ADVERTISEMENT

Roush/Luckett KSR

Apr 30, 2024
61
259
53
Hopefully this is the end of ANYONE taking these two fan boys who know very little about football seriously. This is the third straight year they have spent the game week making fun of Beamer, predicting blowouts etc only to lose three straight seasons.

Bad look to our fan base and university that these guys are actually taken seriously.
 
These two are clowns and no idea why people ever listened to them. I watched about 5 minutes of their content ine time and could tell they were pretending to know football just to build a following.

If you want an online resource to breakdown uk x and o go find van hiles on Twitter and especially YouTube. Ex uk standout player who doesn't hold back and breaks it down in a way casual fans can understand.

I wish many fans would because it would really be beneficial to understanding the general cause of whats going on, both good and bad. So often on here i see fans rightly complaining but just complaining about a general failure but focusing on the wrong thing that caused it. For example complaining about playing zone on 3rd and long.
 
I like Luckett, I usually find something insightful when he breaks things down even if he gets things wrong sometimes (we all do). I’ve heard him be very critical of the program when it’s been warranted so I don’t view him as an unabashed homer.

Roush, on the other hand, is unlistenable to me. He reminds me of some of the awful UT fans I encountered when I lived near Knoxville. Any time he starts talking I just want him to shut up. His trash talk is painful to listen to and I’m a fan of his team! This is nothing personal against him, he may be a great dude, but as a media personality he is about as bad as it gets. I really dislike that he represents the fans and university in some capacity.

I appreciate a lot of KSR’s content and I think they do a good job overall of covering the Cats so it sucks that a big part of their football coverage involves somebody that I find so off putting. I rarely listen to 11 personnel and when I do I keep my finger on the skip button to avoid his buffoonery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: catfan220
Hopefully this is the end of ANYONE taking these two fan boys who know very little about football seriously. This is the third straight year they have spent the game week making fun of Beamer, predicting blowouts etc only to lose three straight seasons.

Bad look to our fan base and university that these guys are actually taken seriously.
Add Ryan lemond too he predicted a Kentucky massacre yesterday anytime ksr tells you who to bet on go the opposite way I have won alot doing that
 
1. I agree on Van Hiles....his breakdown of game films is excellent....especially the defense. But Van Hiles predicted 8-4....
2. Lucket....I like him to be honest. Good analysis of recruiting misses, portal guys and how we handle NIL (who gets what) and how the kids will fill out on the roster....I think he's a good listen.
3. Roush....He's just the assist man to Luckett...I don't mind some trash talk (I feell the same way on Beamer....hate we lose to him so much).
 
There were major whispers all camp that the offensive line was in trouble, yet Luckett, and especially Roush almost assured everyone in these dinky videos that the line was just fine.

first clue they have no idea what they are talking about or a grasp on the game of football.
 
Luckett is really good and I’m hard on media people. Van Hiles has great breakdowns, but takes tooooo long to get to his point and repeats himself too much.
 
These two are clowns and no idea why people ever listened to them. I watched about 5 minutes of their content ine time and could tell they were pretending to know football just to build a following.

If you want an online resource to breakdown uk x and o go find van hiles on Twitter and especially YouTube. Ex uk standout player who doesn't hold back and breaks it down in a way casual fans can understand.

I wish many fans would because it would really be beneficial to understanding the general cause of whats going on, both good and bad. So often on here i see fans rightly complaining but just complaining about a general failure but focusing on the wrong thing that caused it. For example complaining about playing zone on 3rd and long.
Lol, Van Hiles is the biggest fan boy, sunshine pumper of them all. I used to listen to his breakdowns and like them until I realized he would absolutely never criticize Stoops or the coaches no matter what. He always lays the blame at the feet of the players. I can’t take a guy like that with an agenda seriously
 
Hopefully this is the end of ANYONE taking these two fan boys who know very little about football seriously. This is the third straight year they have spent the game week making fun of Beamer, predicting blowouts etc only to lose three straight seasons.

Bad look to our fan base and university that these guys are actually taken seriously.
It all seems like a big joke to them. They hardly ever give any sort of real critique or criticism of Stoops or the program, and when they do it’s a big joke. That’s what I can’t stand about most of the UK media, they never ask any hard hitting questions or do any deep dive into what’s going wrong. Luckett will provide some decent stuff from time to time but I think he just tries to use football buzzwords (11 personnel) to sound football smart. Then Roush is just giving hot takes and one liners, I guess that’s his thing. It’s better than nothing, but it would be nice if they’d actually have some guts and call out the coaches from time to time
 
I did watch videos from numerous prognosticators with no UK association predict essentially the same. This unmitigated disaster was not to be reasonably expected.
 
Luckett is really good and I’m hard on media people. Van Hiles has great breakdowns, but takes tooooo long to get to his point and repeats himself too much.
Trying to watch Hiles took 45 minutes to break down 2 plays - unfortunately just not a good communicator but has outstanding material but lord move quicker
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT