That game hurt so badThe Wisconsin game in 2015.
That game hurt so badThe Wisconsin game in 2015.
it genuinely felt like I had gotten shot in the stomach.That game hurt so bad
Winston Bennett, is that you?The obvious answer is Georgetown’84. However, many current fans have proven they lack the mental fortitude to deal with a loss like ‘15 Whisky. Given that, I guess you’d reverse ‘15. One of the most heart breaking was ‘14. That was a gutsy crew that finally learned team basketball.
It’s this 1000%2015. Nothing else is close. That broke some of our fans. That wound will never heal unless we go 40-0.
I would add Michigan 1993. That outcome pisses me off to this day.Has to be one of the title games....
1a. 1966
1b. 1975
1c. 1997
1d. 2014
2. 1992 UK-Duke
3. 2015
The question was which ONE game would you change. How do you change the next year’s result by simply changing one random game? You’d have to use that fallacy in every game you select and change results of following games and/or seasons.It’s this 1000%
first off winning the title in 97 doesn’t mean you win in 98. Totally changes the dynamics in f the 98 team and 3 praying probably would have been nearly impossible. People on here think 97 means we still win in 98 which is nit true. And winning that Wisconsin game also doesn’t give us the title in 15 but it does give us the chance to go 40-0 with one more win(which I think we get) and go down as one of the top 5 teams ever no argument from any media person, fan base, or anyone. That one hurt bad. Had a chance at immorality
I wonder about this one. Cal wins, he’s probably gone. That’s two titles in 5 years, he’d be a legend. We’d probably get the hottest coach at the time. We might be better off.2014 title game. That run to the title was the funnest stretch of games I've watched. Would've been amazing to cap it off with #9.
I was going to say this same exact game!Easy. Arizona, 1997!!!!! Three in a row!!!! You can now close this thread. 🖐😎🔥
Its not obvious? Kinda stupid to make up crap and tell it to the one person that knows the truth. And you ask that question?How so
Duke game hands downMarch the 14th 1970 in Columbus Ohio UK was playing Jacksonville in the elite 8. I was a sophomore in high school at Millersburg Military Institute in Millersburg just a few miles from Lexington. Dan Issel was the best ball player I had ever seen. He could score from anywhere or on anybody. Issel was a senior playing for a chance to go to the final four. This was his last chance to make a final four in his career at UK. I really wanted that win for Issel as much as i did for Uk. I was crushed when they lost. Issel scored 28 and had 10 rebounds when he fouled out with 10 minutes left in the game. Jacksonville had a really tall team starting 2 seven foot tall players. Three other UK players also fouled out in the game, they just has a difficult time guarding Gilmore and a guard they had (I can't remember his name but he scored a lot of points). Tom Parker kept the cats in the game but they lost 106 to 100. That team was ranked number one most of the season and were reall fun to watch. They scored 100 points or more in half of their games. Issel was just a warrior in his career at UK. If I could change the outcome and give UK and Issel that win I would. Just wondered what game loss really bothered you.
My 1st choice also. Individual years are great, but all-time victories and championships are more valuable to me. To win ANY championship game we lost (e.g. vs Texas Western, vs Connecticut, vs. Arizona, etc) would be another banner in the rafters but ONLY the 75 game adds one AND subtracts one from UCLA.What about the 75 final game. Could have taken one away from UCLA and added one to our total.
Zags just did it.You honestly think if we go to the title game at 39-0 we are losing???? No way in Hell would we have lost that game even to the Lakers.
Or that much easier. Law of Averages isn’t real but the advantage of winning tournament experience is real.
(I’ll give you there would be more pressure to handle too)
We nearly lost to Notre Dame before the Wisconsin game.
It's entirely possible we could have lost to Duke, who was also a good team that year.
The pressure of going undefeated would have been enormous.
So I’m glad you know Law of Averages isn’t a thing. The made FT settles nerves the next season and builds into the returners’ minds the idea they’ve already been a part of what it takes to win this whole thing. Maybe the coach is feeling threepeat is gonna be harder than repeat but the players are feeling “winning it all is what we do here—now it’s my turn.”You are talking to a Statistician about Law of Averages)
If you change one thing, it can change a lot more things after that. Maybe even Pitino doesn’t leave, who knows!
Yes there would have been a whole lot more pressure.
We made it to the final game, how does 1 Nazi made FT give us significantly more winning tournament experience (we had still won 11 of our last 12 tournament games). No!
The zebras wasn't about to let anyone take that one from WoodenWhat about the 75 final game. Could have taken one away from UCLA and added one to our total
I’m 37 and going with 1975 vs UCLA. Simple math. They’d be leading us 10-9 in titles now.For us 40 and under, its Wisconsin 2015
And Duke would have 4 instead of 5.92 UK-Duke.
We’d be on the *winning* side of the greatest game ever played. Probably have another title. Mash would probably have a title. The Unforgettables would probably have a title. Cawood probably would have retired calling a Cats title. Never would have had to watch that shot replayed even once.
I’m 37 and going with 1975 vs UCLA. Simple math. They’d be leading us 10-9 in titles now.
Just because that’s your choice does not make it the “obvious answer.” Your wording there yet again displays the obnoxiousness that’s made you notorious on this board.The obvious answer is Georgetown’84. However, many current fans have proven they lack the mental fortitude to deal with a loss like ‘15 Whisky. Given that, I guess you’d reverse ‘15. One of the most heart breaking was ‘14. That was a gutsy crew that finally learned team basketball.
I’ll bite. Why?Yeah but, winning 2 in a row would’ve made it that much harder to win the 3rd.
Definitely. I was at the 1997 game so I’d change that one.Has to be one of the title games....
1a. 1966
1b. 1975
1c. 1997
1d. 2014
2. 1992 UK-Duke
3. 2015
I will make a caveat to my own answer. Psychologically, the 2015 Wisconsin game has left a scar on this fanbase that is different from all the other games. And I understand that, we lost a chance at history AND a national championship that we all believe we should have had. And I think that scar is sometimes distorting the way that we view everything else that goes on with the program. We just can’t move on from this one the way we move on from other losses. And until we get another banner, we probably never will.Definitely. I was at the 1997 game so I’d change that one.
2015 Wisconsin broke our hearts.
2017 UNC made us angry.
1997 would have been awesome.
Crazy that ONE particular ref was on the whistle in both 2015 and 2017, and another with the same last name (no relation) called 1997. ALL games had their controversies.
Oh! What might have been... Go ‘Cats!
I’ll bite. Why?