ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Caveman style is to Roman Fresco as Roman Frescoes are to the Internet? If you are trying to equate a small handful of "Roman Frescoes" to the Internet porn today....you are an idiot. You may wish to educate yourself as to what was considered appropriate dress for a female back in Rome. I do not recall Frescoes of their females in bikinis or even exposing their legs in short pants or skirts.


In early Rome both men and women wore togas but at some point, the toga became a male-only garment. For most of ancient Roman history, respectable Roman women wore the stola — a long dress that reached down to the feet that was worn over a tunic. The stola was usually sleeveless and could be made out of a range of materials, though it had traditionally been made out of wool, like the toga. Roman women wore a cloak called the palla over it when they went out in public.
You're a nutter, man. From a literal Roman villa:

GettyImages-520720135-2-ba177d7.jpg


That's just to refute your obvious bikini stupidity. There are tons of actually pornographic ones, any cursory search will show you. Doubt posting them would go over well though.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: warrior-cat
This is why Trump needs someone like these - Youngkin/Pompeo/Burgum- to expand his votes:

"President Biden’s decline and the Democratic Party’s turmoil have remade the dynamics of the election in a way that makes Donald Trump the favorite. The chaos also presents Mr. Trump with an opening to persuade more voters that he’s the safer choice, especially with his decision on a running mate.

As the GOP convention nears, and voters focus on the election, the race remains closer than it should be given Mr. Biden’s infirmities. Swing voters still worry about Mr. Trump and the possibility of four more years of turmoil. The former President can help his campaign, and the country, by projecting stability and calm."

"The opportunity is there to present a reassuring alternative if Mr. Trump wants to take it. And he has a timely opening to send that message with his vice presidential choice in the next week. Now leading in the polls, he doesn’t need an attack-dog VP or someone to rally his core voters. He needs a choice who shows mature judgment and has the ability to appeal to anxious and undecided voters.

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin would bring governing experience in a swing state that may be competitive this year. He has business experience and would speak to suburban voters. Mr. Youngkin hasn’t been on Mr. Trump’s short list, but the race has fundamentally changed since the debate. Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has a reputation for competence and broad foreign-policy experience. Of those on the mooted short list, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum also brings executive experience and a history of business success and knowledge about the economy.

Marco Rubio is a more familiar national figure, but as a Senator he has no executive experience and his past criticism of Mr. Trump will play in a loop on TV ads and social media. The need for stability and experience should eliminate the young MAGA-in-a-hurry types like Sen. J.D. Vance or Members of the House. They lack experience and wouldn’t be a reassuring contrast to Vice President Kamala Harris.

"Mr. Trump needs a running mate who causes voters to stop and say: Yes, that person could be a good President."

 
With Biden adamantly refusing to step aside, would the Democrat Party basically tank this election to punish him for not going along? These people are as mean-spirited as they come, they use every means necessary to punish those who disagree with them and they hold grudges. Since no one believes Biden can win again after his disastrous debate performance (and subsequent ones like 'Philadelphia pushed me over the line when I ran for the Senate' - uh, Joe, you were Delaware's Senator, not Pennsylvania's), would 'the party' just abandon him to a crushing and embarrassing defeat as an example to others who would dare go against the party leadership? Would they forfeit the ability to continue to sabotage the US for another 4 years to teach a valuable lesson to anyone who dares go against the party groupthink? If they can hold at least one House of Congress, they can effectively stop most things Trump may do to reverse the damage they've caused. If letting Biden get crushed this November, they end all resistance to the party's power, maybe it'd be worth it to them. Is there a possibility they'd do that?
No. They need the House or Senate to keep their future control alive.
 
Have you been to any ancient sites? Dicks everywhere. Go walk around Pompeii, there are dick signs pointing to the brothels all over town. That conservative moralizers railed against before Christ was born.

Yeah sure, they're torn over transgenderism too, like JK Rowling right? 🤮
We have one on here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ that trolls like a harlot so...
 
If they had wanted to decide it on the merits for the plaintiff they would've just not heard the case and left the 5th Circuit ruling in place which did that. Deciding to take it up and overrule it in and of itself indicates SCOTUS's position on it, regardless of which mechanism they used to overturn the lower court ruling.
False.
 
Last edited:
This is why Trump needs someone like these - Youngkin/Pompeo/Burgum- to expand his votes:

"President Biden’s decline and the Democratic Party’s turmoil have remade the dynamics of the election in a way that makes Donald Trump the favorite. The chaos also presents Mr. Trump with an opening to persuade more voters that he’s the safer choice, especially with his decision on a running mate.

As the GOP convention nears, and voters focus on the election, the race remains closer than it should be given Mr. Biden’s infirmities. Swing voters still worry about Mr. Trump and the possibility of four more years of turmoil. The former President can help his campaign, and the country, by projecting stability and calm."

"The opportunity is there to present a reassuring alternative if Mr. Trump wants to take it. And he has a timely opening to send that message with his vice presidential choice in the next week. Now leading in the polls, he doesn’t need an attack-dog VP or someone to rally his core voters. He needs a choice who shows mature judgment and has the ability to appeal to anxious and undecided voters.

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin would bring governing experience in a swing state that may be competitive this year. He has business experience and would speak to suburban voters. Mr. Youngkin hasn’t been on Mr. Trump’s short list, but the race has fundamentally changed since the debate. Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has a reputation for competence and broad foreign-policy experience. Of those on the mooted short list, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum also brings executive experience and a history of business success and knowledge about the economy.

Marco Rubio is a more familiar national figure, but as a Senator he has no executive experience and his past criticism of Mr. Trump will play in a loop on TV ads and social media. The need for stability and experience should eliminate the young MAGA-in-a-hurry types like Sen. J.D. Vance or Members of the House. They lack experience and wouldn’t be a reassuring contrast to Vice President Kamala Harris.

"Mr. Trump needs a running mate who causes voters to stop and say: Yes, that person could be a good President."


So, Ben Carson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vhcat70
You're a nutter, man. From a literal Roman villa:

GettyImages-520720135-2-ba177d7.jpg


That's just to refute your obvious bikini stupidity. There are tons of actually pornographic ones, any cursory search will show you. Doubt posting them would go over well though.
Those are a 2 piece. Not bikinis. And IIRC those are a depiction of female athletes participating in sports. Not in your weird porno driven mind.
 
Last edited:
Those are a 2 piece. Not bikinis. And IIRC those are a depiction of female athletes participating in sports. Not in your weird porno driven mind.
The woman to the left was cropped out because she's topless. Like I said in that very post that was an example to refute your ignorance on ancient dress. The pornography is much more lurid.
 
The woman to the left was cropped out because she's topless. Like I said in that very post that was an example to refute your ignorance on ancient dress. The pornography is much more lurid.

Dude, conflating modern porn, accessible on pornhub and the like with Roman frescoes drawings is absurd, even for your silly commie ass.

And I'm a big fan of porn and such, but come on. That's just stupid, and you look like a fool arguing otherwise.

But, commie usually equals fool, sooooo
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrH. Lecter
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT