Same way I do with many things, just use covid as the recent example. Knowing my belief is the best one supported and explained by the evidence. And having the courage and confidence to be secure in my belief.
The bandwagon fallacy encourages me to cut against the grain. It DOES not work on me pretty much anywhere.
But back to my point ... the courts would not listen to the evidence and so the facts were played in the court of public opinion. And why did the left's mantra change (all at the same time, which is weird) from "most safe and secure" to "well, not enough fraud to change things" to "yeah, there was a lot of fraud, but no victories in court"? Why did their mantra continue to change, move the goalposts, or lower the standard? [Because the public evidence does not support their conclusions.] You can try to convince me otherwise, but avoid bandwagon fallacies or appeals to authority please.
Last edited:
