Unless this is just Kentucky-kid-bias, with respect it's just not a very good take. If you think Kerr is bad on defense, Travis is much much worse. If you think Kerr turns it over vs pressure, Travis hasn't even seen pressure like Clemson/Duke before in his life.I’d play Perry over him right now - Krissa shooting 25% from both 2& 3 Guarantee you Perry can do better with the minutes Krissa gets
As far as defense neither would be great
As far as bringing ball up against pressure
We got a 7’ named Magic Williams that does that
Give me Perry much better scorer
Here's the big issue I've noticed posters missing on: everyone wants to mention "not contributing" or his shooting %. He is playing as a point guard, not as a shooting guard. So when Butler gets a rest, or like in the Clemson game when he rolls an ankle, Kerr is literally our only other option at PG. You can argue that he isn't playing up to expectations, and Kerr would agree with you.
"Give me Perry, much better scorer" just isn't the right take, again with respect.