ADVERTISEMENT

Hitler Speech Translated by AI

Okay, just to clarify, because I can see how someone might construe my previous post as a defense for Hitler.

Not the case. It was only meant to be an observation about most people's knowledge of history.
 
I tried once to read Mein Kampf. It was so poorly written, it bores you to death in the first 5 pages.

Skip about, and it is the same throughout.

Very obviously the product of a deranged thinker.

This speech, full of half-truths and outright bullsh!t, though, is logically coherent, and grammatically correct.

It is the first time I have heard Hitler’s voice, tone, etc., without the distraction of accent, and his power as an orator actually comes through.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RunninRichie
I tried once to read Mein Kampf. It was so poorly written, it bores you to death in the first 5 pages.

Skip about, and it is the same throughout.

Very obviously the product of a deranged thinker.

This speech, full of half-truths and outright bullsh!t, though, is logically coherent, and grammatically correct.

It is the first time I have heard Hitler’s voice, tone, etc., without the distraction of accent, and his power as an orator actually comes through.
Hitler got power because Germans were poor and looking for an out and for someone to blame their loss in WW1 on.
 
Hitler got power because Germans were poor and looking for an out and for someone to blame their loss in WW1 on.

Yes, and more persuasive portions of his speech, above, spoke of one million German children starving to death just as 100,000 milk cows were herded to the victors of WWI.

I’m not sure of his numbers, but Germany went through very difficult times, post WWI.

His pointed reference to the Democracies’ collective failure to help the Jews was in reference to tough immigration policies in the Democracies, including the dark refusal of the US, and others to give safe haven to a large shipload of Jewish migrants, 1/3rd of whom were subsequently killed in the Holocaust, after their forced return to European countries that subsequently fell to Germany.

In the 90’s, an American-Jewish author wrote an incredible book, Hitler’s Willing Executioners, that chronicled the near universal hatred of Jews by Germans at large, citing thousands of “eliminationist”books, magazine articles, and pamphlets between 1860 and 1930.

Hitler and his Nazi’s politicked among 17 political parties until his taking over near total power in 1934. Of those 17 political parties, only one did not issue an “eliminationist” plank to solve “the Jewish Problem,” the Communist Party. Even the Socialist and Christian-based political parties openly said there was a “Jewish Problem,” and suggested they be forced to leave Germany (or be otherwise eliminated.).

Jews comprised only about 2% of the population of Germany, proper, in the 1930’s. The vast majority of the Jewish victims of the Holocaust were Poles, Russians, and other nationalities that were possessed by Germany through conquest. And hundreds of thousands of these Jews were killed by civil policemen pulled from Germany . . . men in their 40’s and 50’s who had never belonged to the Nazi Party. Of thousands of German civilian cops formed into these “Eisengruppen,” only one voice of protest was found, post-war. A cop from Hamburg wrote a letter to Himler complaining of killing innocent women and children in the East. Himler’s deeply apologetic letter is fully reproduced, apologizing for offending the cop, and sending him back to Hamburg, with full pay and retirement benefits.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RunninRichie
Speaking of the battle of berlin, has anyone heard of the breakout there? some German soldiers knew they were screwed if they surrended to the red army. Because they would be instantly shot if not tortued. So they divised a plan to breakout from the red army en-circlement and surrender to the US army a few miles away.
Except the SS, they were hardcore nazis and fought until the last man or killed themselves.

On the night of 1/2 May, most of the remnants of the Berlin garrison attempted to break out of the city centre in three different directions. Only those that went west through the Tiergarten and crossed the Charlottenbrücke (a bridge over the Havel) into Spandau succeeded in breaching Soviet lines. Only a handful of those who survived the initial breakout made it to the lines of the Western Allies—most were either killed or captured by the Red Army's outer encirclement forces west of the city.


 
Btw, worst people ever (in no particular order):
  • Hitler
  • Genghis Khan
  • Stalin
  • Mao
  • Whoever created COVID
Khan kind of gets a bad rap. He only killed people and burned cities if they refused to surrender. There were a lot of historical figures who wouldn't care if you surrendered or not. I feel like he was just a brutal man in a brutal time. He seemed to be less brutal than others of his era. Part of the reason people joined him originally was because they needed help with worse oppressors.

He was more successful at actually conquering which is why you remember his name and not the leader of some area in China or Hungary or Turkey and the Stans. The Slavs supposedly joined him willingly because the arabs were so much more brutal to them.
 
Khan kind of gets a bad rap. He only killed people and burned cities if they refused to surrender.
Oh, much better! And by the way, it was only if the ruler of the area didn’t surrender immediately. So if you were Joe Schmo chilling in your village and your mayor didn’t surrender, Khan would kill you and your sons and then rape your wife and daughters. A real saint!
 
  • Like
Reactions: hmt5000
Oh, much better! And by the way, it was only if the ruler of the area didn’t surrender immediately. So if you were Joe Schmo chilling in your village and your mayor didn’t surrender, Khan would kill you and your sons and then rape your wife and daughters. A real saint!
For sure. Just saying that that wasn't that out of line back then. The Slavic people's name means "slave". People from the south and east used to just raid that area and steal people. The Vikings weren't known for their cultural enrichment... LOL.
 
While I'm sure it'd be a real gut-buster to hear an AI reconstructed Adolf Hitler speech, YouTube algorithms can be pretty aggressive. I watched ten minutes of the Depp/Heard trial and was bombarded with random Johnny Depp interviews from the past for a week. I'd rather keep my recs on YT more lighthearted than logging on and seeing Hitler's stupid idiot face yelling in his very off-putting, harsh tone.

Everyone should watch Downfall though. Terrific movie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RunninRichie
Yes, I can. He shot himself instead of facing his crimes. He had no problem sending young boys in Berlin off to face off against combat experienced and pissed off Russian and Poles. He also had no problem killing millions of women, men, and children for simply being something he himself didn't approve of. But when it came time to pay for those crimes, he took the easy way out. I don't care how many citations he recieved for bravery in WW1.
It was definitely the easy way out, but I doubt many people guilty of the things he did would want to be captured by the enemy. As said above I’d bet it was like a last FU to the Allies that they wouldn’t get the pleasure to try him in court.
 
What’s your criteria?

Pol Pot killed up to 2 million people, that’s pretty solid.

Chiang Kai-Shek was like 10 milly. Flipping Chinese (between, he and Mao) killed 50 million of their own in 50 years. That’s incredible. That’s since like 1930 or so. Modern shit.
Definitely deserving of a mention at least. Pol Pot was a bad man. Mao usually gets all the credit for the Chinese, that’s why Kai-Shek isn’t as known.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roguemocha
Interesting to say the least, mainly because I found myself wondering how different it is from what you could hear at Harvard, or Columbia, or any “top” university this morning.

I think it’s a little dangerous. Making those kinds of speeches so easily accessible is bound to influence some people the wrong way.
People should learn from history. Unfortunately our schools have been infiltrated by activists who are turning students into the exact same thing against Americans. They aren’t teaching history, they are pushing radical agendas to young people. It’s dangerous and I’m happy these demonstrations are making national news because it’s been happening a long time and now it’s out in the open.
 
It was definitely the easy way out, but I doubt many people guilty of the things he did would want to be captured by the enemy. As said above I’d bet it was like a last FU to the Allies that they wouldn’t get the pleasure to try him in court.
True. Read somewhere Hitler confided in subordinates that he wanted to avoid victorious allies parading him though the streets and put on trial.

He was also fairly well addicted to numerous drugs at the time he committed suicide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
True. Read somewhere Hitler confided in subordinates that he wanted to avoid victorious allies parading him though the streets and put on trial.

He was also fairly well addicted to numerous drugs at the time he committed suicide.
Exactly, I think he didn’t want to be shown around like that more than anything. Being dead was just as good but to him getting taken from city to city and having to listen to everything he did wasn’t part of his plan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinTXCat
Exactly, I think he didn’t want to be shown around like that more than anything. Being dead was just as good but to him getting taken from city to city and having to listen to everything he did wasn’t part of his plan.
Doesn’t mean you don't shoot it out. You’ll die either way, one you’re a pussy that couldn’t handle the same pressure you put on your subordinates, the other you shoot it out and take the bullet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RunninRichie
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT