Thats what? 60%? 65%?
Help me out guys; I’m an English major.
Help me out guys; I’m an English major.
Whatever percentage it is, I like the hell out of it 👌Thats what? 60%? 65%?
Help me out guys; I’m an English major.
13 X
--- = ---
21 100
Especially early in a season where most are trying to figure out what is an acceptable shot, you see some ups and downs. I am still very hopeful most on this team gravitate to 40% -45% ish. But you still have someone like Garrrison, who has obviously been told to shoot 3’s who will bring that average down. I don’t think you will see Williams take any.62% (math major)
Other guys have struggled though. I think we are something like 34-79, so 43% as a team. That means everyone else is 21-58, just 36% combined. 36% is acceptable, but I think we are all hoping for better than that.
But on the good note is Robinson's 62%, since last year he had one of the lower 3pt %'s (from the non-C's), I think only Butler was worse.
TY Blue. And yes Brother I know the Jesus equation. Praise be to God!!!From one English major to another bro, learn to cross multiply. It’s a very simple equation and it comes in handier than all other equations put together.
(Well, except for 1 cross + 2 nails = forgiven but you know that one)
Code:13 X --- = --- 21 100
21x = 1300
X = 1300 ÷ 21
X = 61.9
Robinson shot 61.9% from three over two exhibition games.
62% (math major)
Other guys have struggled though. I think we are something like 34-79, so 43% as a team. That means everyone else is 21-58, just 36% combined. 36% is acceptable, but I think we are all hoping for better than that.
But on the good note is Robinson's 62%, since last year he had one of the lower 3pt %'s (from the non-C's), I think only Butler was worse.
I will take 43% all year. I don’t care how it shakes out. With as many as we take that will be phenomenal as a team. That would probably lead the nation.62% (math major)
Other guys have struggled though. I think we are something like 34-79, so 43% as a team. That means everyone else is 21-58, just 36% combined. 36% is acceptable, but I think we are all hoping for better than that.
But on the good note is Robinson's 62%, since last year he had one of the lower 3pt %'s (from the non-C's), I think only Butler was worse.
43% as a team would definitely be in the top in the all time % if im not mistaken the record is 40.9 so definitely no need to complain about 43.62% (math major)
Other guys have struggled though. I think we are something like 34-79, so 43% as a team. That means everyone else is 21-58, just 36% combined. 36% is acceptable, but I think we are all hoping for better than that.
But on the good note is Robinson's 62%, since last year he had one of the lower 3pt %'s (from the non-C's), I think only Butler was worse.
I will take 43% all year. I don’t care how it shakes out. With as many as we take that will be phenomenal as a team. That would probably lead the nation.
43% as a team would definitely be in the top in the all time % if im not mistaken the record is 40.9 so definitely no need to complain about 43.
Damn good info mate.Last season, only the top 2 teams in the nation were above 40% (UK 40.9% and Purdue 40.4%). In the last 15 seasons, there have been an average of about 5 teams at or above 40%. Only 3 seasons have had more than 10 teams at above 40%. A couple of other seasons had about 8 teams, and many years had 4 or less.
For some reason, the 2015/2016, 2016/2017 & 2017/2018 seasons had a ton of good shooting teams with 10, 15, and 19 teams respectively over 40% those seasons.
Combined, those 15 seasons had a total of SIX teams shoot at or above 43%. Even in the years with over 10 teams above 40%, only 2 teams total hit the 43%.
So, 43% would probably be acceptable
Great information, and I figured that would be true. It’s really hard to shoot over 40% as a team.Last season, only the top 2 teams in the nation were above 40% (UK 40.9% and Purdue 40.4%). In the last 15 seasons, there have been an average of about 5 teams at or above 40%. Only 3 seasons have had more than 10 teams at above 40%. A couple of other seasons had about 8 teams, and many years had 4 or less.
For some reason, the 2015/2016, 2016/2017 & 2017/2018 seasons had a ton of good shooting teams with 10, 15, and 19 teams respectively over 40% those seasons.
Combined, those 15 seasons had a total of SIX teams shoot at or above 43%. Even in the years with over 10 teams above 40%, only 2 teams total hit the 43%.
So, 43% would probably be acceptable
FANTASTIC information and research !! If there is no extra work required, other than a little sorting, does your database include the W-L records of the 40% and above teams, including how they fared in the NCAA tournament ??Last season, only the top 2 teams in the nation were above 40% (UK 40.9% and Purdue 40.4%). In the last 15 seasons, there have been an average of about 5 teams at or above 40%. Only 3 seasons have had more than 10 teams at above 40%. A couple of other seasons had about 8 teams, and many years had 4 or less.
For some reason, the 2015/2016, 2016/2017 & 2017/2018 seasons had a ton of good shooting teams with 10, 15, and 19 teams respectively over 40% those seasons.
Combined, those 15 seasons had a total of SIX teams shoot at or above 43%. Even in the years with over 10 teams above 40%, only 2 teams total hit the 43%.
So, 43% would probably be acceptable
FANTASTIC information and research !! If there is no extra work required, other than a little sorting, does your database include the W-L records of the 40% and above teams, including how they fared in the NCAA tournament ??
To me, winning is the bottom line.
To be transparent, I don't have a database. I pulled those numbers in about 5 minutes looking at the stats on ESPN website.
No matter what math you use it = burning down the netsThats what? 60%? 65%?
Help me out guys; I’m an English major.
Thank you very much. Very interesting stuff !! Any observations or conclusions to be drawn ??That being said... quick glance at those same stats:
P5 teams in the top 25 of 3pt %
23-24: 8 teams; UK, Purdue, Colorado, Northwestern, Baylor, Duke, Bama, Utah
22-23: 3 teams; Mich St, Penn St, AZ
21-22: 5 teams; VA Tech, Purdue, Notre Dame, Mich St, Syracuse
20-21: 5 teams; Baylor, Iowa, Michigan, Oregon, FL St
All teams in the top 25 of 3pt%
Elite Eight teams:
23-24: Duke, Bama, Purdue
22-23: Gonzaga
21-22: None
20-21: Michigan, Baylor
Sweet Sixteen:
23-24: EE teams (Duke, Bama, Purdue),
22-23: Mich St, Gonzaga
21-22: None
20-21: EE teams (Michigan, Baylor), Oregon, FL St