Those stats qualify as "aint that great"
I'll take 38% from 3 all day. Equates to almost 60% from 2.
Those stats qualify as "aint that great"
You just dont say that coming in
I'll take 38% from 3 all day. Equates to almost 60% from 2.
It's a quote. It doesn't define him unless it's repetitive like your dumbass postsHe is gonna be great..but that was not a good quote
yep, thank you for proving my point.
You guys might want to temper your expectations for shooting ability from our PGs just a smidge. Brandon Knight was a good shooter, stacking up reasonably well against our two recent STAR shooting guards. LOL SMH
Knight 46% / 38% / 80%
Monk 45% / 40% / 82%
Murray 45% / 42% / 77%
This thread is beginning to bring out a fact that, IMHO, has been overlooked for much too long, and that is -- Brandon Knight may be the best PG we've had during the Calipari era, and if not "the best", he is certainly in the top 2 or 3. As far as I'm concerned, Wall and Fox are the only others in the same class with Brandon Knight -- and it's not a lay-down for me as to which of those is the best among the three.
Good point. I think we should take more seriously what a 17 year old says.He is gonna be great..but that was not a good quote
i think you know better than to include ulismyman as part of "we". lolI can't believe we're already starting to crap on players who aren't even here yet.