his contract was on a napkin: there wasn’t even a contract it was a memorandum of understanding. Barney didn’t have to do much to move Bcg on. The fact that Barney didn’t even execute a proper business transaction shoulda got him fired.
and the other sports I think regardless of the AD the rifle team and cheer squad and others were going to do well. Swim wins an sec title volleyball a natty. The same season basketball wins 9 games and football below .500.
I see this argument against Barnhart all the time...all these other sports would've eventually done well. Not sure how anyone could think that given the entire history of UK sports.
Again, as i said when this topic was first posted, UK athletics was known for 3 things...Men's basketball, losing streaks in football and letting Bear Bryant go. Other than that, for the vast majority of its existence UK athletics has not been all that good.
- You mention rifle specifically. In the existence of the rifle team, they had won exactly zero championships and been in the final match twice (only saw 1980-present for the runner-up). Since he's been here, we've been in the final match 7 times, winning 3 NCs in those 7.
- As for women's volleyball you think we'd have won a NC regardless. No team in the entire SEC had won one.
- Women's basketball (back to 1968) had a team ranked at seasons' end 4 times before Barnhart. Since, 10 times with 4 of those being top 10s. Before Mitch, 1 season of 25+ wins, since 7.
- Almost all other sports are better (many much better) than when he arrived.
In the entirety of UK athletics we've won 13 (NCAA sanctioned) championships (8 MBB, 3 Rifle, 1 WVB and 1 CC). 5 of them, in 3 different sports, have been under Barnhart. Crap, 2 of the 3 ADs before him were fired for troubles with the NCAA. The Ath Dept has been pretty much spotless since he's been here. In all honesty, with the history of UK and the reputation of Cal pre-UK, how many thought we wouldn't see ANYTHING, not even minor stuff, come to light?
The 2 biggest mistakes he's made were BCG and Joker (maybe the checkerboard is in there depending on who you ask). Both he rectified with 3 years (2 and 3, respectively) and turned those into arguably the best runs of either sport with their successors.
No one can argue (who am i kidding some here will argue about anything, this topic included) the facilities have been drastically improved, as well.
I just don't know how anyone can look at the overall picture (coaches, players, results, facilities, integrity/staying out of trouble, etc) of UK athletics and not think we are in a much better spot since MB arrived. Whether you think it would've happened regardless or not, he's still the guy in charge while it's happening.
EDIT: Figured i'd add in some more support regarding baseball (yes, baseball) and softball.
Softball just started in 1997. After settling in with Rachel Lawson in 2008, we've been to the NCAAT the last 12 years (not including the covid year) and been to the super regional 8 of the last 9 years and a WCWS in 2014. And, it looked like they may have been heading towards their best season ever (20-4/2-1) when covid ended the 2020 season.
Has baseball been all that great? I'll admit, no. But, having said that, the baseball team has seen post season play 7 times since 1903 (not sure when postseason play began) and 5 of them have been under Barnhart. If there is one thing that could be used against him is the current coaching situation, though. For now, i'll give him the benefit of the doubt given Mingione was SEC coach of the year in 2017. Now, 2019 clearly was NOT a good year, but then covid undercut the 2020 season and last year at 29-23, they at least showed a slight improvement (i will admit, not hard to do given 2019). I could see one more, MAYBE 2 more, year(s), to right the ship.