ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
The only hesitation i have about removing judges is the perception. The perception concern is when dems regain power, they will cite this precedent as a reason to remove judges actually applying the law.

Fk perception. Proceed by constitutional authority and keep laying out why. This is not shooting from the hip sht this time. This has long been planned out.

Any extreme step you take will just be adopted and bastardized by the dems.

It's already been "bastardized by the dems." Look at the case year.

I hope we keep the heat on. They owe us tens of billions, at least.

Imo that's going to be a tough sell to putin. These very resources are why our shadow government started this war. Hell its why they removed zs predecessor to begin with. So Putin fought this long game for years. Cant imagine him giving it up so easily.

Same, except the resources are only a third maybe of why NATO, the dems and rinos, and the rest started this war.
 
His "legislative process" is asking the Ukrainian and US oligarchs what he should do. He's literally a frkn jester. He's a "comedian" playing a part, not someone to be negotiated with in earnest. You don't make deals with the assistant manager or dishwasher
Putin parrot
 
097c9f0621838cd102940b6a41e58bbd.jpeg
 
wow. interesting. rfk really has his eye on things


We told yall it was about bringing back feudalism. That is THE end goal of all of this sht the globalists and their loyalists have been doing here and worldwide. So many steps along the way have been taken just for this tipping point we're at now.

Who benefits from the US as it was founded being eliminated? Who led the world through the dark ages? Who turned and managed the world from independent clans and tribes of self-sustaining communities into fiefdoms with nobility and royalty at the command of a few people?

They are the same people that stole resources, gave us paper for our precious metals, divided countries, and conspired to flood them all with unvetted and unrestrained people that have no regard for our laws and our rights. Look at the list of groups profiting from and facilitating it.

THEY ARE NOT NEWBIES.

WE ARE THE NOOBS. We've only been around for a few hundred years. This sht goes back more than 1260 years. We discussed this sht on WCF and other forums 25 years ago now. Some of the guys I talk to regularly offline - that EVEN I thought were frkn crazy "conspiracy" guys - were talking about this sht in 98, 2001, and since. I started listening more as each thing started to be confirmed.

None of this is coincidental or random
 
Another egregious example of government fraud/waste to the tune of $2 Billion to Stacey Abrams' 'charitable organizations' alone, with a total of $20B to several other entities with, presumably, like-minded political leanings. 20 BILLION dollars. Blatant thievery that would still be going unchecked had the voters elected Kamala & Co.

I'm left with a question: what about Stacey Abrams instills so much love and devotion from the DNC? She's lost every election she's been in. She's a strident, way Far Left voice that turns about 60% of the country off, she's an 'election denier' (her governor's race at least), doesn't present herself as particularly bright and, with the above paragraph in mind, could very well be a criminal. How is she some bright light that the DNC believes will be a big player on the national political scene? Thus far, she's a complete joke.

My assumption is that the Dems would like to win elections again. Hanging your hat on Kamala, Tim Walz, Buttigieg, Abrams, et al doesn't seem like the best strategy to do so. Is the bench so bereft of talent that these are their BEST shots at winning elections? If so, they are well and truly f*cked.




 
That’s Trump #1 reasoning. Don’t prosecute Hilary so the country can move on and not have it seem like the sitting president is just targeting his political opponents.

Democrats have no morals or respect for precedent. Trump needs to do what’s best for the country even if democrats will argue they now have precedent to use various methods to destroy it.

Hopefully Trump #2 can destroy them so thoroughly, regaining control with the corrupt grip they had over the entire establishment will be incredibly difficult.

To really achieve getting rid of the dem corruption, its at least a 12 year job. That wont eradicate it but at least get it to a manageable position such that the public wont stand for their nonsense.

Anything less than 3 terms of anti corruption movement will all be for naught. Even if public opinion is anywhere close to defensible, they will completely just take over. It will be like the 2020 election where they blatantly fixed it then destroyed anyone who dare speak up about the obvious.
 
The UN wants all our Money but then wants to tell us how it gets spent. They can kick rocks for all I care. Their alignment with the WEF and globalist tyranny is antithetical to American values and any liberal on here who thinks otherwise has an anti-American agenda of their own.
 
Our forefathers were brilliant people but it's so dumb that you get a say in anything while contributing nothing. I thought it was bullshit that women could vote for someone with war implications while men were the only ones who could get drafted into a war, and I think it's absurd that people who pay no income taxes/live off the government can have a say in anything with financial consequences for those who actually produce.
 
Another egregious example of government fraud/waste to the tune of $2 Billion to Stacey Abrams' 'charitable organizations' alone, with a total of $20B to several other entities with, presumably, like-minded political leanings. 20 BILLION dollars. Blatant thievery that would still be going unchecked had the voters elected Kamala & Co.

I'm left with a question: what about Stacey Abrams instills so much love and devotion from the DNC? She's lost every election she's been in. She's a strident, way Far Left voice that turns about 60% of the country off, she's an 'election denier' (her governor's race at least), doesn't present herself as particularly bright and, with the above paragraph in mind, could very well be a criminal. How is she some bright light that the DNC believes will be a big player on the national political scene? Thus far, she's a complete joke.

My assumption is that the Dems would like to win elections again. Hanging your hat on Kamala, Tim Walz, Buttigieg, Abrams, et al doesn't seem like the best strategy to do so. Is the bench so bereft of talent that these are their BEST shots at winning elections? If so, they are well and truly f*cked.





I wondered the same. All i can figure is she was able to provide operatives or other means to fix the state election outcome in 2020. Thats the only thing she offers worth anything approaching that value.

Iirc the prosecutors down there that were on trump were also involved in usaid ngo grants. Same with the one in nyc and somewhere else.

We know in other countries usaid had a judicial and prosecutor outreach program to sway or install friendly judges to execute "transitional justice". Thats a fancy way of saying put your opponents in jail so they cant cause you troubles next election term. This is all out there. The cia hacks or buys intel on opponents, feeds it to the occrp who runs a story, then friendly prosecutors pick it up where its overseen by friendly judges.

Again this is all out there on their own web pages as pointed out by benz. We know they did this in several countries after they installed the president they wanted. So You can see their fingerprints all over the trump prosecutions and those of his advisors.

Also in Brazil iirc usaid bought and shipped brand new electronic vote counting machines for them to use in an election where the preferred candidate squeaked out a victory . Sound familiar?
 
Fk perception. Proceed by constitutional authority and keep laying out why. This is not shooting from the hip sht this time. This has long been planned out.



It's already been "bastardized by the dems." Look at the case year.



Same, except the resources are only a third maybe of why NATO, the dems and rinos, and the rest started this war.

I understand and agree with all that however this process must be surgical. We cant just ram it through and give them defensible cover for when they do it. There are clear methodical mechanisms to get this appropriately done. We cant just cite to the mandate.
 
Can’t believe people ever bought the “long covid” bs but again, can’t believe people ever believed any of it. This info been pretty much available for 4 years now at least enough to question it.



And here I thought long Covid was some fake white woman fibromyalgia bullshit. Turns out it AIDS.
 
Can’t believe people ever bought the “long covid” bs but again, can’t believe people ever believed any of it. This info been pretty much available for 4 years now at least enough to question it.

So glad my blood is pure from that shit. I prefer to taint my blood with good beer and Bourbon.
 
Can’t believe people ever bought the “long covid” bs but again, can’t believe people ever believed any of it. This info been pretty much available for 4 years now at least enough to question it.


There's a video where a manufacturer admitted to using HIV to create the spike protein production process for the jab, so it makes sense. Wonder if the others did the same
 
Last edited:
Our forefathers were brilliant people but it's so dumb that you get a say in anything while contributing nothing. I thought it was bullshit that women could vote for someone with war implications while men were the only ones who could get drafted into a war, and I think it's absurd that people who pay no income taxes/live off the government can have a say in anything with financial consequences for those who actually produce.
Wouldn't hang that one of the OGs. In 1776 only property owners could vote.

In 1787 the Fed left it up to the states to decide.

In 1830 most states had dropped the mandate and political parties began to form.

It was all downhill from there until 1913 when it fell off the cliff as there was a call to honor the popular vote on US senate seats. Now here we are.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT