LOL. Yes, he was gambling that he could become entangled in a "domestic matter" and no one would report it to the Athletic Department.
But keep trying. If the utterly improbable, preposterous and almost ridiculous claim that Aaron Bradshaw played a role in fixing games or shaving points or otherwise conspiring with gamblers while at Kentucky last year can be willed into reality, you can do it.
Yea I don't know. You all are tying this up into some weird agenda or want to think I have an agenda or it's your agenda...
I really don't care about agendas. I don't care what is true so to speak. I just don't think logic is being correctly applied here.
Let's go over what we (think) we know:
- Bradshaw, reportedly, has failed to appear in court over a speeding ticket. (This by all indication is true but not related)
- Ohio State University cited Federal Laws as a reason for not giving details (if it's a local crime, why do federal laws apply)? <- This isn't a leading question, but a humble one. What federal law would prevent Ohio State from discussing a domestic charge?
- One rando on Twitter suggested an issue with a DUI and potential fatality (this apparently was fake news)
- Trilly Donovan did in fact report that Bradshaw could be caught up in a gambling investigation centered around Philly area players
- To date, there is not a single source that has rebuked connections with gambling
- Ohio State is yet to release a statement about Bradshaw and a domestic incident. This suggests they are leaking info to the media to avoid conversations of gambling spreading
So, if you agree with the above facts, how are you concluding that this does not involve gambling?