ADVERTISEMENT

Pat Adams history

willievic

Senior
Aug 29, 2005
6,154
7,020
113
85
Louisville, KY.
Take the time to look at Pat Adams history as a ref. He has made several calls in the last few seconds that decided the outcome of the game. I put in the search: Pat Adams, college basketball ref in the SEC.

OLD STOLL FIELD GUY!
 
Adams needs to be destroyed in the media but Cal can't be the one doing it. It's more than just a fine he would be encouraging retribution. You would just end up with another Sermins situation . I still believe Cal was ejected in the South Carolina game because of what happened in the previous game. Blast an egomaniac like Adams Cal would just get a repeat of that.
 
It was a good call , people do t like the timing but I've witnessed that call many times in the past . Just last week Briscoe slammed the ball and a usc player got T'd for knocking the ball out of Briscoes hands after the play . Just a dumb play , the should be an learning experience .
 
It was a good call , people do t like the timing but I've witnessed that call many times in the past . Just last week Briscoe slammed the ball and a usc player got T'd for knocking the ball out of Briscoes hands after the play . Just a dumb play , the should be an learning experience .
Um, those were 2 totally different situations. Last week didn't cost USC jr. the game. And as much as i hate Duke, the 5th foul on Grayson Allen today was a terrible call. But it was kind of like karma.
 
Um, those were 2 totally different situations. Last week didn't cost USC jr. the game. And as much as u hate Duke, the 5th foul on Grayson Allen today was a terrible call. But it was kind of like karma.
It's delay of game and unsportsmanlike , the timing of the play doesn't matter . They should call it at any point in the game , this is Humphries fault . If a UL player did the same thing against us there would be an uproar , it's terrible that many are being disingenuous about it .
 
  • Like
Reactions: OHIO COLONEL
It's delay of game and unsportsmanlike , the timing of the play doesn't matter . They should call it at any point in the game , this is Humphries fault . If a UL player did the same thing against us there would be an uproar , it's terrible that many are being disingenuous about it .

Honestly, if the situation was reversed, I would just be annoyed at the player, but I would never expect that technical to be called and I would call it BS even if it benefitted UK. The technical against SC was garbage, too.
 
Honestly, if the situation was reversed, I would just be annoyed at the player, but I would never expect that technical to be called and I would call it BS even if it benefitted UK. The technical against SC was garbage, too.
So that play doesn't bother you but it's called a T all the time and it's common knowledge . It's weird to see everyone act like it's not a T .
 
It's delay of game and unsportsmanlike , the timing of the play doesn't matter . They should call it at any point in the game , this is Humphries fault . If a UL player did the same thing against us there would be an uproar , it's terrible that many are being disingenuous about it .
No, it's not delay of game. It was a dead ball. And who was he being "Unsportsmanlike" to? He wasn't taunting anyone.
 
I wish the man would lose his job. He's a poor pathetic excuse of an official and man. He wants the show to be about him and he did just that. He absolutely robbed us. Again I wish he would lose his job over this. He doesn't deserve to officiate any game not even middle school. But the reality is nothing will happen because they are untouchable.
 
It's delay of game and unsportsmanlike , the timing of the play doesn't matter . They should call it at any point in the game , this is Humphries fault . If a UL player did the same thing against us there would be an uproar , it's terrible that many are being disingenuous about it .

If we won on a call like that, I would feel like we stole something. Not disingenuous in the least.
 
Honestly, if the situation was reversed, I would just be annoyed at the player, but I would never expect that technical to be called and I would call it BS even if it benefitted UK. The technical against SC was garbage, too.
No it wasn't. He'd done that once already. That's probably why he got called for it. Plus, like already mentioned. Apples to oranges. We're talking about a Tech that was issued with :09 remaining in which we had a 70% FT shooter headed to the line to put us up by 3 points.
 
It was a good call , people do t like the timing but I've witnessed that call many times in the past . Just last week Briscoe slammed the ball and a usc player got T'd for knocking the ball out of Briscoes hands after the play . Just a dumb play , the should be an learning experience .
WRONG. The clock was stopped. It was essentially an expression of triumph by a young college player after the play was over. The rules do not require that a T be called for slamming the ball down on the floor. Given the score and time remaining, most officials would not have call that a T for the reasons I stated and since it would dramatically change the outcome. The players should determine the outcome of the game by their play while the clock is moving. As I stated in another thread there are some who have an agenda of knocking Kentucky down so that other teams can share the glory.
 
I wish the man would lose his job. He's a poor pathetic excuse of an official and man. He wants the show to be about him and he did just that. He absolutely robbed us. Again I wish he would lose his job over this. He doesn't deserve to officiate any game not even middle school. But the reality is nothing will happen because they are untouchable.
He'll be officiating next month. Book it. He always does.
 
If we won on a call like that, I would feel like we stole something. Not disingenuous in the least.
It doesn't matter about timing , a foul in the first minute should be a foul in the last minute . It was a dumb play by Humpries , everybody acting like it's all the refs fault is the epitome of disingenuous . We all know that's been called before , I don't know why everyone is shocked by it .
 
In frustration, yes. Not for a game saving/winning play. There's a difference. If you're frustrated with a call and you slam the ball down, then you're essentially taunting the ref. In this particular instance, he was celebrating a play. HUGE difference.
Excessive celebration ?
 
WRONG. The clock was stopped. It was essentially an expression of triumph by a young college player after the play was over. The rules do not require that a T be called for slamming the ball down on the floor. Given the score and time remaining, most officials would not have call that a T for the reasons I stated and since it would dramatically change the outcome. The players should determine the outcome of the game by their play while the clock is moving. As I stated in another thread there are some who have an agenda of knocking Kentucky down so that other teams can share the glory.
RIGHT , it's the refs discretion and a justified one . Bad play by our player , learn and move on .
 
It was a good call , people do t like the timing but I've witnessed that call many times in the past . Just last week Briscoe slammed the ball and a usc player got T'd for knocking the ball out of Briscoes hands after the play . Just a dumb play , the should be an learning experience .
except, from what I understand, they didn't T Briscoe up for slamming the ball - he actually got the technical for "excessive celebrating" with Murray a few seconds later.
 
It doesn't matter about timing , a foul in the first minute should be a foul in the last minute . It was a dumb play by Humpries , everybody acting like it's all the refs fault is the epitome of disingenuous . We all know that's been called before , I don't know why everyone is shocked by it .

It wasn't a smart play by Humphries. The ref also was under no obligation to call it a T.

A ref calling a T that he doesn't have to call, knowing that it will likely decide the game, that's the epitome of what's wrong with college basketball.

Sorry you disagree, but whatever.
 
I personally think it was a bad call because of the timing of it. It wasn't an over the top celebration and I have seen people celebrate more than what he did and it not get called. I think Pat Adams is a terrible ref for more than what he did tonight.
THIS!!!! :09 remaining. That is the most important factor at play. Call it midway through the 1st half or 2nd half and it's probably still a ticky tack call, but it's easy to overcome. With :09 remaining, it reveals an agenda. Plus, it's not like Humphries punted the ball up in the stands or taunted another player. Hell, if the ball comes back up and he catches it, it might not even get called.
 
Just fyi who remembers back in 92 iirc when we aggravated Shaq so much on defense he slammed the ball down and did get a T for it. Of course the ball probably went halfway to the roof. Here we go remembering plays over 2 decades ago [winking]
 
That's subjective, and officials shouldn't be making those types of judgment calls with :09 remaining! It's often why they don't call the most obvious fouls on the last play of the game. They don't want to be responsible for impacting the outcome. I guess Pat Adams is the exception and not the norm.
When it happened I was annoyed at Humpries , I knew it was a a bad move . Many thousands of times players have gotten a crucial rebound and not excessively celebrated , it's his fault for not doing that . It's not ok to do it just because it's late in the game and it never has been . I am surprised by the reaction on this play by our fans , we got a crappy whistle at usc and that's a justified complaint . This however seems like an accumulated reaction to calls over the season , like at Kansas where again we got a crappy whistle . This play was on us , the ref made a legitimate call . It wasn't like he called a phantom T on Hump , he slammed the ball . I don't know why slamming the ball has become something that should be overlooked when it's been called for decades .
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT