Lil Brother Loses the 2013 Title
- Thread starter 2Adulterers
- Start date
Basically like when you were a little kid and your grandma made you go pick the switch for your whoopin'.
The problem with that is except for us (because they pollute our beautiful state with their filth) no one gives a damn about a pathetic little cheating city college beyond a shake of the head...
No worries they can just take it out of their slush fund... err... I mean, UL "Foundation"...
From what I understand, the NCAA have told them the ineligible players. They are asking UL to let them know what games they played in during that date span as the NCAA isn't wanting to review game film and look at boxscore on over 100 games.
But the banner is coming down.
But the banner is coming down.
That's not how it works. The NCAA Statistics staff has on file every box score from those years. Not like Louisville can just make up whatever games those players played in. Not sure why the NCAA can't just do the work to look it up themselves though. Sure as hell wouldn't take more than a couple hours at most no matter who did it, much less 45 days, with the statistics software. They can literally press a few buttons and the software will pull up a game log for each individual player for each season.Basically like when you were a little kid and your grandma made you go pick the switch for your whoopin'.
There is zero need to review game film for this. Every player that plays in a game shows up on the box score...
Caller on 790 KRD just said that one of the female members of the committee stated that they went "light" and could've hand down more severe punishments....wow!!
I've said many times on here that the Lil-Brothel scandal was much easier to understand than UNC. It is clear that I am correct. Sex sells and causes trouble. Its why the hammer hit harder. Mom and sis understand this one. It is exactly the same mindset of fake scandals like Duke Lacross etc.... Bad boys "abusing" females.
The banner is coming down. I can see the UL appeal reducing the number of scholarships lost potentially but the vacation of games will be tough to contest.
We know Behanan, Harrell, and Russ Smith are the three ineligible players the NCAA was referring to. Not only did they play in the 2013 title game, but they balled out as well. I believe Behanan had 15 and 12 and Smith dropped 22. That banner is gone folks
We know Behanan, Harrell, and Russ Smith are the three ineligible players the NCAA was referring to. Not only did they play in the 2013 title game, but they balled out as well. I believe Behanan had 15 and 12 and Smith dropped 22. That banner is gone folks
Russ, Montrezl, and Chane sounds like the 3...its all getting vacated.
Also Adam Lefkoe just ripped the whole school on the underdogs...he brought up the admin and they tried to change the subject...but then he pressed on his pathetic that behavior from Ramsey is and if Jurich is involved.
Also Adam Lefkoe just ripped the whole school on the underdogs...he brought up the admin and they tried to change the subject...but then he pressed on his pathetic that behavior from Ramsey is and if Jurich is involved.
I just read it as NCAA isn't going through the box scores, expects UL to.
With UL being made to report the games that they played ineligible players (which is a matter of indisputable facts)
Check
Then NCAA will then say "OK, you have admitted you played ineligible players in banner games, those banners come down"
Checkmate.
That way, UL cannot sue. Simply a legal maneuver.
And UL will phrase their official response "the players indicated by the NCAA to be ineligible played in the following games" and sure anyway.
Similar threads
