First weekend exit type team unless we can fix the lack of BBall IQ and the toughness. The SEC only had 1 loss tonight. The Gold standard wasn't Gold tonight.
STFU, it's one game and you already having us lose the first weekend? Did you see how many top 25 teams lost last week? You people are insufferableFirst weekend exit type team unless we can fix the lack of BBall IQ and the toughness. The SEC only had 1 loss tonight. The Gold standard wasn't Gold tonight.
Have a great day.STFU, it's one game and you already having us lose the first weekend? Did you see how many top 25 teams lost last week? You people are insufferable
Don’t listen to that guy. His whole existence on here is to nag people for having different opinions than his. I think the basketball IQ argument is the same as mine in not having a guy who can make a play late. Kentucky is relying on a system to get guys open, which it does but those said guys have to make a play at the end and tonight and tonight they didn’t. That’s the concern for the rest of the year and why I agree sweet 16 or first weekend feels like this teams max ability.Have a great day.
STFU, it's one game and you already having us lose the first weekend? Did you see how many top 25 teams lost last week? You people are ins
Thanks, that dude doesn't bother me. I wasn't taking shots at the team, I really like this team and the approach that Pope is taking. We have some obvious holes that Pope will have to fix/fill. Should be an interesting winter. Glad we have Pope though. Real breath of fresh air.Don’t listen to that guy. His whole existence on here is to nag people for having different opinions than his. I think the basketball IQ argument is the same as mine in not having a guy who can make a play late. Kentucky is relying on a system to get guys open, which it does but those said guys have to make a play at the end and tonight and tonight they didn’t. That’s the concern for the rest of the year and why I agree sweet 16 or first weekend feels like this teams max ability.
we didn't get outrebounded. Both teams got 44 rebounds. We were outrebounded in the first half by 10 but outrebounded them in the second half by 10.No excuse we just got out play tonight. Got out rebounded and just played a good team.
Dude, you're the guy who would have melted down after the UMass loss if this message board have been around during the '95-96 season.Clemson is not good, the ACC blows and the Cats have looked like trash most of the last three games.
Definitely reasons to be very concerned.
Clemson was the best team that took the floor for the ACC last night and hands down had the most hostile environment.Clemson is not good, the ACC blows and the Cats have looked like trash most of the last three games.
Definitely reasons to be very concerned.
Don't try logic with JFCats. We could have hit 4 more threes last night and won by 8 points and he'd still find a reason to worry.Clemson was the best team that took the floor for the ACC last night and hands down had the most hostile environment.
100 percent this. Robinson has to be better or else games like this will become more normal.Thanks, that dude doesn't bother me. I wasn't taking shots at the team, I really like this team and the approach that Pope is taking. We have some obvious holes that Pope will have to fix/fill. Should be an interesting winter. Glad we have Pope though. Real breath of fresh air.
Robinson was not the issue last night. Held his own on defense, created his shot in a few key moments, and hustled all night. It's the rogue black holes we need to tighten up asap.100 percent this. Robinson has to be better or else games like this will become more normal.
Honestly, I think everyone DID melt down after that loss.Dude, you're the guy who would have melted down after the UMass loss if this message board have been around during the '95-96 season.
Robinson has to give you more than shooting 5/13 from the floor a lot of nights, he just does.Robinson was not the issue last night. Held his own on defense, created his shot in a few key moments, and hustled all night. It's the rogue black holes we need to tighten up asap.
I would rather have had a win than the highest draw ,that Arkansas game might be tougher than i previously thoughtas well.Anyone check out Arkansas/Miami before our game?
The crowd at Clemson was on an entirely different level than the one at Miami.
We had the toughest draw of anyone in the SEC that played tonight
Arkansas shot 11-23 from three and beat a 3-5 team by three.I would rather have had a win than the highest draw ,that Arkansas game might be tougher than i previously thoughtas well.
Maybe I'm wrong but I honestly feel if Butler stays out of foul trouble we win last night going away. He was 6 out 9 for 16 points in only nineteen minutes.First weekend exit type team unless we can fix the lack of BBall IQ and the toughness. The SEC only had 1 loss tonight. The Gold standard wasn't Gold tonight.
agree, don't think Clemson is that good, and only Duke & UNC are very good in the ACC.Clemson is not good, the ACC blows and the Cats have looked like trash most of the last three games.
Definitely reasons to be very concerned.
FT shooting has been a concern of mine from day one. You can get away with it against the cupcakes, but 11 out of 18 will not get it done on the road.You can’t be an unathletic veteran team of seniors that misses FTs and wide open 3s all game and win on the road. Not happening. We had at least 15 wide ass open 3s. No excuse to miss those. We played like ass.
One of their players had 20 rebounds. Seems like we did not box out very well.we didn't get outrebounded. Both teams got 44 rebounds. We were outrebounded in the first half by 10 but outrebounded them in the second half by 10.
That's a different argument than saying we were outrebounded which is completely false. That one player was allowed to muscle, push, and go over the back all game. How many times have you ever seen someone get 20 boards and have 0 fouls called on them? To get 20 rebounds, you have to be aggressive and being aggressive leads to fouls. It wasn't the reason we lost but it certainly allowed him to pad those numbers. He also was one for however many from the field which allowed him to pad that stat line as well. If you want to say that we should have done a better job on him, then that is a fair statement. Saying we were outrebounded isn't just not fair, it is completely false.One of their players had 20 rebounds. Seems like we did not box out very well.
We had the same amount of rebounds, I believeagree, don't think Clemson is that good, and only Duke & UNC are very good in the ACC.
The last 3 games, the players have not come out playing with the "urgency" that they should.
Maybe they have been reading the headlines in the papers.........what ever the problem, they need to
return to form. Being dominated in rebounding is nothing but lack of effort, especially allowing one guy to get 20.
They could’ve rebound it better but they did not rebound usNo excuse we just got out play tonight. Got out rebounded and just played a good team.
We've sucked since WKU. But, the players still aren't trusting the offense 100 percent.Clemson is not good, the ACC blows and the Cats have looked like trash most of the last three games.
Definitely reasons to be very concerned.
Pope with actual talent will be dangerous, yes.It's average talent. It's a lot of 3rd and 4th options from former power programs, or great players from mid-major teams.
I actually think last nights game was also proof that Pope is a legit coach. Last year he got a bunch of Mormons to a 6th seed.. last night he almost takes out a soon-to-be top25 Clemson, on the road, with the typical BS whistle UK gets, and with our PG only playing half the game, and a team that's just... eh? meh? We have no go to scoring threat, no one who can create their own shot, seems we lack a good deal of athleticism, speed, and length.
I can't wait to see what he can do with some talent next year.. but this year might be bumpy. I actually wouldn't be shocked if we're a 6 or 7 seed (mostly due to SEC play) and we bow out in the 2nd round. I don't think this teams talent is all that great and I think it's clear that we're not only missing a #1 option, but possibly a #2 option.. This team is a bunch of 3's and 4s. Great fundamentals, great experience.. but not really seeing guys who can take over games. It reminds me of many of the really good mid-majors Cal would face (Like a Wofford or a Wichita St), who are very good, but just not much of a match, in the end, for our talent and athleticism.
Clemson is 22nd in Kenpom and returned 4 Major rotation guys from an E8 team. We played them to 2pts (before the final desperation foul under 2 secs) with a bad shooting performance at the line and from 3 before the They will likely also beat Duke and/or UNC at home once this season as well.agree, don't think Clemson is that good, and only Duke & UNC are very good in the ACC.
The last 3 games, the players have not come out playing with the "urgency" that they should.
Maybe they have been reading the headlines in the papers.........what ever the problem, they need to
return to form. Being dominated in rebounding is nothing but lack of effort, especially allowing one guy to get 20.
Rebounds were tied at 44. It didn’t feel that way bc we gave up so many offensive boards in the first half…but we actually held even on the boards. 60% from the line and 25% from 3 beat us….and we didn’t live by/die by the 3. Clemson shot more than we did and only hit 1 fluke banked in at the buzzed by a big man more than usNo excuse we just got out play tonight. Got out rebounded and just played a good team.