Boom. Huggins did have some clowns on his team, Martin wasnt one. Dude played hard. You must be oneof the old guard types clearly.
Maybe if Pitino found another recruiter. After Billy D left recruiting went downhill. We lost Delk, Walker, McCarty, and Pope in 96 and replaced them with Jamaal Magliore. The next year we lost Mercer, Anderson, Epps, and Prickett, and replaced them with Michael Bradley, Myron Anthony, and Ryan Hogan. That's a huge drop off in talent so the theory that his next 4-5 years would have been the same as his previous 4-5 is seriously flawed IMO.
Boom. Huggins did have some clowns on his team, Martin wasnt one. Dude played hard. You must be oneof the old guard types clearly.
Yeah I remember the catcalls. Although there was some talent left, 1998 was shocking to say the least. Loved those guys. Turner, Evans, Padgett, Sheppard and Nazr. But no lottery picks and only Magloire became an all star.Maybe if Pitino found another recruiter. After Billy D left recruiting went downhill. We lost Delk, Walker, McCarty, and Pope in 96 and replaced them with Jamaal Magliore. The next year we lost Mercer, Anderson, Epps, and Prickett, and replaced them with Michael Bradley, Myron Anthony, and Ryan Hogan. That's a huge drop off in talent so the theory that his next 4-5 years would have been the same as his previous 4-5 is seriously flawed IMO.
Yeah I remember the catcalls. Although there was some talent left, 1998 was shocking to say the least. Loved those guys. Turner, Evans, Padgett, Sheppard and Nazr. But no lottery picks and only Magloire became an all star.
You must not be remembering 1998 then. Arizona returned all 5 starters from their 97 title team, the one that beat a more talented UK team the year before. UNC had Antawn Jamison, Vince Carter, and Brendon Haywood. Kansas had Paul Pierce, Raef Lafrentz, and Kenny Greggory I believe. Duke was loaded, all 4 of those teams would be preseason #1 most years and were clearly more talented than UK. I know it pains you to have to give Tubby credit, but we had no business winning in 98 given the number of absolutely loaded teams that year.Because back then most champions were made up of great college players, not OAD NBA all stars.
The fact that that team had Nba talents like Magloire and Nazr was huge. Then you've got another NBA guy with a good tenure in Padgett. Sheppard was a college beast who would have started anywhere. The team was actually pretty loaded.
Contrary to popuar opinion, luck doesn't win titles. The best and most determined teams do. Over half of NCAA champions over the years came out of Kentucky, Kansas, North Carolina, Duke, Indiana, Uconn and UCLA. It's not luck.
1998 is the most underrated team in our history as far as I'm concerned because of the perception that they were under talented. When pressed however, people can usually only call Duke as a team with better players. Looking back especially, I wouldn't trade rosters with even them.
You must not be remembering 1998 then. Arizona returned all 5 starters from their 97 title team, the one that beat a more talented UK team the year before. UNC had Antawn Jamison, Vince Carter, and Brendon Haywood. Kansas had Paul Pierce, Raef Lafrentz, and Kenny Greggory I believe. Duke was loaded, all 4 of those teams would be preseason #1 most years and were clearly more talented than UK. I know it pains you to have to give Tubby credit, but we had no business winning in 98 given the number of absolutely loaded teams that year.
He'll, even UConn was loaded but their team was too young back then. College basketball was a different world in 98.
What does any of that nonsense have to with the fact that he did a great job with that team, we had no business winning the title that year, and there were 4 teams clearly better than us?I wouldn't trade rosters with Arizona in 97. Unc and Duke might have been more talented on paper but we were returning older guys with final four and championship experience.
The way that team is diminished by some is ridiculous. 1998 Kentucky would win titles today with ease. People simply overlooked them because the previous years were so dominant.
I'm not going to give Tubby credit for things underserved. Those were not his players, and tubby to this day has not fielded a final four team while running his OWN system and style. In 98 we didn't play Tubby ball, so I do givr him credit for holding off on his methods and letting them play Pitino ball. He also coached a good tournament, even though the Duke game that year is overblown. Those players won that game, Tubby didn't get in their way.
Yea I'm no Tubby apologist. He's what he is. A mediocre coach that was lucky to land at UK. It's just truth.
Who are you talking to? Hopefully not me. Because yeah, I'm well aware that UNC, Duke, Kansas, and Arizona were a big 4 in 98, ahead of UK in terms of talent.You must not be remembering 1998 then. Arizona returned all 5 starters from their 97 title team, the one that beat a more talented UK team the year before. UNC had Antawn Jamison, Vince Carter, and Brendon Haywood. Kansas had Paul Pierce, Raef Lafrentz, and Kenny Greggory I believe. Duke was loaded, all 4 of those teams would be preseason #1 most years and were clearly more talented than UK. I know it pains you to have to give Tubby credit, but we had no business winning in 98 given the number of absolutely loaded teams that year.
He'll, even UConn was loaded but their team was too young back then. College basketball was a different world in 98.
From KSR.....
.
his comments following the game may force UK fans to wonder what could have been.
“As a kid, you idolize Kentucky basketball,” Martin said. “Rick Pitino was an iconic figure here, that’s who I wanted to play for then. He left and went to the Celtics, and then they brought in Tubby, so I decided to go to the University of Cincinnati.[/QUOTe
We won the National Championship.. Had Martin choose Ky Tubby would have ruined the team trying to make him the focus.
Is that yearly or over a lifetime.......the answer will determine if Im impressed or notHow about Wilt and 10,000 women, wonder if that is true?
I was talking to the person I quoted in my post. IMO, recruiting took a huge dip in 96 and 97 for multiple reasons. Yes, we were loaded, and there were Pitino/NBA rumors, but losing our #1 ace recruiter was the main reason. Just my opinion tho.Who are you talking to? Hopefully not me. Because yeah, I'm well aware that UNC, Duke, Kansas, and Arizona were a big 4 in 98, ahead of UK in terms of talent.
But you're trying to claim that UK's recruiting fell off because Donovan left. That wasn't it. UK's recruiting fell off in 96 and 97 because of a combination of a loaded roster and constant speculation about Pitino going to the NBA. Remove the second part, and UK is highly likely to be recruiting just fine in 97 (like, take William Avery and Elton Brand off that 97-98 Duke team and put them at UK).
One name you and I both forgot is Heshimu Evans. He came with Magloire for the 96-97 season, but of course had to sit out that year.
During the 96-97 season Pitino offered H.S. jr JP Blevins a scholarship so there was his backup pg beginning the 98-99 season. However Blevins had to play behind Saul for 3 yearsStupid post ^^^. I'm sure Martin had nothing against Tubby, but he didn't have a relationship with Tubby. This is ALL on Pitino, just like the fact that we couldn't get a PG and were study with Saul as PG is on Pitino. Pitino left without having a backup PG in place for Turner. Someone had to back up Turner. Saul just happened to be an adequate (mid-major level) combo guard that could backup Turner. Recruiting season was already over, so it was Saul or no one. Then other teams used his presence against us the next 3 years. That is ALL on Pitino!
LMAO I am only bout 9,998 behindIs that yearly or over a lifetime.......the answer will determine if Im impressed or not