Sure, context matters. He's their primary perimeter shooter/scorer mostly out of necessity. It is possible his numbers would improve if he was surrounded with better players. Antonio Reeves is a good example of that. Problem is, Reeves' efficiency actually got worse after he transferred to UK. Now, THIS season has been a different story. Look at Reeves' splits from IL State and UKContext for Hubbard also matteres here as well. He wouldn’t get 20 shots every night here and most likely wouldn’t have to be the main creator here as well. So efficiency could go up while playing with better players.
So, his percentages went down across the board, except for his 3pt shooting, when he came to UK. He was definitely a volume shooter/scorer at IL State and he was their main offensive threat on a team that wasn't very good. Now, compare to this season's numbers and you could definitely make that argument. Reeves was a better shooter as a volume guy on a bad team, though. I'm just not sure how Hubbard would do in a place where he was the 3rd or 4th option. |