You bet your ass he found a way to get UL closer to the spread.
You will NEVER convince me that he is not on the take.
You will NEVER convince me that he is not on the take.
Pat Adams is on the take……
- Thread starter St.PatterSoN-54-
- Start date
That’s the thing about the refs. There’s no accountability whatsoever. There are referees that are unapologetically biased. But there’s no one the coaches can go to to point it out. And the refs will gladly make the game worse for them if they ever feel like their authority is being questioned.
Because he knows he will face no punishment from those in charge because they approve. That’s how he can be so blatant, sadly.
Ever since he called that bullshit technical on Isaac Humphrey sp? at A&M costing us a victory and a 3 seed I've hated him and noticed how terrible he is.
Guys and Gals, sorry to break it to you but, any sport that has organized gambling involved is 💯 rigged when need be!
You’d have to be a brainless idiot not to understand this! Just stop playing dumb ✅
You’d have to be a brainless idiot not to understand this! Just stop playing dumb ✅
Every time UK reached the 10 point spread, UofL mysteriously went on a run.
He seemed ticked off he had to review the play where he wanted to change the player the foul was called on. They put the camera on him at the review table and he looked mad as hell. Made me laugh.
no doubt
he did everything he could do to keep ul in the game
it is sad when your cheating is so bad that your crew has to go to the monitor to prevent you from cheating
Too bad for Pat Adams, that people like me, who don’t bet, came out in top. My team won. F Pat Adams
Adams is the absolute worst. Say what you want about Doug Shows. He’s large and in charge and makes everything about him and he doesn’t gaf if you like his way of trying to make things fair and objective, at least his idea of fair and objective.
Pat Adams is vicious, vengeful, and holds grudges. He wants to make everything about him and he doesn’t gaf about fair and objective, period.
Pat Adams is vicious, vengeful, and holds grudges. He wants to make everything about him and he doesn’t gaf about fair and objective, period.
I was just getting ready to ask the question, When it is so obvious, so blatant, why can't something be done? I mean the proof would be there if he were called out, so why isn't he? I know, I know, there is no one to hold them accountable. Do what can be done to get that changed? Where do we start? I'm ready. Especially when the jerk is so obvious, so smug about it.
Adams has always been bad news for us. Like a crook yesterday. So obvious on some of those calls. If we get him for anymore games need to boo him out of the stadium whether it is a good or bad call. Make it obvious to him the BBN knows he is rogue.
I've rewatched the game 3 times. On most calls, Adams was never in the position to make the call. There was always another ref at the play and Adams was on the backside across the court.
The play that really irked me was when he called the shot over the backboard. The actual ref under the basket didn't call it, but the guy out near halfcourt and on the opposite side saw it better. I don't care if he might have gotten it right, but there's no way he saw it from his vantage point.
That was a blatantly bad vantage point, you're right.The play that really irked me was when he called the shot over the backboard. The actual ref under the basket didn't call it, but the guy out near halfcourt and on the opposite side saw it better. I don't care if he might have gotten it right, but there's no way he saw it from his vantage point.
But the winner, as stated before, was him intentionally trying to change the 5th foul call to keep the UL player in the game. He was REALLY Salty that the other refs made him go to the review to correct his inappropriately overturned call.
How did you all feel when the refs let us have that do-over on the inbounds play? How would you have felt if you were a Louisville fan and they were trying to make a comeback late.
Adams was shit all day, BUT did you not see garrison push the Louisville players head down on to the court ? He could have been hit with a "T" for it. Watch the replay, he shoves the guys head. I was screaming all game at Adams, but we got by with one on the Garrison play.
If he bet the under, he lost his ass. 187 total points scored, wayyyyy over the posted total for the game. Am I missing something with your post ?
I've watched a lot of basketball in my time and seen plenty of individual bad calls. I honestly believe today was the worst collection of bad calls I have ever seen. His poor/missed calls spanned the entire game. It was the most obvious attempt to influence a game I have ever seen. If the game had come down to a one possession situation we would have had no chance(I mean 0 chance) to win.
Remember, they’re “getting paid” to not win or lose games, but to beat the spread
For those of us that do not gamble we would just prefer a fair game instead of going against the team and Pat Adams actively trying to change the outcome
Yes, I’m sure that one fake inbound play that none of us actually saw made up for all the non-Call walks and hacking and pulling. You seem to have an agenda today basically just being contrary is there a reason for it?
This single event was the one that should have the NCAA looking into this clown. I've never seen a ref run in from a bad position and try to force the other ref to change who the foul was on. Especially since it was 100% obvious to anyone with functioning eyes that the hack was by the guy with 4 fouls.
It was so obvious to me that Pat was steering the game - he wanted to save one of their two best players to manage the spread. He called an over-the-backboard shot from midcourt opposite of the shot itself (which was not over the backboard). He overruled a ref TWICE on an out of bounds call - one time very, very aggressively and again from the completely opposite side of the action.
However, I noticed after this one event Pat Adams changed his entire scheme for the rest of the game (which wasn't much). This, to me, was because he knew he burned his last chance to not look so obvious. Anything more would have been fire alarm red alerts that he was in fact managing the spread to his liking.
Last edited:
I have a buddy who says he knows several people that act as private "proxies" for illegal sports gambling. I asked "refs, players, or coaches?" and he said "uh-huh....".
In other words, you or I could bet on games online and Pat Adams would slip me $1000 cash in an envelope in my mailbox. If the spread is beaten, I collect the winnings, then go pull cash out a month later and slip it back to Pat. It's just me betting, not Pat, and there's no link to Pat whatsoever to that gambling because I'm just some dude with no link to the sport itself.
Last edited:
And the out of bounds where one guy called it UK's ball but Pat flew in from midcourt and aggressively threw his arm in the direction of UL, shaking his fat head and pursing his lips like "he da boss".
I think he meant he bet UL would beat the spread. Just got his terminology wrong because he's likely not a gambler.
If we get to send him somewhere, I vote for North Dakota, not Florida or Belize.
