he top of the college hoops heap. And, of course, it won't matter that men's basketball is a huge revenue sport and that virtually everyone in the state cares about it while women's sports are big money losers, and almost no one cares.
What's going to be interesting is in theory NIL collectives are private "charities". Can the government dictate how a private entity operates? Now, what's going to be even more interesting is discovery. Because to prove that NILs are coerced by schools they'll have to dig into every bit of communication between collectives and university officials (coaches, admins, etc.)Don't be surprised if, in the Ninth Federal Appellate District in San Francisco, to which cases in Oregon make their way, and which is by far the most liberal and goofy in the country, there isn't a ruling that says no university can spend one dollar more on NIL for men than it spends on women.
I think it goes without saying how ruinous that could be for a university like Kentucky trying to fend off all competitors to stay at t he top of the college hoops heap. And, of course, it won't matter that men's basketball is a huge revenue sport and that virtually everyone in the state cares about it while women's sports are big money losers, and almost no one cares.
No, no they cannot. End of discussion.What's going to be interesting is in theory NIL collectives are private "charities". Can the government dictate how a private entity operates? Now, what's going to be even more interesting is discovery. Because to prove that NILs are coerced by schools they'll have to dig into every bit of communication between collectives and university officials (coaches, admins, etc.)
Of course they can't. That was rhetorical.No, no they cannot. End of discussion.
Go to Russia or China if you want Communism.
In theory, universities don't and can't do that. The NIL collective decides how the money gets spent. Period. This is akin to the feds telling the Salvation Army where to direct it's funds or telling United Way you must spend X amount of dollars on a specific segment of the population.What the government can dictate is how much a public university allows to be spent on athletes -- forcing universities to take a more direct role in regulating NIL money to assure it is distributed evenly to men and women. That's what I'm suggesting. Is that Constitutional? If some lefty court says it is.
So what does this mean for the transgenders? That is all that really matters.
Are you that low class that you think making fun of marginalized people is what we're here for? Get that crap out of here.So what does this mean for the transgenders? That is all that really matters.
The only female sport I can even tolerate is golf. Some of those ladies can play but most every other sport is like watching a root canal.
I"m not upset, but the arguments are going to be interesting.Have any of you that are up in arms about this actually read some of the specifics of the complaint? There are things referenced that are legitimate Title IX issues.
For example, the varsity beach volleyball team does not have any facility to use. The university has them play and practice at a public park. And they were unable to practice this week after a dead body was found near the courts. At a school that spends as much on facilities as Oregon, this kind of thing probably shouldn’t be happening. There are also issues with respect to the amount of athletic scholarships awarded to men versus women. It’s okay for someone to question these things and I don’t think this isn’t something worth getting worked up about.
On the NIL front, the issue, if there even is one, will probably come down to the degree to which the school exercises some control over how money is directed towards athletes. If it’s truly an arm’s length relationship between the school and collective, it seems unlikely that there will be any issue.
I also don’t see why folks would be concerned about a court decision that might force schools and collectives to work independently. That would undercut the steps states like Texas are taking to foster coordination between the athletics departments and the collectives. I just don’t see the issue there.
Either way, it seems like the prudent course of action would be to just see how this plays out rather than getting upset about it. You can allege a lot of things in a lawsuit, but that doesn’t mean that they are true or that your theory of the law is one that the courts will agree with.
Just a matter of time before this happened.Ridiculous.
Absolutely ridiculous.
This is capitalism. Not everyone gets the same pay or opportunities, the market determines that. Bo Nix should get more in NIL than the backup setter for the volleyball team. Why is this so hard to understand?
32 selfish athletes wanting to ruin it for everyone- just like Ed O'Bannon with the EA Sports lawsuit.
A true but irrelevant fact in these matters.What's ironic in all of this is the fact that if it weren't for men's sports, women's sports would not exist at universities at all. The funding simply wouldn't be there.
While I agree with your sentiments on this....gubmint will get involved as it always does in these matters and it will screw things up as it always does in these matters.No, no they cannot. End of discussion.
Go to Russia or China if you want Communism.
Just a matter of time before this happened.
They've been watching women's soccer and MEgain Repulsive and her crying about "equal pay".
Agreed. Not upset but definitely rolling my eyes. And I *did* call out the schools for giving women's sponsored sports adequate (if not palatial, depending on their profit/loss) facilities. The whole playing-in-the-park thing and near visible drug users and murdered bodies is unacceptable, regardless of revenue generated or lost.I"m not upset, but the arguments are going to be interesting.
Welp, I guess it's time once again to drag out this gem.A true but irrelevant fact in these matters.
Look at the wnba....without the NBA it would have folded a long time ago.
There's a great Bill Burr bit about trying to push women's sports on the masses when women won't even watch them. How they'd rather watch reality shows in which the purpose of those programs is to tear each other down and shit talk one another. One is built on teamwork and positivity, the other built on hatred, jealousy, and drama. Guess which one women watch in droves?
Having said that...there's been lots of bad takes in terms of NIL and it's seen here occasionally. Can't tell you how many times someone has whined about the NCAA doing something, as if they can reverse a SCOTUS decision or the idea of a cap, which won't occur either.
Good summary in this article.My understanding of the Women's Soccer thing (and I could be wrong)- is that they didn't want equal pay in terms of dollars and cents, but rather an equal percentage of the revenue.
Total hypothetical with fake numbers, but I understood it like if the men's team was making 10% of the $1 Million revenue, they made $100,000.
The women were fighting to get 10% of their revenue as well. For them, 10% of maybe $400,000, they were wanting $40K, which is the same percentage the men got.
If I am understanding that right, that seems fair. Same time commitment, same organization, getting an equal percent (which would equate to much less money) seemed okay for me.
I agree, but moving or altering the structures only puts a band aid on their community. Fix the overarching problem as wellAgreed. Not upset but definitely rolling my eyes. And I *did* call out the schools for giving women's sponsored sports adequate (if not palatial, depending on their profit/loss) facilities. The whole playing-in-the-park thing and near visible drug users and murdered bodies is unacceptable, regardless of revenue generated or lost.
The funny thing about when wnba players cry, they always claim they don't expect to be paid as much as the nba but they just what the same %. Yet, The women actually get paid a much larger percentage of revenue bc there is none in the wnba. They are already making more than the equal %A true but irrelevant fact in these matters.
Look at the wnba....without the NBA it would have folded a long time ago.
It's beach volleyball. It's literally played outside on sand... and mostly at a beach. What kind of facility do they think they need? As for the dead body, they decided to go to college at a state who decriminalized fentanyl. What do they expect?For example, the varsity beach volleyball team does not have any facility to use. The university has them play and practice at a public park. And they were unable to practice this week after a dead body was found near the courts.
That’s my point. With as much money as Oregon throws around on facilities, it’s not unreasonable to expect them to install a couple of sand volleyball courts somewhere on campus. It’s just sand and some nets. There’s really not much excuse for Oregon not having their own court if they field a varsity team.It's beach volleyball. It's literally played outside on sand... and mostly at a beach. What kind of facility do they think they need? As for the dead body, they decided to go to college at a state who decriminalized fentanyl. What do they expect?
Yep. If they want more NIL money they should look more like her. It’s pretty simple.Aren't the highest earning NIL athletes smokeshow girls like Livvy Dunne?
Same here, I will never give 5 cents to NIL, that and unlimited transfer portal have really soured me on college sportsI'm glad they are going after it. I hope there's more and more problems with NIL and the whole system comes crashing down. It's ludicrous you have to bribe players with potentially millions of dollars to come to a school without showing they are even worth it. Should have never been allowed. If they want to make money earlier than talk the NFL into getting a G league and go play there for a few years. I hope it forces legislation that takes advantages away from the richest schools by putting limits on the amounts paid out and puts more rules on these collectives.