I have to say it does amaze me the amount of concern so many poster have over what I think or what I post. Even more amazing is the paranoia on the part of a few like bigblueinsanity, thinking that I'm here to carry out some anti-Republican agenda.
A lot of words for not a lot of substance. Look, the point is, as I have said before, own what you are. There is nothing wrong with that. You toe the party line because you believe in their agenda. I may disagree with you most of the time but, it is never personal. I am a conservative and a Christian and have never hid that but, would vote across part lines if the right candidate came along. That candidate would however have to prove that they were willing to give a good deal to get my support. Obama has not. He has alienated at least half of this country and it started with "We won the election so, deal with it". Not a good way to earn respect across the Isle.Originally posted by Deeeefense:
I have to say it does amaze me the amount of concern so many poster have over what I think or what I post. Even more amazing is the paranoia on the part of a few like bigblueinsanity, thinking that I'm here to carry out some anti-Republican agenda.
Hey it's just a discussion board folks nothing more, nothing less. I say what happens to pop into my mind like most everyone else, and my opinion is no more or less important than the next person's. I doubt anyone on this board is ever going to have their mind changed over anything I post or vice verse but hopefully by typing what I think, and reading what others say, it might cause us to pause and think a little bit from time to time.
Yes I expressed frustration over the parties inability to work together in congress a view that most Americans share but that doesn't mean I can't blast the 47 morons in the Senate that sent that letter to Iran or the Chipmunk for hiding her email. If criticizing members of one, or both parties is a sin in your eyes, that I have news for you - everybody that posts here regularly is in trouble
Seriously some folks need to quit worrying so much, and stop throwing stones in a glass house.
So would I in fact I did by voting for Bob Corker for Senate in 2012, so what's your problem?
Nice job of cherry picking. Nothing Deee says will convince me he voted for a Republican for president. I stand by that statement in its full context.
uh, you left out also volunteering for those O campaigns.
Lie, dodge, and deflect Its the Clinton way. She clearly thinks she adheres to her own set of rules. Her and Bill have always been an elitist bunch of entitled politicians (like many of Washington). They could care less about you and I. All they care about is money and power.
Honestly after 8 years of what was in my opinion the worst president of my lifetime, I could not vote for any Pub in 2008. Obama was a fresh face with fresh ideas, a smart well educated and well spoken guy, though lacking in experience. He was not the perfect candidate but better than the aging McCain, and when he put a functional illiterate on the ballot with him, it was game over. There was no legitimate 3rd party candidate in 08 or 12. Sorry but I can't describe my decision making process between two candidates without mentioning both.
Willy - not sure why you think that's funny. For example Jeb has good poll numbers in Florida and has a decent favorable rating. What that tells me is the people that lived under his office for the time he was governor generally approve of the job he did. That to me means a lot more than rhetoric and promises.
Had you read my post on emailgate you would know that's not true.
The reason it's funny is because most of America are morons. Like 80%. We're in this pickle because too many people rely on someone else's opinion, which is EXACTLY does not need to happen. That's why we are in the shape we are in. The crowd followers. Weak and powerless.
Pretty much I'd say. We're soon to be in 2016 and our election is going to end up looking like 1992 all over again. I'd say we are regressing as a country. 330 million Americans and the we're gonna pick from the same two names from 23 years ago?Originally posted by Deeeefense:
The I guess we're all screwed
LOL. He voted for Obama TWICE. And worked on his campaign.
I'm not trying to prove that point, rather that, if you're first, and overwhelming, reaction to the moronic and inaccurate letter sent o the governing Iranian regime is "the other side did stupid stuff first" then you are truly kawtowing to your party, and thus hindering constructive discourse over the matter by further lowering the bar, if that bar still exists.
not really becasue whatever I said you would disagree with. Any way it's just a subjective opinion based on what I've seen of him.
It is technically inaccurate. The exact wording of the letter was: "A so-called congressional-executive agreement requires a majority vote in both the House and the Senate… Anything not approved by Congress is a mere executive agreement."
You're right decades of racial profiling and police misconduct towards minorities had nothing to do with this. It's just all about Michael Brown.I thought you were smarter than that.
That may be true but I still think "not wanting to carry two phones around" is a lame excuse.
*Well, she's seen it work twice for obummer.Originally posted by BernieSadori:
"Didn't want to carry around two phones."
*Wow, she really is counting on the stupidity of the American people to help her along.
If mean, if only there was the technology that allowed multiple e-mail accounts on ONE phone! Could you imagine!
Plus, she always has an entourage surrounding her. She couldn't make one of her minions hold her other phone?
And no Deeeeefeeeeenseeee.....as one of the highest ranking officials in the US you don't wait to do your serious e-mail's when you can get to a laptop or desktop. You answer an important question immediately.
*Worst case, she goes to the restroom and types one up while she's standing at the urinal.
