It’s crazy that there’s such a massive gap in talent and parity with the women’s game.
There’s no reason to even have a 68 team tournament with them. Check this out, the lowest seed to ever win the women’s tournament is a three seed and it has only happened three times- 1994, 1997, and 2023.
In the men’s game, you could be stacked like 2010 Kentucky or 2010 Kansas and still lose to lesser teams. That rarely happens in women’s basketball. That’s why teams like UConn and South Carolina can dominate is they simply got all of the good players to join on one team. It’s basically 2017 Warriors with KD.
That’s why all of the talk about “coaching genius” and citing championships is faulty logic. If you get all of the talent in a league that’s short on it, of course you should win. You could be the biggest coaching genius in the women's game but unless you get the recruits, no one will ever praise you.
Any theories on why the women’s game suffers from this?
There’s no reason to even have a 68 team tournament with them. Check this out, the lowest seed to ever win the women’s tournament is a three seed and it has only happened three times- 1994, 1997, and 2023.
In the men’s game, you could be stacked like 2010 Kentucky or 2010 Kansas and still lose to lesser teams. That rarely happens in women’s basketball. That’s why teams like UConn and South Carolina can dominate is they simply got all of the good players to join on one team. It’s basically 2017 Warriors with KD.
That’s why all of the talk about “coaching genius” and citing championships is faulty logic. If you get all of the talent in a league that’s short on it, of course you should win. You could be the biggest coaching genius in the women's game but unless you get the recruits, no one will ever praise you.
Any theories on why the women’s game suffers from this?
Last edited: