1. Duke likely gets Giles AND Tatum. That locks them into the #1 class.
2. We haven't gotten Bolden, whom you listed. We did get SKJ, who you didn't list?
3. Gabriel will be very nice. But, I hate how fans always say a kid will be better than the other guy who we were much more excited about 2-3 weeks ago.
I'm glad somebody else can see the reality that IF Duke lands Giles to go with Tatum they are going to be #1. They would have Rivals #2, #3, #10, and #41 player's. I think the problem is that we want to try to make the volume argument. So assuming we land Fox, Bolden, and Monk which is admittedly a huge IF. We would have the Rivals #5, #6, #16, #17, #26. That's not enough to surpass having two of the top three players in the nation and 3 of the top ten. It's like what we did the year we landed Cousins and Wall in the same class except this time it's Duke pulling it off. I love the team Cal is putting together but if we're being truly objective if Duke lands Giles we won't have a better class. BTW I'm not saying that either Giles or Tatum are as good players as Cousins and Wall were as high school seniors because I don't think they are. But rather drawing a parallel that if given the choice you want the quality of two elite top three players in a class rather than the quantity of 5 or 6 five star Mcdonald's All Americans.
Last edited: