What.. seriously? The concept is not the same because the stakes and parameters are different.
Kentucky is coming off of an NIT year when Cal moved over (he had to leave Memphis anyways). How the hell do you equate that to Durant joining a team that just made history? I get that both guys took the next step forwards, to be happy, realize their dream, etc. etc. etc.. But Cal had to work for this. Manning had to work for his. Durant saw easy street.
This is a horrifically bad take, man.
There are similarities to be fair.
Cal came to UK to be able to recruit the best of the best and win multiples titles (his words) despite proving he had the potential to win a title at Umass and at Memphis. It would be much easier to do this at UK and its not even debatable.
KD went to GS to play with the best of the best and win multiple titles (his words) despite having the potential to actually win one at OKC. Once again, a much easier path to a title.
But give credit where it's due, neither UK 2012 or GS 2017 titles happen without Cal or KD making the move.