Probably should have been ours. Love Pope and am rooting for him hard but his success is hard to ignore.If I was the IU athlete director my first call would be Bruce Pearl.
Pearl is in his 60s. If they don’t go after Beard they are…IUProbably should have been ours. Love Pope and am rooting for him hard but his success is hard to ignore.
I really think he would’ve been the first call for us but the recruiting violations which were minor and we have Mitch Barnhart as Athletic Director.Probably should have been ours. Love Pope and am rooting for him hard but his success is hard to ignore.
Stevens turned them down once and will again.The IU fans on Peegs seem unified on calling for Brad Steven's 1st. Then Chris Beard 2nd. From there it's garbled.
As Bradley will do to ALL college basketball teams that come calling. He is living the cushy life he earned.Stevens turned them down once and will again.
I guess Steven's is to them what Donovan is to alot of BBN. A possible savior.Friends in Indy are claiming a deal is done for Brad Stevens. 😂😂😂😂
And? He looks good, has a ton of energy and is at the top of his game. He and Oats are the best 2 coaches in the SEC. You don’t need a guy to coach 20 years. Rick Barnes is 6 years older and still coaching.Pearl is in his 60s. If they don’t go after Beard they are…IU
I disagree with Beard being the second best coach in the Sec.And? He looks good, has a ton of energy and is at the top of his game. He and Oats are the best 2 coaches in the SEC. You don’t need a guy to coach 20 years. Rick Barnes is 6 years older and still coaching.
Do you live in Indiana and have to listen to their insufferable asshole fans?I’m really surprised on the backlash. I have zero fear of IU but I sense others do. They are beyond irrelevant. If it makes the board happy, I hope they hire Chin Coleman.
No. And Indiana hasn’t been relevant in my entire lifetime so that could be the issueDo you live in Indiana and have to listen to their insufferable asshole fans?
Doesn’t stop their lunacy with UK is afraid of IU, hillbillies, sister lovers bullshit. So I hope they suck from now to eternity. Oh and I graduated from IU and have never cheered for them. Born in KY, lived there for part of my childhood until we ended up in Indiana. Hate everything about those aholes fans and their sports.No. And Indiana hasn’t been relevant in my entire lifetime so that could be the issue
Over some texts messages. From a flip phone.The real mistake they made was getting rid of Sampson
Goodman said yesterday that Pearl would not go to IU. I had heard back when he was mentioned as a potential candidate for UK that he was staying at Auburn so he could make his son the coach in waiting. I believe he would have crawled to Lexington. The guy can coach.If I was the IU athlete director my first call would be Bruce Pearl.
According to Matt Jones he would have likely been the UK coach but Auburn wouldn't let UK contact him.Goodman said yesterday that Pearl would not go to IU. I had heard back when he was mentioned as a potential candidate for UK that he was staying at Auburn so he could make his son the coach in waiting. I believe he would have crawled to Lexington. The guy can coach.
If I am Auburn, I wouldn't either. LOL! Auburn didn't want to go back to the Tony Barbee days.According to Matt Jones he would have likely been the UK coach but Auburn wouldn't let UK contact him.
Some IU fans would be in favor of the corpse of Knight.Bring back Knight.
Results and facts disagree.I disagree with Beard being the second best coach in the Sec.
If a 2 and 3 seed lose those games are they really competing?Those were upsets. But those were 2 and 3 seed seasons.
That’s competing.
Yes. Upsets happen. 2004 team was number one overall seed and loss to Squeaky Johnson. No one with a brain would argue that team wasn’t a title contenderIf a 2 and 3 seed lose those games are they really competing?
Depends on your definition of competing. Making it to the sweet 16 would be my definitionYes. Upsets happen. 2004 team was number one overall seed and loss to Squeaky Johnson. No one with a brain would argue that team wasn’t a title contender
Was Saint Peters a title contender in 2022?Depends on your definition of competing. Making it to the sweet 16 would be my definition
More so than we wereWas Saint Peters a title contender in 2022?
I rest my case. We have a right to have different opinions but a criteria that has 2022 Saint Peters as a title contender moreso than the 2004 Kentucky Wildcats is interesting to say the very least.More so than we were
Yes, upsets happen in the tournament all the time. That's why it's such a beloved event. "Survive and advance" is a motto in March for a reason and history is full of teams that would have been title contenders if they didn't get knocked off in a big upset in the first round. It's stupid to judge an entire season on size single elimination tournament.If a 2 and 3 seed lose those games are they really competing?
the mistake was getting rid of SampsonNo but I do think that Indiana made a big mistake firing Crean. They haven't upgraded from him their last few hires.
Not comparing 2004 vs 2022. We haven't seriously competed since 2019 as on other poster mentionedI rest my case. We have a right to have different opinions but a criteria that has 2022 Saint Peters as a title contender moreso than the 2004 Kentucky Wildcats is interesting to say the very least.