Next up- Maxine says the internets are racist... just like those pesky IDs
Last edited:
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Next up- Maxine says the internets are racist... just like those pesky IDs
You really can't be this stupid. Who unscrews the toothpaste for you? Ffs
You can't discount the job he's done for FL. Who was the last governor who was better? I don't doubt he'd do better in debates in 2028 than he did last time. Plenty more experience.
Dude, stop. She's a lefty. She doesn't belong on that podium. Trump should rehire Kaylee.
To be fair he's not the best debater, but also in fairness he had zero shot with Trump waiting in the wings.
These House races that are yet to be called have me a little nervous. For instance, on the Senate side, the GOP candidate in Nevada had been leading until lately, now his opponent is slightly ahead.
GOP currently has 206 seats, and of the remaining ones, I see the seven where the GOP candidate is ahead with a comfortable lead given the % of the vote that's been counted. That gives you 213, or five short of a bare majority. There are 10 other seats where the GOP candidate has the lead, but not my much, especially given the % of the vote in.
AK- 1 seat (democrat incumbent but state leans GOP)
AZ- 3 seats (toss ups)
CA- 6 seats (these are obviously in GOP-leaning districts, but are still close and hard to say what the final outcome will be in some)
So, that's a max GOP seat total of 223. Not much margin of error. You win just half, you're at a bare majority, which is super dicey given the the lack of party discipline in the last Congress. The House is key because it has subpoena power.
There are also a few seats where the democrat candidate is leading by a narrow margin and that haven't been called, but from what I can see, the final outcome isn't likely to change. Maybe the one in western MD, I guess, but slim odds on that.
On the Senate side, looks like it'll almost assuredly be 53-47 GOP; outside shot at 54-46.
GOP currently has 206 seats, and of the remaining ones, I see the seven where the GOP candidate is ahead with a comfortable lead given the % of the vote that's been counted. That gives you 213, or five short of a bare majority. There are 10 other seats where the GOP candidate has the lead, but not my much, especially given the % of the vote in.
AK- 1 seat (democrat incumbent but state leans GOP)
AZ- 3 seats (toss ups)
CA- 6 seats (these are obviously in GOP-leaning districts, but are still close and hard to say what the final outcome will be in some)
So, that's a max GOP seat total of 223. Not much margin of error. You win just half, you're at a bare majority, which is super dicey given the the lack of party discipline in the last Congress. The House is key because it has subpoena power.
There are also a few seats where the democrat candidate is leading by a narrow margin and that haven't been called, but from what I can see, the final outcome isn't likely to change. Maybe the one in western MD, I guess, but slim odds on that.
On the Senate side, looks like it'll almost assuredly be 53-47 GOP; outside shot at 54-46.
Last edited:
Vance would eat him up in a debate…and he cannot/highly doubt will take on Vance in 2028.
He had major funding last time.
He will have Elon, Thiel, Heritage, AFP, etc all against him in 2028.
He had major funding last time.
He will have Elon, Thiel, Heritage, AFP, etc all against him in 2028.
Can't get voters limited to taxpayers and property owners with that law place, can you? So why is it stupid to tell OC why he can't have that with that law there? I'll wait.
This might be my favorite article ever. Per Vox, Kamala lost to Donald Trump because of a global trend against incumbents. I wonder if they know that Kamala has never been president but Trump has. What are they even talking about? Do logical argument structures even matter to these people?
This has to be AI, right? @WayneDougan
www.vox.com
This has to be AI, right? @WayneDougan
The global trend that pushed Donald Trump to victory
Incumbents everywhere are doing poorly. America just proved it’s not exceptional.
www.vox.com
Last edited:
223 is better than 221 today. But count on the Crazy Eight to gum things up to slow down change votes. They'll probably start with wanting a different Speaker.
And that will screw him in 2032…because he will have pissed all of them off for having to spend money on against the VP
Yep. I think dems have to know they can't run a California liberal in working class states. Newsoms schtick won't work in Scranton or Dearborn.
Twitter/X... the same place where I told you what the real poll numbers were and that Kamala was bleeding support from Latinos and Black males.
How in the world can you compare 1 day post election with the absolute Covid era week long counts and the events of JANUARY. You need to sit back and watch your sides radicals and what they do to stop this transfer. Tish James already is doing her part. DC isnt boarded up out of fear of the GOP.
You need to LEARN from your loss. NOBODY but a minority of the electorate gives a damn about J6 and your obsession with the narrative....that didn't work. So LEARN from this. Your J6 narrative failed.
One easy lesson. Just give it a try. Say this...its a start....say "A Man cannot have a baby." Just set yourself free. Say it. Grow.
OR you could simply rewrite the law. The language is kind of vague anyway. Are you suggesting minorities pay no taxes nor own property?
Houthies have called cease fire as well.... Kind of wild he hasn't even been sworn in yet. Sammysdad has to be so pissed that fewer people are going to die the next 4 years.
McCormick's PA Senate race just ticked from +29.9K to +31.5K. Number changed as I watched.
The guy in Nevada talking to Baris was saying the dnc in Nevada has gone into a civil war weeks ago. The Democrat Socialist basically took over the party in 2020 and has been running off all the moderate Dems in the party. That guy quit 2 weeks before the election and said he was 50/50 on voting Trump. LOL.
She was good during impeachment too. She torched some people.
Last edited:
I agree that Vance will have an edge over DeSantis, but DeSantis is still a better debater than anyone not named Vance. His two problems this time were a) Trump sucked all the air out of the room and b) the media literally IGNORED him, which is a nail in the coffin.
Lara Trump on pbd podcast this morning said she thinks we keep the house. She said numbers are looking good and dems aren't as confident as they were yesterday.
Oh btw, Tester got CREAMED by Sheehy. About time.
Baris is a numbers guy. He just looks at data.
Nobody cares about your stupid man/baby lesson.
It's not a small electorate... It's almost half the country. Many still care what happened J6th but a slight majority currently cared more about immigration and inflation.
Dems thought the country was in their pocket after 2 term Obama.
Don't read more into this win than $$ people have in their pocket and a desire to control the border more effectively.
Pubs better deliver or they will be on the way out again in 2 years.
Top mma fighters don't get into street fights.... People know they'd lose and just treat them with respect.
Biden did some good things like infrastructure funding and NATO expansion.
He F'd up on Afghan withdrawal and the border. By the time he addressed the border, it was too late.
Inflation would have hit whoever was President post Covid but the buck stops in the oval office and Harris paid the price.
Given the FACT that you are so stupid as to not even know which years Reagan was in office, you'll hopefully be able to comprehend why NOBODY, literally NOBODY here thinks your "analysis" is worth a warm bucket of hamster vomit.
Infrastructure funding was nothing but pork barrel and payoffs to big donors and bounties to Ukraine. Massive fail. NATO expansion - more Ukraine bullshyte.
Even Dems are wondering where those 15 million votes went
They didn't build a single electric recharger or hook up one person to the internet... Billions spent on those 2 things.
Similar threads
