What Golf Tells Us About Bush Hamdan's Kentucky Offense
We don't know what Bush Hamdan's Kentucky offense will look like, but the goal is for Brock Vandagriff to keep the Cats efficient.
www.on3.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looking back at the last three years (particularly Coen’s first) you can see lots of miscommunication on the line due to our blocking scheme. How many times did we see DE’s or LB’s get into the backfield untouched when the replay shows linemen blocking in a different zone. Lots of issues, particularly on the line, due to the offensive install imo. I also wondered why we seldom used quick hitters or slants when they were there all day rather than airing out a low percentage post on 2nd and five or go away from the running game (Ark) and air it out to Brown when we were pounding it out on the ground. I don’t know what to expect from Hamdan calling plays but his concept looks to be refreshing, at least on paper.My take away is they think looking back, that Coen may have installed an offense more like what professionals can execute, and they need to get back to something more basic that can move the ball more consistently, more QB friendly, but still affords the opportunity for explosive plays at times.
Well we have a top 4-5 defense preseason, so an efficient, albeit somewhat less explosive offense, would be complimentary football. A 21-17 win is the same as a 38-35 one in the standings. If we average 6-8 yards a pass, 5 yards a run and win 8-9 games, then I'm happy as hell.Makes me wonder what an offense of dinks and dunks going to look like if you get down 2-3 scores.
Ppl love the deep ball when it connects, but the truth is that we took wayyyy too many unnecessary shots down field with low percentage fades to BBrown in down and distances of 3rd and 3 or less…or critical must get first down situations. Just wasted downs 90% of the timeMy take away is they think looking back, that Coen may have installed an offense more like what professionals can execute, and they need to get back to something more basic that can move the ball more consistently, more QB friendly, but still affords the opportunity for explosive plays at times.
Couldn’t be much slower than last yr lolIt appears we may be a quick-snap operation … !!
Is hell happy?Well we have a top 4-5 defense preseason, so an efficient, albeit somewhat less explosive offense, would be complimentary football. A 21-17 win is the same as a 38-35 one in the standings. If we average 6-8 yards a pass, 5 yards a run and win 8-9 games, then I'm happy as hell.
I'm not a believer, so it's just a colloquialism.Is hell happy?
I'm not a believer, so it's just a colloquialism.
I've never thought about it, but I like the thought experiment. "As hell" is an intensifier. Hard as hell. Hot as hell. Boring as hell. So I guess folks just added on on to funny to mean extremely funny.Whether someone is a believer or not, it is a phrase (like so many) that makes you wonder, "how did that even become a thing?"
There are tons like this one, and sometimes it's fun just to look up the origins.
I've never thought about it, but I like the thought experiment. "As hell" is an intensifier. Hard as hell. Hot as hell. Boring as hell. So I guess folks just added on on to funny to mean extremely funny.
Ismo has many funny takes on how particular words or phrases are used … like “ass”Whether someone is a believer or not, it is a phrase (like so many) that makes you wonder, "how did that even become a thing?"
There are tons like this one, and sometimes it's fun just to look up the origins.