ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
The reality surprising thing to me is how little actual social media blowback there is this time around. His first term my socials were full of loud and proud libs crucifying his every move with several comments all agreeing.

This time there are very few posts and in those posts very few comments. Just the same handful all having their own bitch session. Everyone else just posting about basic nonsense like weather, recipes, sports, etc.

Its even crazier because a huge chunk of my socials are liberals just based on my profession. Even so, hardly any complaining or pearl clutching.

Woke is dead. Thats why i encourage people not to engage on socials. Just let then scream into the void amongst the handful of remaining wokes.
are you on bluesky or whatever it is called? i'm not, but suspect they're having over-the-top scream fests over there.
 
have you noticed ... the libs on here never laugh at things that are truly funny and they rarely, if ever, add anything that is PURPOSEFULLY funny. They never add cute shit with animals or children. Instead, ALL they post is vitriolic hate.

What terrible lives they must have. Don't be confused, that is not a sympathetic note for them ... quite the opposite.
 
The answers are short, common sense...the truth.

Russ Vought. Office of Management and Budget.















Bernie gets schooled:






"We have able-bodied, working adults on the program that are benefiting from a higher match rate than the population that it was originally designed for"

"[State governments are] not looking at improper payments"


(Bernie quickly jumps in to stop him from saying more inconvenient facts)
 
I'm with In Pursuit of Truth here. Wholly unnecessary. Sign me up for actual infrastructure.


Couple things.

1. This is THEIR money (which Elon says the full funding isn't there yet from sofi)
Let them invest as much as they want in ai on their own. I'm sure we sweetened the pot with regulatory assurances, tax abatements, whatever.

2. The 1+ trillion we taxpayers already approved and squandered by Biden can perhaps still be rescued now, and that rural broadband and charging stations, etc, can now be efficiently managed amd actually come online.
 
Saw these last couple days of Vance and his family and it's clear who the 'normal' people are and who are the weirdos. Vance takes his kids everywhere and they act like kids.











And Trump's kids seem like they are the complete opposite of the people who hate them...good, decent people with a sense of humor (the left is humorless). Ivanka doesn't know Barron is behind her and has a funny reaction. And she looks great!


Missed seeing Kimberly Guilfoyle. Where was she?
 


You support the people that do support pardoning violent offenders. Especially ones that committed violence against children, women and cops.

You're too filled with TDS to see it. And it is fun to watch you meltdown...
I condemned Biden's pardon.
I was right about you. Thanks for proving my point.
Is it warm up in there? Bet you can almost taste the leftover Big Mac he had for breakfast.
 
have you noticed ... the libs on here never laugh at things that are truly funny and they rarely, if ever, add anything that is PURPOSEFULLY funny. They never add cute shit with animals or children. Instead, ALL they post is vitriolic hate.

What terrible lives they must have. Don't be confused, that is not a sympathetic note for them ... quite the opposite.
They feel like they are victims of everything. They don’t know how to laugh and have fun.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: sambowieshin
"(i) Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 (Equal Employment Opportunity), is hereby revoked. For 90 days from the date of this order, Federal contractors may continue to comply with the regulatory scheme in effect on January 20, 2025."

How can ya'll see this and think this is right?

Conservatives are literally twisting the EEO and calling it DEI, hence the ban, but the EEO literally "prohibited discrimination in hiring and employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin."
 
nope I never said it. wrong again. simple sam keeps going back to muh stocky marky go uppey. you used to at least be honest. what happened? did your wife call you "donald" too like vh? Sad.


And simple sam has zero understanding of how inflation drives a nominal number, but when people can purchase LESS, then that is not a good thing. I suggest you spend some time on Girth's recap of the market the past 4 years.
but 50% of the money printed was under Trump, only 10% under Biden. Ya'll blame Biden for inflation but Trump contributed greatly to it.
 
are you on bluesky or whatever it is called? i'm not, but suspect they're having over-the-top scream fests over there.

No just the usual ones. Most of my friends, especially the vocal ones, on there are liberal just because of my profession. Even with that, very little outrage. Big difference from last time.
 
"(i) Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 (Equal Employment Opportunity), is hereby revoked. For 90 days from the date of this order, Federal contractors may continue to comply with the regulatory scheme in effect on January 20, 2025."

How can ya'll see this and think this is right?

Conservatives are literally twisting the EEO and calling it DEI, hence the ban, but the EEO literally "prohibited discrimination in hiring and employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin."
Having run business that was a federal contractor, I cheer it. EEO required a bunch of onerous reporting and was used to seek fines if they thought that you weren't doing enough in the name of diversity. They could even suspend your government contracts if they saw fit. My business was in male a dominated manufacturing industry. Women weren't generally interested in the jobs or quit after discovering that they didn't like the work. We were constantly having to explain why we didn't have more female workers. Some workers would also make false. EEO claims to retaliate against managers they didn't like. I am all for equal opportunity but the EEOC was often used to try to get guaranteed results based on race, sex,etc.
 
Last edited:
Gh2wPj0XQAAMpoD


Went private, of course.
 
"(i) Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 (Equal Employment Opportunity), is hereby revoked. For 90 days from the date of this order, Federal contractors may continue to comply with the regulatory scheme in effect on January 20, 2025."

How can ya'll see this and think this is right?

Conservatives are literally twisting the EEO and calling it DEI, hence the ban, but the EEO literally "prohibited discrimination in hiring and employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin."


I don’t think the federal government should be required to show preference to people based on race or gender when handing out contracts. Should treat everyone equally.
 
"(i) Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 (Equal Employment Opportunity), is hereby revoked. For 90 days from the date of this order, Federal contractors may continue to comply with the regulatory scheme in effect on January 20, 2025."

How can ya'll see this and think this is right?

Conservatives are literally twisting the EEO and calling it DEI, hence the ban, but the EEO literally "prohibited discrimination in hiring and employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin."
LOL GD, you have always been one of the most sheltered and naive people on this forum. You're a white male and the most hated person by the left while being so blind to it.

You're so clueless that you have been completely unaware how whites have been discriminated against in hiring and admissions. Asians too. "bUt tHeY cANt dO tHaT" Okay, bud.
 
Last edited:
"(i) Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 (Equal Employment Opportunity), is hereby revoked. For 90 days from the date of this order, Federal contractors may continue to comply with the regulatory scheme in effect on January 20, 2025."

How can ya'll see this and think this is right?

Conservatives are literally twisting the EEO and calling it DEI, hence the ban, but the EEO literally "prohibited discrimination in hiring and employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin."

No one is twisting anything....the DEI labels from employers were everywhere. And unless your comprehension is limited, DEI discriminated on its face against those who were perhaps more qualified. Do tell how hiring based on merit and qualifications is discriminatory?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT