ADVERTISEMENT

Massacre on Bourbon St, 10 dead 30 injured

PTI, in classic fashion, has a biting point in spite of his snark.

If the maniac had purple hair, a segment of this country would point and go, "yet another unreported/under reported liberal maniac murdering innocent people again."

Same for if it was a deranged early 20s white guy with a manifesto riddled with grammatical errors.

Its political theater to most people for some reason and that is depressing as hell. This person clearly had a motive but a flag and the claims of some barely existing terrorist organization is hardly proof of anything.

Its natural to want to know more about why someone would want to do something we all find so deranged and bizarre, it's just unfortunate that everything is through the purview of politics now.

We barely had the guys name reported and already knew who he donated to, his voter registration and a ton of other details that likely had nothing to do with the decision to callously kill dozens of people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDHoss
Yes, but that was Fox News. They were the only ones who reported that. So you should've known it was bull shit. Can we all agree, everything that's on Fox news is probably a lie and should only be repeated if you see it confirmed by a reputable source. In fact, just stop watching. It's nice to have your ideas supported, but you're only lying to yourself.
There have actually been studies on this. People who regularly watch Fox News are less informed than people who consume no news at all.
 
The guy lived down the street from a mosque in a trailer park with other Muslims. Yet I read in the WSJ that he worked for Deloitte and at some point made at least 125k a year. Wasn’t this the plot of Homeland or some other show? Normal American Muslim falls on hard times and becomes a radical terrorist?
 
We barely had the guys name reported and already knew who he donated to, his voter registration and a ton of other details that likely had nothing to do with the decision to callously kill dozens of people.


We knew all that before his name was reported.
 
Its political theater to most people for some reason and that is depressing as hell. This person clearly had a motive but a flag and the claims of some barely existing terrorist organization is hardly proof of anything.
Yeah. I mean it is probably a total coincidence that he had an ISIS flag in his truck while committing an act of random violence.

Let's not rule out that he might have just really hated beignets!
 
PTI, in classic fashion, has a biting point in spite of his snark.

If the maniac had purple hair, a segment of this country would point and go, "yet another unreported/under reported liberal maniac murdering innocent people again."

Same for if it was a deranged early 20s white guy with a manifesto riddled with grammatical errors.

Its political theater to most people for some reason and that is depressing as hell. This person clearly had a motive but a flag and the claims of some barely existing terrorist organization is hardly proof of anything.

Its natural to want to know more about why someone would want to do something we all find so deranged and bizarre, it's just unfortunate that everything is through the purview of politics now.

We barely had the guys name reported and already knew who he donated to, his voter registration and a ton of other details that likely had nothing to do with the decision to callously kill dozens of people.
MSM was slow to report the ISIS flag on the back of the truck. If it was a Trump flag, they would have ran with it within seconds.
 
I’d love to see a link(s) documenting this.
I'm guessing whatever I provide will just be laughed at as "leftist propaganda", but here you go.


"To test this argument, we used data on actual TV viewership to recruit a sample of regular Fox News viewers and incentivized a randomized treatment group to watch CNN instead for a month. Contrary to predictions from motivated reasoning, watching CNN caused substantial learning and moderated participants’ attitudes in covered domains."


"The conclusion: Sunday morning news shows do the most to help people learn about current events, while some outlets, especially Fox News, lead people to be even less informed than those who say they don’t watch any news at all."
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Caveman Catfan
I'm getting dizzy from all this spin.

"Well the Isis flag was upside down, so we clearly can't say if he knew he was actually flying the right flag".
 
MSM was slow to report the ISIS flag on the back of the truck. If it was a Trump flag, they would have ran with it within seconds.
So you watched 20+ news outlets at once? Saw an unconfirmed report before 11:00am and by 6:30 pm t was mentioned as fact.

Can’t speak for PTI, but I think this is exactly what he’s hinting at: tribalism. My team vs your team and all the assumptions, truthfully or not, associated with either side. And you went straight there with the MSM shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UK-BILL
The woman employed by the FBI, in a position where she’d be speaking for the bureau after a tragedy like this, thought it was very important to immediately proclaim the man who ran over dozens of people with IEDs in his truck while flying an ISIS flag was not committing an act of terror.

So forgive me for resorting to “tribalism” when I’ve been painted as a Nazi by that same bureau, and everyone voting in support of the status quo, simply for having voted for a certain politician.

Same with Covid. You don’t get to act like none of that happened and take the high road now after supporting the corrupt, insane division for the past 8 years.
 
So you watched 20+ news outlets at once? Saw an unconfirmed report before 11:00am and by 6:30 pm t was mentioned as fact.

Can’t speak for PTI, but I think this is exactly what he’s hinting at: tribalism. My team vs your team and all the assumptions, truthfully or not, associated with either side. And you went straight there with the MSM shot.
This isnt a my team vs your team, its common sense. Call it what it is. The FBI agent at first called it an "event" and not a terrorist attack. There was an ISIS flag on the back of the truck. Why was it covered up?

MSM deserves every shot they take. They are the worst.
 
The woman employed by the FBI, in a position where she’d be speaking for the bureau after a tragedy like this, thought it was very important to immediately proclaim the man who ran over dozens of people with IEDs in his truck while flying an ISIS flag was not committing an act of terror.
Their definition might be different than your since it includes: intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of government, affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction.

Did they have enough information at that time to make a determination based on their definition? Or was it just another nut job going off the rails?

It could be FBI SoP to simply prevent panic in an active crime scene that was densely populated by guest/tourist. Or a host of other reasons we wouldn’t even consider because we’ve never been in that position.

It’s never give the benefit of the doubt here any more and every statement that one doesn’t agree with is an attack on my team. Not saying this is where you are, but it's a dangerous place to be.
 
MSM was slow to report the ISIS flag on the back of the truck. If it was a Trump flag, they would have ran with it within seconds.
This isnt a my team vs your team, its common sense. Call it what it is. The FBI agent at first called it an "event" and not a terrorist attack. There was an ISIS flag on the back of the truck. Why was it covered up?

MSM deserves every shot they take. They are the worst.
I would argue terrorists are the worst. When you're taking something that did happen and use it to create a scenario that didn't happen about Donald Trump and one of his flags, you're playing my team vs your team. When you'd rather take shots at the "MSM" for a scenario you created, you're playing my team vs your team. Fact is, an attack occurred and numerous people were killed. Let's stick with what happened and those facts instead of using that to make this about Trump and his merchandise. Not everything in your life should revolve around a politician.
 
I would argue terrorists are the worst. When you're taking something that did happen and use it to create a scenario that didn't happen about Donald Trump and one of his flags, you're playing my team vs your team. When you'd rather take shots at the "MSM" for a scenario you created, you're playing my team vs your team. Fact is, an attack occurred and numerous people were killed. Let's stick with what happened and those facts instead of using that to make this about Trump and his merchandise. Not everything in your life should revolve around a politician.
Got anymore polling data to share?
 
I can see it.

The Tesla thing is something else. Dude was a 36 year old sergeant major on active duty in the Green Berets. That's as close to real-life Rambo as it gets.

It would appear that (if it is a suicide bombing as it appears) he purposefully did it so no one would be hurt. The Sheriff out there said that the Tesla truck design created a shell that directed force upwards. He didn't use high explosive or shrapnel. Presumably this guy is capable of ultra violence at scale with his training and is highly intelligent or he wouldn't be in that rank.

Would have to be entirely symbolic if everything is as it seems. That does not seem to be the same motivation as the NOLA guy -- which was carnage.

Also, I will bet that it turns out NOLA was a lone wolf who was radicalized online. I doubt anyone provided any intentional aid to him. A truck attack is basically straight out of the ISIS manual.
 
Their definition might be different than your since it includes: intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of government, affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction.

Did they have enough information at that time to make a determination based on their definition? Or was it just another nut job going off the rails?

It could be FBI SoP to simply prevent panic in an active crime scene that was densely populated by guest/tourist. Or a host of other reasons we wouldn’t even consider because we’ve never been in that position.

It’s never give the benefit of the doubt here any more and every statement that one doesn’t agree with is an attack on my team. Not saying this is where you are, but it's a dangerous place to be.


If they were still collecting information, that would been the obvious thing to say. “This is an ongoing investigation with nothing specific to report at this time.”

Not, “this was not a terrorist event.”

The FBI has a long way to go before they earn back the benefit of the doubt. Jumping in front of a camera to immediately proclaim the man who just murdered a bunch of people, while carrying IEDs and flying an ISIS flag is not a terrorist is not a step in the right direction towards building trust.
 
  • Like
Reactions: warrior-cat
Well now let’s not jump to conclusions about the Ft. Hood shooter. Do we really know why he killed those people? Seems like some people really trying to push a narrative there. Probably from watching too much Fox News instead of the Russia pee tape channel.


That was a “workplace incident”, if I recall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: barbourfor3
It would appear that (if it is a suicide bombing as it appears) he purposefully did it so no one would be hurt. He didn't use high explosive or shrapnel.

The trunk was filled with fuel canisters and firework mortars. Did you not see the explosion? He screwed up....the truck was essentially an armor plate barrier and that is why the body is still intact. He wanted to blow up the lobby at a minimum.
 
4 others worked with Jabbar, and are at large.

Why do I get the sense these 4 aren't his former army squad mates?

Of those 4 who don't actually exist, what do you think their demo is? Radical jihadists? Trump supporters? Pink haired commie trans activists? BLM lunatics?
 
Where are you seeing this?

All of the current reporting is that he acted alone.
Of those 4 who don't actually exist, what do you think their demo is? Radical jihadists? Trump supporters? Pink haired commie trans activists? BLM lunatics?

I actually can't find this now. It was a tweet that led to a report.

I'll learn my lesson and post them here as I find them. But there's this:


I'd say this is pretty cut and dry and Isis Terrorist attack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: berniecarbo
The initial reports, I think based on statements from the FBI, were that 4 other people were seen planting pipe bombs.

Then they backtracked. I don’t know if that’s because they’re saying there weren’t actually pipe bombs, or because those 4 people were the same people that planted the pipe bombs in DC on Jan 6.
 
To be fair to LineSki, PTI's own senator John Kennedy was telling anyone who would listen as of this morning that he had credible reports of multiple accomplices. The clips should still be on Kennedy's youtube channel. That's where I saw them this morning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LineSkiCat14
To be fair to LineSki, PTI's own senator John Kennedy was telling anyone who would listen as of this morning that he had credible reports of multiple accomplices. The clips should still be on Kennedy's youtube channel. That's where I saw them this morning.


Indeed. That guy loves to get his Elmer Fudd old ass on camera and try to go viral with some corny ass dad joke. There's changing information constantly, which really shoots a hole in all these theories that this is "cut and dry" or set "in stone."
 
Of those 4 who don't actually exist, what do you think their demo is? Radical jihadists? Trump supporters? Pink haired commie trans activists? BLM lunatics?
I have no idea if he had accomplices, but I’m 100% certain you’re taking the word of the same bureaucrats who swore that Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation.
 
Got anymore polling data to share?
So...you quoted me and chose in a thread about a terrorist act on US soil in which several Americans were killed, to play gotcha about polling from what, October? How old are you?

I'll address it so hopefully the handful of you obsessed will move on...I was incorrect. That happens in life. You make a prediction and sometimes you're correct, sometimes you're not. Every one of us has made predictions and been right but also wrong at times. Bringing that from a few months ago into this type of thread ain't the "Ha! Gotcha!" you think it is.
 
Yeah. I mean it is probably a total coincidence that he had an ISIS flag in his truck while committing an act of random violence.

Let's not rule out that he might have just really hated beignets!

It's clear that he was influenced by ISIS to commit violence but do we really believe he's a part of a terrorist cell of ISIS/ISIL, who has been predominantly stamped out since about 2016? I mean, allegedly they were able to slaughter a hundred Russians earlier this year, but I'm thinking it's the case they just take credit for any act of terror to stay relevant.

That's the bigger point here. Everyone is concerned about making sure their side doesn't look bad that they keep ignoring the actual issue. Did this guy have money problems like the Vegas shooter? A history of mental illness (likely, they all do). Was there any indication that violence was a tendency for him (also likely based on the restraining order from 2nd wife)?

When we can start answering those questions, we may get better at stopping these things. For now, though, we keep giving monkeys knives and chanting.
 
You’re never correct yet you dash into every thread spouting the same gibberish.
You quoted me, not the other way around. If you don't enjoy my posts, there's an ignore feature. Use it and move on with your day. I took time to give you a response and was treated to "you're never correct! Gibberish!" Cool. Then ignore my posts. I'll sleep just fine tonight if a stranger online doesn't really care for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IkeCat
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT