Actors can't get paid for appearances unless their face is visible on screen?
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Actors can't get paid for appearances unless their face is visible on screen?
If you were too retarded to try to sneak into the US before today we definitely don’t need you here.
By the way, where is Pocahontas?
Sprucing up her resume with more fictitious heritage no doubt
Hhhhhmmmmm … while I was not a fan of Trump’s speech, I think your rebuff is simplistic. Lazarus was raised from the dead for the glory of God, but … then he died. Death is part of this existence, as it currently exists. All of us die (but for maybe 2 people in the Bible). God does not promise otherwise. In fact, it is talked about a great deal in scripture. We are but a puff, a blink, on the timeline of existence.
So, God may thwart at assassin’s bullet for His glory. God may permit an assassin’s bullet for His glory. The victim of that attack, however, ends up at the same place as Trump. Dead and judged.
To say Trump’s comment is wrong just because someone else died in that moment is simplistic.
Crazy that Obama showed up to watch Hitler take over. 🤣
Yeah, but that voice would kill a woody faster than an ice bath.
Since he admitted guilt, they should remove his pension!
It ended with the constitution
Sure would like to see another post from the guy that swore up and down President Trump would not be inaugurated but would be stopped at the podium and arrested or something like that..
Sure would give him a click now...
Sure would give him a click now...
Basically spells out everything he did. All of these “pardons” are an admission of guilt. Resident Libs, you see it now? You see how it was all about control and most definitely not about what’s best for the health and welfare of the American citizens?
Agreed! I'm not really an emotional guy, but I got misty eyed when they sang the Battle Hymn. Just beautiful.
Waiting for the talking points to come out - Maddow isn’t on till later
If he is still walking the streets by Saturday this presidency will have been a failure!
What irks them even more is the notion that God would use someone as flawed and imperfect as Trump for any greater purpose.
After all, their worldview is one of reparations and “social justice”. That justice must come from man alone.
No more gay flags on federal buildings for four more years!
haha
Here is clip of Elon's talk:
Here is clip of Elon's talk:
Last edited:
She's a 4 at BEST. She had plastic surgery to fix her jacked up, crooked mouth and she got a makeover. And she still looks like ass.
They also cannot plead the fifth now as well.
Joe Biden pardons give allies potential 5th Amendment headache
The pardoned individuals, including Anthony Fauci and Liz Cheney, may lose the ability to invoke their Fifth Amendment privileges when testifying.
www.newsweek.com
she was on a little while ago. it was almost worth recording. glorious
Here’s a quick summation of the 10 EO for immigration. Mentions a few other things below. Still cannot find a comprehensive list, but color me impressed at the speed things are moving.
I don't want to talk to her.
Hr pardoned so many people, I checked just to see if I was pardoned.
This was copied from the case of Burdick vs United States. There is a mile of stuff to read if you want. I figure it takes up to much space to post.
After President Gerald Ford left the White House in 1977, close friends said that the President privately justified his pardon of Richard Nixon by carrying in his wallet a portion of the text of the Burdick decision, which stated that a pardon carries an imputation of guilt and that acceptance carries a confession of guilt.[6] Ford made reference to the Burdick decision in his post-pardon written statement furnished to the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives on October 17, 1974.[7] However, the reference related only to the portion of Burdick that supported the proposition that the Constitution does not limit the pardon power to cases of convicted offenders or even indicted offenders.[7][8]
Justice Joseph McKenna delivered the opinion of the Court in favor of Burdick. The Court ruled Burdick was entitled to reject the pardon for a number of reasons, including the implicit admission of guilt and possibly objectionable terms contained in a conditional pardon. As Burdick was entitled to reject the pardon, he was also entitled to assert his right against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment.
Although theIn Loranc Supreme Court's opinion stated that a pardon carries "an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it,"[2] this was part of the Court's dictum for the case.[4] Whether the acceptance of a pardon constitutes an admission of guilt by the recipient is disputed. e v. Commandant, USDB (2021) the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that "there is no confession and Lorance does not otherwise lose his right to petition for habeas corpus relief for his court-martial conviction and sentence. The case was remanded for further action not inconsistent with the court’s opinion."[5]
After President Gerald Ford left the White House in 1977, close friends said that the President privately justified his pardon of Richard Nixon by carrying in his wallet a portion of the text of the Burdick decision, which stated that a pardon carries an imputation of guilt and that acceptance carries a confession of guilt.[6] Ford made reference to the Burdick decision in his post-pardon written statement furnished to the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives on October 17, 1974.[7] However, the reference related only to the portion of Burdick that supported the proposition that the Constitution does not limit the pardon power to cases of convicted offenders or even indicted offenders.[7][8]
Justice Joseph McKenna delivered the opinion of the Court in favor of Burdick. The Court ruled Burdick was entitled to reject the pardon for a number of reasons, including the implicit admission of guilt and possibly objectionable terms contained in a conditional pardon. As Burdick was entitled to reject the pardon, he was also entitled to assert his right against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment.
Although theIn Loranc Supreme Court's opinion stated that a pardon carries "an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it,"[2] this was part of the Court's dictum for the case.[4] Whether the acceptance of a pardon constitutes an admission of guilt by the recipient is disputed. e v. Commandant, USDB (2021) the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that "there is no confession and Lorance does not otherwise lose his right to petition for habeas corpus relief for his court-martial conviction and sentence. The case was remanded for further action not inconsistent with the court’s opinion."[5]
JD’s face when Trump went back to his offer to Pelosi of 10k soldiers was the face of the kids when Grandpa tells the same story he told five minutes ago.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Anyone like me , able to tolerate a loss better than ….
- Latest: WallMashKyBall
-
-
-
-