ADVERTISEMENT

I Have to Give Credit to All the Negative Posters!!

I don't know, but I am sure hoping.

But we still have the same AD that sent Joker into the game against Florida his first year with TWO four stars vs Florida having over fifty four AND five stars. The FLOOD of money from the OTHER SEC ADs that supported the money cow was a great help, but it can only go so far.

When was the last time we had a big improvement in our football facilities, right after we had the TWO two win seasons?
Joker was bad, but Stoops is basically doing the same job papa brooks was doing. At least then there was a sense that we might break through. And there weren’t weekly on field discipline issues, the staff wasn’t being paid a kings ransom, there was no unearned arrogance, etc etc
 
I love paw paw, but he never had an SEC winning record, never ended a season ranked, never beat UT or UF, never got us in a Bowl south of Birmingham/Memphis, and never got us a bowl date on New Year’s Day.

Stoops has done these things.
Thank you…some people act like Brooks is a better coach simply due to the narrative that he don’t have as much talent as Stoops did

But who cares about talent level….they both had basically the same job for a long stretch and Stoops was able to attract more talent …so credit to him

But to argue Stoops has a top 12 (Penn st) and Top 18 (Iowa) finish whereas Brooks best was outside top 25 8-5 music city bowl in 2007…people just don’t live in facts. Stoops finished 10-3 twice whereas Brooks best was 8-5
 
Think 24 pts will beat Ala, SC and u6?
Those are different games so we will see how many we actually score and how many we actually need. We did not even need 24 against Miss St. We put up 21 in the first and had the game pretty much in hand midway through the 3rd, along with an injured Qb, it silly to extrapolate what the potential was had we needed it. Stoops played smart and locked down a much needed win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The-Hack
Thank you…some people act like Brooks is a better coach simply due to the narrative that he don’t have as much talent as Stoops did

But who cares about talent level….they both had basically the same job for a long stretch and Stoops was able to attract more talent …so credit to him

But to argue Stoops has a top 12 (Penn st) and Top 18 (Iowa) finish whereas Brooks best was outside top 25 8-5 music city bowl in 2007…people just don’t live in facts. Stoops finished 10-3 twice whereas Brooks best was 8-
Thank you…some people act like Brooks is a better coach simply due to the narrative that he don’t have as much talent as Stoops did

But who cares about talent level….they both had basically the same job for a long stretch and Stoops was able to attract more talent …so credit to him

But to argue Stoops has a top 12 (Penn st) and Top 18 (Iowa) finish whereas Brooks best was outside top 25 8-5 music city bowl in 2007…people just don’t live in facts. Stoops finished 10-3 twice whereas Brooks best was 8-5
Brooks was not here that long. You act like we shouldn’t see CMS compete with the elite in the league a decade into his tenure. Year 5 coming off probation Brooks was able to keep it close with Georgia (lost by 9), Florida (lost by 8) and UT (lost by 2) AND beat top ten teams in LSU/UL. When is the last time you even have stoops a chance against elite teams? We are over a decade in and he has resources and facilities brooks never dreamed of- we would not even be able to make the comparison of stoops was doing his job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blouman
I love paw paw, but he never had an SEC winning record, never ended a season ranked, never beat UT or UF, never got us in a Bowl south of Birmingham/Memphis, and never got us a bowl date on New Year’s Day.

Stoops has done these things.
He didn’t get to face off with cratered out Tennessee and Florida programs. Stoops should have done much more with the hand he was dealt- it will never be this easy again and we squandered a couple of opportunities for nice seasons. Don’t forget he leaves wins on the table every year.
 
I love paw paw, but he never had an SEC winning record, never ended a season ranked, never beat UT or UF, never got us in a Bowl south of Birmingham/Memphis, and never got us a bowl date on New Year’s Day.

Stoops has done these things.
If mark stoops had to face the 2007 Florida team right now, what do you think the spread is? Florida -13.5? Can we keep them under 50?
 
He didn’t get to face off with cratered out Tennessee and Florida programs. Stoops should have done much more with the hand he was dealt- it will never be this easy again and we squandered a couple of opportunities for nice seasons. Don’t forget he leaves wins on the table every year.
Hey bud.. what was your last screen name? Just curious?
 
The fellowship of the "pumpers' out in full force after another big victory against a ahit team whos poor coach died . Wait till next week, they will hide under a rock for a couple days and start spewing horse manure about "dis sec, it tough" and we can still beat usc and Lewisville, 10 million a year for anudder banjo bowl
 
If mark stoops had to face the 2007 Florida team right now, what do you think the spread is? Florida -13.5? Can we keep them under 50?
Lol.

Brooks couldn’t.

Nor could many!

You say Brooks wasn’t here “that long.”

He was here for 8 seasons. His eighth, a 7-6 record with a loss in 26 degree weather in Nashville. By Stoops’ sixth season, 10-3, with a win in Orlando over a ranked Penn State in 86 degree whether.

Case Closed!!
 
Brooks was not here that long. You act like we shouldn’t see CMS compete with the elite in the league a decade into his tenure. Year 5 coming off probation Brooks was able to keep it close with Georgia (lost by 9), Florida (lost by 8) and UT (lost by 2) AND beat top ten teams in LSU/UL. When is the last time you even have stoops a chance against elite teams? We are over a decade in and he has resources and facilities brooks never dreamed of- we would not even be able to make the comparison of stoops was doing his job.

So like beating top 10 Penn st in citrus

Or how about beating ranked Florida in the swamp 2018

Or how about blowing out ranked miss st in 2018

Or how about another top 15 ranked Iowa in citrus in 2021

Or how about top 20 Louisville and Lamar in 2016

Brooks was head man for seven years…so let’s not act like he didn’t have time to do what needed and the programs while solid was not flowing with talent as his recruiting was never amazing.

I don’t want to cut Brooks down as he was a solid coach but Stoops is simply a notch above I all ways. I would argue Stoops has probably done as much as he will get done and while not the level we hoped…he’s not awful and he’s certainly best we’ve been able to get in modern era. We could remove Stoops but it could get alot worse
 
  • Like
Reactions: The-Hack
Here's my view on Coach Stoops:
Has he vastly improved the UKFB program? Absolutely!
Has he coached UKFB to some monumental wins? Absolutely!
Has he stoked the fires of UKFB? Hell yes!
But...
When you're receiving 9+ MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR, you better put your BIG BOY pants on and go out there and earn it...because the NATIVES won't let you slide very long.
Coach Stoops...get to work on earning the FAT Paycheck!

For those wondering, I'm a Coach Stoops fan...but the trial period is over now.

Oh, and let me add, CMS has made it to where teams in the SEC have to pay attention to UKFB...but get to work Mark!
 
  • Like
Reactions: rudd1 and entropy13
Here's my view on Coach Stoops:
Has he vastly improved the UKFB program? Absolutely!
Has he coached UKFB to some monumental wins? Absolutely!
Has he stoked the fires of UKFB? Hell yes!
But...
When you're receiving 9+ MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR, you better put your BIG BOY pants on and go out there and earn it...because the NATIVES won't let you slide very long.
Coach Stoops...get to work on earning the FAT Paycheck!

For those wondering, I'm a Coach Stoops fan...but the trial period is over now.

Oh, and let me add, CMS has made it to where teams in the SEC have to pay attention to UKFB...but get to work Mark!

I agree completely. It's a credit to Stoops that a potential 7-5 finish is gonna be lambasted by most UK fans. I think if we finish 8 and 4 it's a good season considering the schedule but probably still leaving us all with a what if if they had been able to beat Missouri or UT.

As for the future with NIL it's only gonna get tougher in the SEC.
 
Always great to get a road win in SEC team. With that said, context is everything. The team MsU put on the field last night was the worst I’ve seen of that program since the last days of Sylvester Croom. That was a bad team we beat last night. Not all their fault, but had their starting All Sec QB and RB been available, then the game would have likely been quite a bit different. Good win but also one we should have won.

We ain’t beating Bama.

We should beat USC bc they are a mess, but you never know.

Beating a solid UL team would make me feel we like we are improving. They have a really good defense and will test us. We will be one their best opponents on their schedule. It should be a very competitive game.

Go 8-4 and I’ll feel better… otherwise treading water. Gonna get way harder next season!
U6 is 4-0 vs already bowl eligible teams while UK is 0-3 being outscored 122-61.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: entropy13
I agree completely. It's a credit to Stoops that a potential 7-5 finish is gonna be lambasted by most UK fans. I think if we finish 8 and 4 it's a good season considering the schedule but probably still leaving us all with a what if if they had been able to beat Missouri or UT.

As for the future with NIL it's only gonna get tougher in the SEC.
I agree, 8-4 should heal some wounds...but WHAT IF...

Stoops needs to clear the what ifs.
 
U6 is 4-0 vs already bowl eligible teams while UK is 0-3 being outscored 122-61.
The teams UK has lost to would all have beaten UL as well… agree?

The teams UL beat.. save maybe ND… I’m very confident UK would have beaten.

We can beat UL and still feel very confident about that game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The-Hack
I don’t want us to lose. I’m a passionate fan. Just don’t think Bama is a good matchup for us.
The people that are ok with the losses and pump sunshine and spread toxic positivity are the ones that want us to lose. They all are secret UT and Bama fans most likely. Almost like they love the status quo of uk fb suckin hind teet!
 
I love paw paw, but he never had an SEC winning record, never ended a season ranked, never beat UT or UF, never got us in a Bowl south of Birmingham/Memphis, and never got us a bowl date on New Year’s Day.

Stoops has done these things.
He also only coached for half the time and didn’t have near the resources that Stoops has been given.
 
The teams UK has lost to would all have beaten UL as well… agree?

The teams UL beat.. save maybe ND… I’m very confident UK would have beaten.

We can beat UL and still feel very confident about that game.
Can't say l honestly agree with you because l don't spend time watching u6, but the four they have beaten were beaten pretty handly. I would throw out Georgia, but the rest l don't know.
 
Last edited:
Threads like these are just breeding grounds for everyone's singular, individual version of "I'm better than you because I believe _________."

Nobody shoots their own wounded like UK fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: R.O.T.Muckinfush
Those are different games so we will see how many we actually score and how many we actually need. We did not even need 24 against Miss St. We put up 21 in the first and had the game pretty much in hand midway through the 3rd, along with an injured Qb, it silly to extrapolate what the potential was had we needed it. Stoops played smart and locked down a much needed win.
So you think MSU deserves to be in this conversation for revelance? UT, Georgia and Missouri outscored UK 122-61 That's a rough average of 40-20. If you're counting on 24 even having UK close I'm afraid you're going to be very disappointed.
 
I’m 31 years old and Rich Brooks had the best UK team of my lifetime and that was in 2007.

That team from top the bottom would destroy any Mark Stoops team. Stoops will NEVER beat not only a #1 team but an eventual national champion.

Knocked off top 10 Louisville and gave Florida everything they could handle and yes it was the good Urban Meyer Florida not Dan Mullen or Billy Napier Florida.

If not for injuries that team would’ve done something special. And Brooks was here for a lot less of time.
 
So let me get this straight- don't point out things are not positive in the present, but it's OK to trash the past. Got it.
 
I’m 31 years old and Rich Brooks had the best UK team of my lifetime and that was in 2007.

That team from top the bottom would destroy any Mark Stoops team. Stoops will NEVER beat not only a #1 team but an eventual national champion.

Knocked off top 10 Louisville and gave Florida everything they could handle and yes it was the good Urban Meyer Florida not Dan Mullen or Billy Napier Florida.

If not for injuries that team would’ve done something special. And Brooks was here for a lot less of time.
With FAR less financial support.
 
The Board reminds me of a Moose Lodge where the new guy moves into town, wanders in and the members are quick to let him know that their opinion and their views are the only thing that matters in the Lodge. The members are dying off, they need new members but only want those who will bow down. So yes I agree, there are hypocrites here. I watched the game last night. I saw the same Kentucky team I have seen all my life. Undisciplined, very poorly managed, make the same mistakes again and again. Yes Kentucky won, but there was nothing on display last night that makes me think they are any more pepared to face Alabama, South Carolina on the road, and a Louisville team that has had this game circled on their calendar for a year. I beleived this program has made progress under CMS but it bothers me to see the same mistakes made in year 11 that they were making in year 1. Mistakes that cannot happen against good teams. It can be done here. Missouri is a prime example that other schools besides Florida, Alabama, Georgia and LSU can compete in this league. Reaching into the portal for a starting quarterback is not a move we need to be making every year. The portal and what it brings, really hurts schools trying to build a program. I wish some controls could be set in place there.
Perfect. Simply perfect summation of this entire board.
 
  • Love
Reactions: R.O.T.Muckinfush
-I think it's cute that people think they can "demand excellence"... and somehow just through the force of their gargantuan will...it will happen.

-the cats have lost games to #1, #14 and #16. The effort against ga and mizz was atrocious... ewe t game was better effort wise, the first two offensive possessions killed them. The margin of error is still razor thin.

^I hate when my team loses. Stoops needs to do better.

-give me an example of an *sec* team that started at *zero* in regards to coaching/talent/admin support...that has done better than where uk is at now. It doesn't exist.

^again... improvement needs to happen. But not acknowledging how far UK has come is stupid.

-losers pointing west at city college as an example of anything are delusional. The ACC is a very bad conference... notre dame was living off "almost beating" ohio. Cats will win that game by 2 scores minimum.
 
-I think it's cute that people think they can "demand excellence"... and somehow just through the force of their gargantuan will...it will happen.

-the cats have lost games to #1, #14 and #16. The effort against ga and mizz was atrocious... ewe t game was better effort wise, the first two offensive possessions killed them. The margin of error is still razor thin.

^I hate when my team loses. Stoops needs to do better.

-give me an example of an *sec* team that started at *zero* in regards to coaching/talent/admin support...that has done better than where uk is at now. It doesn't exist.

^again... improvement needs to happen. But not acknowledging how far UK has come is stupid.

-losers pointing west at city college as an example of anything are delusional. The ACC is a very bad conference... notre dame was living off "almost beating" ohio. Cats will win that game by 2 scores minimum.
I’m generous I’ll give you two, Ole Miss and Missouri
 
  • Like
Reactions: sluggercatfan
-nope. We've won 7 or the last 8 or some such against mizzou.

^if you are talking about when they first entered the league and had a two year run... they had a guy named Pinkle who had been there for a decade + and had 3 big 12 division titles under his belt... meaning Mizzou had established football culture/success... then they disappeared after he left.

-are you contending that Ole Miss doesn't have a more robust football culture than UK.

^3 national titles a couple of mannings...and scads more support from their administration.

-all that said, mizzou hasn't done anything over the last 10 years that UK hasn't. Did Ole miss win the west and I missed it?

^what is making you hold them up as something to aspire to?

-I think some folks underestimate the damage Newton, Ivy, Curry and Joker did to the football program here.
 
Last edited:
-Stoops has had two 10 win seasons.

-Hows Vandy doing now? It was a magical two year stretch. A little too much rape for me...but whatevs.

-yep 10-3...followed by 8-5, having a good year this year. Should we compare UK's recruiting base/historical investment in football to that of Ole Miss?

-listen... I'm all for you guys getting into your feelings and crying on a message board, it's what fans do.

^I get down a bit when the cats lose. But I like to deal in numbers/facts. To each their own.

-yes you may keep going if you wish.
 
Last edited:
-nope. We've won 7 or the last 8 or some such against mizzou.

^if you are talking about when they first entered the league and had a two year run... they had a guy named Pinkle who had been there for a decade + and had 3 big 12 division titles under his belt... meaning Mizzou had established football culture/success... then they disappeared after he left.

-are you contending that Ole Miss doesn't have a more robust football culture than UK.

^3 national titles a couple of mannings...and scads more support from their administration.

-all that said, mizzou hasn't done anything over the last 10 years that UK hasn't. Did Ole miss win the west and I missed it?

^what is making you hold them up as something to aspire to?

-I think some folks underestimate the damage Newton, Ivy, Curry and Joker did to the football program here.
Ole Miss last championship was in 1962!!! LMAO

Go back and re-read your post. You said who’s better “now.” Missouri is better than we are “now.” In case you forgot, they just blew us out on our home field a few weeks ago.

So if Missouri and Ole Miss were already so relevant, that leaves only one other school we can compare UK to and that’s Vandy.

No Ole Miss didn’t win the West but did UK win the east? At least they compete with the Alabamas and LSU’s. We can’t even do that!

Congratulations man you’re 100% right. We are better than Vandy “now.” It must suck for them to be the worst team in the conference especially when we’re sitting so high up second to the bottom!
 
-Stoops has had two 10 win seasons.

-Hows Vandy doing now? It was a magical one year stretch. A little too much rape for me...but whatevs.

-yep 10-3...followed by 8-5, having a good year this year. Should we compare UK's recruiting base/historical investment in football to that of Ole Miss?

-listen... I'm all for you guys getting into your feelings and crying on a message board, it's what fans do.

^I get down a bit when the cats lose. But I like to deal in numbers/facts. To each their own.

-yes you may keep going if you wish.
Fact...UK'S recruiting base is as large or larger within a 500 mile radius as Ole Miss. What many REFUSE to admit here is that Stoops OFFENSIVE PHILOSOPHY is his biggest block to taking another step and he continues to refuse to change it to meet today's game.
 
-Stoops has had two 10 win seasons.

-Hows Vandy doing now? It was a magical one year stretch. A little too much rape for me...but whatevs.

-yep 10-3...followed by 8-5, having a good year this year. Should we compare UK's recruiting base/historical investment in football to that of Ole Miss?

-listen... I'm all for you guys getting into your feelings and crying on a message board, it's what fans do.

^I get down a bit when the cats lose. But I like to deal in numbers/facts. To each their own.

-yes you may keep going if you wish.

It was 2 years in a row at 9 and 4 by Franklin.

Agree with you otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rudd1
-mizzou was better *this* year... UK had won the 5 prior games, iirc. One win is not a trend.

-ole miss has a more significant cfb history/recruiting base. Is what it is.

-uga and ewe t are the only teams on uk's regular schedule that have an edge over the last 5 years. Scar, mizzou, fla, louisvile, vandy have been handled more often than not. They just broke serve at MSU to give UK the edge in that series as well.

-uga is uga... their recruiting base will be hard to overcome.

-ewe t... that's the one I hate.

-saying that vandy is the only team "looking up to uk" is an emotional response... patently false.
 
  • Love
Reactions: CaptainBoogerBuns
Fact...UK'S recruiting base is as large or larger within a 500 mile radius as Ole Miss. What many REFUSE to admit here is that Stoops OFFENSIVE PHILOSOPHY is his biggest block to taking another step and he continues to refuse to change it to meet today's game.

-KY has an 8% African American population. Mississippi has a 38% African American population.

^won't go in to why it matters..
But if you look at d1 cfb and NFL demographics, it matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: entropy13
He also only coached for half the time and didn’t have near the resources that Stoops has been given.
You keep saying this and your making up crap as usual

Brooks 7 year …and joker HCIW was his idea
Stoops 11 years

You act like one coaches two years and the other 20 years

As far as resources….sure UK has spent more with Stoops but also let’s remember sec money is way up and I’d argue just about every schools spends more then they did 15 years ago.

Here is Stoops big impact over Brooks…he does not lose a ton to middle of the road teams like usc and mizzou and Vandy at the bottom. Brooks was consistently losing those games
 
No Ole Miss didn’t win the West but did UK win the east? At least they compete with the Alabamas and LSU’s. We can’t even do that.

-I somehow missed this nugget the first time.

Uga has one the last 2 natty's. In 22 uk played them tighter than everyone but ohio st. did in the semifinal. In 21 uk played them closer than everyone but clemson(they used to be pretty good)... and Bama went 1-1 with them...hammered them in the sec final and lost by 3 fewer points in the national championship than uk did.

^that's "competing".

-also uk smoked lsu last time they played, c'mon man.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT