Yep and ESPN still gets paid for that, albeit I assume a smaller percentage since they don't require you to buy every ESPN channel possible to get SECN
If you stream with Sling, you pay $5 extra to get all the ESPN networks. Helluva bargain IMO.
Yep and ESPN still gets paid for that, albeit I assume a smaller percentage since they don't require you to buy every ESPN channel possible to get SECN
He is watching SAS, and SC6 and espys?My father in-law is also a staunch conservative. He also loves sports, especially college football and basketball. He doesn't give two shits about ESPN's views, and anytime we go over there and the television is on, odds are it's on an ESPN network. Me? I lean right as a fiscal conservative, but lean left as a social liberal. I couldn't possibly care less about ESPN's political views, left or right. I'm a sports nut as well, mainly college football/basketball, but love NFL/NBA/MLB as well. I'm also a cord cutter because I was tired of Charter bending me over for $185 a month for internet and cable. I went strictly to streaming, cut $100 a month off my bill, and am watching more sports than ever. I've tried to talk my FIL into doing it, but he's stubborn as hell and still pays through the nose with Charter.
It has NOTHING to do with politics. It is (1) cable cutter and (2) paying outrageous prices for rights to content.
However, you know for a fact, that "politics" is only a tiny %
So your guess is still that, after these two have said what they have said?My post literally started with the words "My guess"
He's on the left - he's not a SJW. That's why he won't suffer the same fate.
So your guess is still that, after these two have said what they have said?
Most people that start with "my guess" (with other things pointing against their guess) seem to think they are factual correct, especially when they throw numbers and/or percentages around.
Maybe I'm wrong...I am wrong a lot
Listen my man I have no clue what you are arguing. She said she thinks that politics do have an influence, and I agreed, I was just chiming in (for no other reason than I'm bored) that my guess is it's probably like 10%, but the majority is because of the changing landscape of how we get our entertainment these days. I've heard other posters on here acting like its one of the main reasons and I don't agree with that at all. If you don't agree it's all good, I'm sure we both agree that Louisville, Duke, and UNC suck.
If you think a globalist low-grade progressive who can have conversations with conservatives without screaming is worse than an SJW, then you haven't had to be on a college campus lately.There are fewer and fewer true "traditional liberal lefties" anymore and his voting pattern would say he's absolutely alt left and a modern globalist. He's making no push to reform that party back to sanity. He's worse than a SJW.
ESPN has a group of problems and politics 100% have played a role. Myself and actually many people I know ditched their package and left espn out due to their backing and promotion of Colin kaepernick over our vets.
No one knows exactly why people are scraping ESPN. You'd have to show data pertaining to WHY they are switching providers or packages / cord cutting.
I don't think it's MAINLY due to politics. But it's not helping them at all. They don't care though, ideological brainwashing and promotion of alt left propoganda is their goal. MSNBC and CNN have had terrible ratings throughout the yearswhile Fox kicks their ass. It never stopped them or even slowed them down.
If you think a globalist low-grade progressive who can have conversations with conservatives without screaming is worse than an SJW, then you haven't had to be on a college campus lately.
In my generation, the average left-winger thinks that the first amendment is overrated and that it's justified to hurt people for disagreeing with you politically.
They aren't just globalist. They aren't just sympathetic to some socialist ideas. That's small potatoes, man.
They are full-blown fascists.
It's just not on the same scale as Matt's commentary.
Yes... it's all good.Listen my man I have no clue what you are arguing. She said she thinks that politics do have an influence, and I agreed, I was just chiming in (for no other reason than I'm bored) that my guess is it's probably like 10%, but the majority is because of the changing landscape of how we get our entertainment these days. I've heard other posters on here acting like its one of the main reasons and I don't agree with that at all. If you don't agree it's all good, I'm sure we both agree that Louisville, Duke, and UNC suck.
He is watching SAS, and SC6 and espys?
KSR should learn from ESPN's mistake but Jones is probably too arrogant to think it would happen to him.
That's all true, and you make important distinctions, IMO. But we live in such a divided world now that it's either "you're with me or against me", either on my team or the other team, and those distinctions are disregarded. If you are on the other team, you are on the other team.......If you think a globalist low-grade progressive who can have conversations with conservatives without screaming is worse than an SJW, then you haven't had to be on a college campus lately.
In my generation, the average left-winger thinks that the first amendment is overrated and that it's justified to hurt people for disagreeing with you politically.
They aren't just globalist. They aren't just sympathetic to some socialist ideas. That's small potatoes, man.
They are full-blown fascists.
It's just not on the same scale as Matt's commentary.
KSR should learn from ESPN's mistake but Jones is probably too arrogant to think it would happen to him.
It's not about agree or disagree. It's about injecting politics into sports. If we wanted politics we'd watch CNN or Foxnews.Or maybe people need to grow up and stop this ignorant "well you don't agree with my views, so you're obviously dumb and I'm gonna throw a temper tantrum".
Not everyone is going to agree on everything but some people act like the world should cater to them.
The word you are looking for is not "arrogant" it is "ignorant".
Yeah, but that's letting the fascists win. It's getting to the point where you don't have to stick up for your political beliefs, you have to stick up for democracy itself. And that starts with calling out those dipshits who are burning down the birthplace of the free speech movement and arming themselves with brass knuckles in order to stop conservatives from speaking. But you need people on the left to disavow that or it'll only get worse.That's all true, and you make important distinctions, IMO. But we live in such a divided world now that it's either "you're with me or against me", either on my team or the other team, and those distinctions are disregarded. If you are on the other team, you are on the other team.......
I expect her to be shipped over to FS1 in short order
Same for me. I simply do not watch the politically oriented material. I am there to watch a game of some kind or here the commentary about games not to hear anyone left or right talk politics , sexual orientation, the environment or the future of the snail darter. I am concerned about UK's ability to score against a 3/2 trapping zone.I'm a hardline conservative. I am offended by ESPN's liberal political slant.
It has NOT affected my love for sports, and ESPN has cornered the Market.
Cord Cutters is the issue, no doubt about it.
Well said. Your Dad is my twin!My father in-law is also a staunch conservative. He also loves sports, especially college football and basketball. He doesn't give two shits about ESPN's views, and anytime we go over there and the television is on, odds are it's on an ESPN network. Me? I lean right as a fiscal conservative, but lean left as a social liberal. I couldn't possibly care less about ESPN's political views, left or right. I'm a sports nut as well, mainly college football/basketball, but love NFL/NBA/MLB as well. I'm also a cord cutter because I was tired of Charter bending me over for $185 a month for internet and cable. I went strictly to streaming, cut $100 a month off my bill, and am watching more sports than ever. I've tried to talk my FIL into doing it, but he's stubborn as hell and still pays through the nose with Charter.
Their true colors ALWAYS come out. As long as you're agreeing with them they'll give you that smug, elitist smile but, if you dare disagree or God forbid, think Conservatively....Pow! You're a redneck, Nazi, homophobe, bigot, etc.You know, I don't even vote, so do whatever, but a real assholish thing to say about Kentuckians.
Conservative = redneck!? They are a sports channel which is a fairly tame venue if you focus on the athletic aspect. If you chose to blend politics and social issues then you need to be objective and unbiased or you will lose viewers. I am from Kentucky and consider myself an educated man who leans between moderate and conservative. But to meet your slanted views I'll give you a "kiss my redneck arse "shout out.I am sure progressively slanted Disney and ESPN will be fine without the redneck population of KY. As you can tell, Matt Jones seems to be hurting severly from his liberal politics. You guys sure showed him, eh?
Jenner getting an Espy courage award isn't about his athletic prowess.by "political stance"...what exactly are people referring too? i watch a lot of espn...dont see much politic discussion going on. is it just that more black people are on air talents now?
Amen. That was a political statement clearly directed at Conservatives and it has no place in sports. What was once a prestigious and meaningful award was summarily rendered vapid and fraudulent in one night. Really no different than the Nobel Peace Prize.Jenner getting an Espy courage award isn't about his athletic prowess.
Cord cutters are mainly under the age of 30. It can't explain anywhere close to 90% of it. Although it can help given most of ESPN's issued are due to them pandering to 20 years because they are "the key demographic" and alienating older more reliable viewers in the process. Given that knowing the key demographic of thiers aren't subscribing to their service anyway, they are streaming it. Most likely illegal streamingMy guess is it's 90% cord cutters, being able to get highlights on the internet now, sports websites, streaming, etc. and 10% politics. Arguing ESPN is shrinking is due mainly to politics is like arguing that's the reason newspapers are shrinking, it's a silly argument. All cable and cable channels are shrinking and losing marketplace by the day.
Linda will be getting her walking papers any day now.
Give it time. Jones will get progressively more overt about his political views (they can't help themselves). Competitors will pop up or people will just get tired of Jones (his radio show is pretty stale IMO).. Ratings will start to decline. This will cause him to get even more "political" and "controversial" which will perpetuate the decline and eventually Jones will be gone or a shell of what he is today. I've seen it a thousand times.
It has NOTHING to do with politics. It is (1) cable cutter and (2) paying outrageous prices for rights to content.
If this movement is marginally due to political views/leans (pro Left), it seems Sage Steele would've been the first to get the boot considering her public remarks/tweets/pics and strong conservative stance.
by "political stance"...what exactly are people referring too? i watch a lot of espn...dont see much politic discussion going on. is it just that more black people are on air talents now?
Beadle does a great job and was one of the few who bashed Grayson Allen.They already booted her from the prime time NBA show in favor of loudmouth liberal Michelle Beadle.