ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Even if that's true, which there might be even a moderate amount of truth to, I cannot remember an election in my lifetime of two worst candidates. So, let's say Democrats did lead to the nomination of Trump, I see no way that either candidate is actually "good" for America.
Funny that you didn't call Biden the worst candidate until he shit the bed in the debate.
 
Can somebody please explain to these retards that congress has forever and a day had a similar immunity as a president, but not as broad. One thing that probably would not fall under congressional immunity is a senator having secret presidential documents in his garage for anybody to see. Treason has to be proven to take away immunity. Do they want to open that door?
 
Last edited:
Democrats wanted trump as the candidate. There's no avoiding this reality. They played the odds with their friends in the press to elevate him as the nominee, hoping they could then jail their political opponent bc They've been trying to cover their guy is a vegetable.
I like you brassow but I still don't get why people think the Democrats want to face Trump. There's no evidence of that. Hell libs just over the past 24 hours have been having wet dreams about assassinating the guy with a drone.
 
He literally had to get pardoned by the president of the United States so he wouldn't be...


I am not overly familiar with Nixon's troubles -

BUT - I get the sense that those events and relative crimes would seem like Boy Scout activities compared to more modern political crimes and depravities

Maybe I'm off though

I feel the EXACT same way about UK's basketball probation in the 80s for PIDDLY AND TRIFLIN' SHIT

decades later UNC making up fake classes - mundane academic fraud


So - those things are aligned in my head
 
No, that's not what you said. You listed two presidents in modern times who were criminals. Your assertion was false. You're as weak in your defense as you are disingenuous. Next time stick to the facts instead of trying to spread lies.
By your metric none of them are, so are you going to never mention any Biden corruption ever again because he hasn't been convicted of it?
 
I am not overly familiar with Nixon's troubles -

BUT - I get the sense that those events and relative crimes would seem like Boy Scout activities compared to more modern political crimes and depravities

Maybe I'm off though

I feel the EXACT same way about UK's basketball probation in the 80s for PIDDLY AND TRIFLIN' SHIT

decades later UNC making up fake classes - mundane academic fraud


So - those things are aligned in my head
I don't necessarily disagree, but things are viewed in the context of their time. You think any of Trump's 2020ish shenanigans would've flown in the '70s?
 
By your metric none of them are, so are you going to never mention any Biden corruption ever again because he hasn't been convicted of it?
Don't try to turn this around on me. YOU'RE the one who made the claim that there were only two criminals. You have to substantiate your own claims. Answering a question with a question is a logical fallacy and a demonstration of bad faith.

Answer the question.
 
I like you brassow but I still don't get why people think the Democrats want to face Trump. There's no evidence of that. Hell libs just over the past 24 hours have been having wet dreams about assassinating the guy with a drone.
Yes there is...a lot if it. Just bc you can't see anything but love for trump doesn't mean it isn't true. The country isn't just Trump's base.

In 2016. The dnc leaks showed they wanted the press to push him bc they thought it was the best odds for Hillary.

In the midterms they screamed threat to democracy while funneling millions of dark money to the Trump candidate in the primary. It worked for them then.

All polling has shown time and time again for the past two years that other Republicans would easily beat biden. Dont believe polling? Who cares, democrats believed it. Were the Trump first ppl just going go stay home? In fact the only reason they shoved biden out here again is bc he was able to beat Trump before, they wanted to play the odds...unless you don't believe the open secret that there's no way biden, even before this debate, has a chance of finishing a 2nd term. They all know he wasn't...they were jist trying to drag him across the finish line. They never believed any of this cases against trump...prior it was to fire his base up in primaries later it was to sway independents that they could call him a felon.

Independents and dissatisfied party voters were to win this election. Not bases. Elections are won by appealing to wide and diverse blocs, building coalitions, not "firing up the base" .That of course, is all out the window now.

This isn't secret knowledge. Go all the way back to 2016...you'll see hilarious articles after any R had a good week, like "you may think trump is bad, but John Kasich will bring hell on earth" etc.

It's right here, why would they do this:


The receipts exist, theyre real, it's a fact
 
No one at the White House apparently has the sense to tell them none of these explanations of why Biden was barely better than a corpse at the debate are helping...you f-cking idiots.







Never mind the fact that Biden ALSO prepped behind closed doors for a week and STILL crashed and burned...AND that Trump didn't really prepare at all but instead was out campaigning constantly, the very thing Biden tried to use as an excuse for his own monumental failure.
 
You know what, you’re right, man. Joe Biden can totally murder Donald Trump to stop him from running for president and face no consequences whatsoever. He can order FBI agents to issue a warrant less raid on Alito and use as much force as they want. All within his indisputable official duties as president.

Carry on.
iu
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT