It’s unbelievable, apparently the “ second crime” that makes this entire case possible is whatever the jury thinks it is, and they don’t even have to agree on the second crime.Liar and thief Cohen is allowed to "opine" that he thinks he committed a Federal election law violation while the scum judge would not allow an expert to testify for the defense because he would have told the jury that hush money is NOT a Federal election law violiation. Prosecutors are allowed to say "federal election law was vilolated" a million times, knowingly planting a lie in the jurors heads while the judge won't allow the truth to be told.
Democrats are the lowest form of life and its not even close.
Is this where we’re at, the state doesn’t even have to claim a crime, they can put a person on trial and have the jury decide the crime to get a guilty verdict, and the jury doesn’t have to agree on said crime?