ADVERTISEMENT

Over/Under for 23/24 Season Win Total

If you had to choose over or under 17 wins, what are taking?

  • Over

    Votes: 73 60.3%
  • Under

    Votes: 48 39.7%

  • Total voters
    121
I don’t appreciate your tone or how you talk to me (and others). Just bc you are hiding behind a keyboard doesn’t make it appropriate to throw around ad hominem attacks - especially those of us who actually graduated from the school and have the only opinions that actually matter.
What an elitist load of bull. So your "opinions" matter more than the hard working people of the Commonwealth that are 2nd, and some 3rd generation UK fans? That for whatever reason didn't attend UK?

Yeah....fans like you give BBN a bad name if you truly believe that.
 
What an elitist load of bull. So your "opinions" matter more than the hard working people of the Commonwealth that are 2nd, and some 3rd generation UK fans? That for whatever reason didn't attend UK?

Yeah....fans like you give BBN a bad name if you truly believe that.
he is not a fan just a useless troll
 
he is not a fan just a useless troll
I just hate that attitude. I've met some very arrogant UK folks that did attend UK and think solely because they did, they are the only ones that can comment on anything with UK (even though, lol, it's publicly funded)

It's such a gatekeeping mentality and is part of the reason other fan bases say we "run people off" (which we don't, but that elitist crap doesn't help)
 
  • Like
Reactions: thedahc
I thought from the title the O/U was being set at 23-24 (so 23.5) wins. And I thought that is about right.
I don't think we are done, with 1-2 more additions coming. Now who knows if they will be impactful additions or not. The last 2 have not been, but could be in 2-3 years (if they stay).

But this team has a lot of similarities to 2014 and 2018. Those 2 teams both entered the NCAA-T at 24-10.
Yes, the 14 team had WCS and Poythress, plus Randle was physically ready. But 18 really didn't have better returnees, nor a better incoming class. 2018 might be the best comparison to this team (unless we do add significant piece(s) soon).

Gabriel & SKJ may have played more as FR, but honestly I think Onyenso and Theiro are a slightly better pair.
I think Edwards will be better than Knox.
And think Wagner may be as good as SGA was.
Dillingham & Diallo may be pretty equal.
Can Bradshaw be the impact PJ (FR) was? Maybe, but this is one I'm skeptical of.
Can Sheppard match Green? Probably not.
Can we add 1-2 guys who can impact as much as Richards and Vanderbilt (only 14 games) did? IDK!
 
Last edited:
I don’t appreciate your tone or how you talk to me (and others). Just bc you are hiding behind a keyboard doesn’t make it appropriate to throw around ad hominem attacks - especially those of us who actually graduated from the school and have the only opinions that actually matter.
*Bred
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Blue Bigfoot

1qhhlj.jpg
 
If Bradshaw is truly not hurt and is ready to go in October and we, somehow address the glaring weaknesses we have, then I think we have a 20+ win season. If not, we barely break .500.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UK_Born_an_Bread
Way under

This team is headed for a 13-19 type season
Don't feel bad because @Sejonesy clicked the laughing emoji on your post. He also would have been the guy who thought a 9-16 season in 2021 and a first round loss to St. Peter's in 2022 would have been unfathomable; and thereby would have clicked the laughing emoji if anyone had suggested anything close to that back then.

That is to say, he has no real credibility on this message board. He doesn't think sheer incompetence is possible with Calipari, and that's where he logically goes off the rails on an annual, if not weekly, basis.
 
I’m thinking this team, as of 6/20, ends up 18 - 14. Hopefully we aren’t finished adding guys to the roster, so we’ll see how that goes.
 
Don't feel bad because @Sejonesy clicked the laughing emoji on your post. He also would have been the guy who thought a 9-16 season in 2021 and a first round loss to St. Peter's in 2022 would have been unfathomable; and thereby would have clicked the laughing emoji if anyone had suggested anything close to that back then.

That is to say, he has no real credibility on this message board. He doesn't think sheer incompetence is possible with Calipari, and that's where he logically goes off the rails on an annual, if not weekly, basis.
Weird dude you are for sure
 
This post shows the stupidity of this forum and what’s come of it. Predicted under 17 wins is absolutely ridiculous. Could it happen, sure. The odds of it happening though are very low. Doom and gloom everywhere, it’s pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mebeblue2
-21 regular season wins
-1 SECT win
-1 NCAAT win
-4 players drafted = successful season in Cal's eyes.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT