About What? Lol. Let's all get a peek at your crystal ball.
The game has more parity than ever now, and will continue to have more going forward. No longer does Alabama get to dominate every year. There will be more Indianas in the playoff than imagined in a million years. It's a new world and a better world,
It's the same world, no matter how hysterical and fanatical you get about it. Check out a thing called history. There was parity in the early days of college football. There is some semblance of parity now. Enjoy it while it lasts.
and you and old Grumpy Georgia may disagree but whatever.
Lol. Grumpy doesn't agree with me, nor read my posts. He blocked me for disagreeing with him over a year ago.
It's better now and the ratings show it. UK sucks now, but it's not because of anything other than, we now suck.
Having a bad year doesn't mean "UK sucks now," chicken little. It's absolutely hilarious that people can claim how great Indiana is now based off of one season, but can't use the same reasoning to see that we've taken a step back ALSO for one season.
With the same lack of logic, money has brought parity to everyone, except it has nothing to do with UK. You're not making any sense.
UK keeps its best players, hasn’t lost much of anyone, gets 5 star portal players, and sucks anyway. Whose fault is that, certainly not the new system.
How many "5 star portal players" did UK get? This should be some fantastical writing.... can't wait
Who have we lost to Texas or Alabama? The only good players we lost are to midmajors when we stupidly let them go. Like, Chris Lewis. John Young.
Wait for it. Wait for it....
Name one big name stud we've lost to a blueblood. Justin Rodgers? He was good riddance.
Oops. So we did lose a stud or we didnt? Lol.
He WAS a 5 star. Out of high school. Wasn't a 5 star when he left UK was he? Do you understand the difference?
Who else? We suck on our own, Indiana doesn't, Vanderbilt doesn't. More parity than ever now, exactly the opposite of what you posted.
I didn't say "WE lost anyone" to Texas or Alabama. I didn't say there doesn't seem to be parity right now.
You're missing the points completely, but you have to look further ahead than what's in front of your nose.
What is the end result of big money bidding for the best talent?
"I'm sure everything will be just fine."
"Money is involved but there will be parity anyway."
"There's no way this can get out of hand, because the NCAA has it all under control."
How did Indiana get to 10 wins? Was it by taking mediocre talent and building it up? Or was it by getting great talent and using it properly? How did they get the talent they do have? Does it have ANYTHING to do with their schedule?
-Are we jumping the gun on "parity" simply because the SEC has done what was expected in this first year of new scheduling?
-Did the SEC shoot itself squarely in the foot eliminating divisions and fkn with the schedule so dramatically? (As I thought it had when this cluster was first announced)
Indiana has money behind it. If they haven't used it yet, they will. They have a lot more money to draw from than UK, which is the exact OPPOSITE of PARITY. We shouldn't confuse temporary change with parity