If equity and parity are the goal of the NCAA seeding process, then how should the #1 and #2 seeds be given this year ... not withstanding how the conference tournaments play out?
# 1 - Kentucky
#1 - Virginia
# 1 - Villanova
# 1 - Duke (depending on UNC game and ACC tournament)
# 2 - Arizona
# 2 - Wisconsin
# 2 - Gonzaga
# 2 - Kansas
The pairings:
* Kentucky and either Kansas or Gonzaga
* Virginia and either Kansas or Gonzaga
* Villanova and Wisconsin
* Duke and Arizona
IMO, no way should UK be paired with Wisconsin or Arizona or Duke or Nova or Virginia ... if based on parity, should be Kansas or Gonzaga.
# 1 - Kentucky
#1 - Virginia
# 1 - Villanova
# 1 - Duke (depending on UNC game and ACC tournament)
# 2 - Arizona
# 2 - Wisconsin
# 2 - Gonzaga
# 2 - Kansas
The pairings:
* Kentucky and either Kansas or Gonzaga
* Virginia and either Kansas or Gonzaga
* Villanova and Wisconsin
* Duke and Arizona
IMO, no way should UK be paired with Wisconsin or Arizona or Duke or Nova or Virginia ... if based on parity, should be Kansas or Gonzaga.
