Those are all available on Amazon Prime along with almost everything else HBO has its coffers.Originally posted by Mashburned:
Go ahead and try to compare Netflix hits to HBO hits, buddy.
Sopranos
Wire
Curb
That is not a sentence.Originally posted by Mashburned:
how will this effect me?
How did they shoot themselves in the foot?Originally posted by TankedCat:
its not worth $15 a month - HBO just shot themselves in the foot with that pricing structure.
I'm not even sure its worth $9 a month considering many consumers get it bundled in a package now.
Negative two-ninety-nine. HBO costs $17.99 on DTV.Originally posted by Dennis Reynolds:
Isn't HBO 15 a month via your cable provider? What's the difference?
Sooooo, this would be better, no? It's $15 per month via my cable provider (RCN). I thought it was at least that much everywhere, unless you have some special intro offer.Originally posted by Beavis606:
Negative two-ninety-nine. HBO costs $17.99 on DTV.Originally posted by Dennis Reynolds:
Isn't HBO 15 a month via your cable provider? What's the difference?
because I don't think most cord cutters are going to believe their content is worth $15 a monthOriginally posted by Joey Rupption:
How did they shoot themselves in the foot?Originally posted by TankedCat:
its not worth $15 a month - HBO just shot themselves in the foot with that pricing structure.
I'm not even sure its worth $9 a month considering many consumers get it bundled in a package now.
The only market it applies to is cord cutter who don't have access to HBO any other way. It's all gravy to HBO.
The only thing HBO has to worry about is the cable companies getting butt-hurt about luring subscribers away. That's why the price point is $15.
They know what they are doing.Originally posted by Perrin75:
If they were hoping to capture a large customer base I would think that putting this everywhere possible and using their most popular current series as a draw to bring in.
And exclusivity just makes no sense, especially when they are planning on rolling it out to everyone in three months.
This isn't about purchasing a video. It's about subscribing to a service. Everyone who owns a Roku, Amazon Fire TV, etc. is subscribing to at least one service. And if they want to provide the best opportunity to make HBO that service they need to have it available to as many customers as possible while their most desired product is available. If they would have released this in January or in June with a three month exclusivity it might have made more sense, but to do this during Game of Thrones just seems moronic.Originally posted by Joey Rupption:
They know what they are doing.
iTunes video rentals still dominiate the market as Apple users are more likely to spend then Amazon, Roku, Chromecast etc.
It's the same old story (see the KSR App).
HBO can work the kinks out on their most profitable outlet before they fracture it for the scraps of every other tiny market.
What are you paying now? About $15 a month I'd bet. It's NO DIFFERENT.Originally posted by Desperado_1955:
HBO standalone will be too rich for my blood. Watch HBO maybe once a month.
Nah - this is not really like the KSR app. Not at all really. That's about advertising, and obviously, iphone users are much more valuable than teh poors who own Androids. But if you are HBO, you want to be everywhere, like Netflix is. My guess is that Apple paid them to be exclusive temporarily. That and/or it makes a statement to the cable guys to get off their asses.Originally posted by Joey Rupption:
They know what they are doing.Originally posted by Perrin75:
If they were hoping to capture a large customer base I would think that putting this everywhere possible and using their most popular current series as a draw to bring in.
And exclusivity just makes no sense, especially when they are planning on rolling it out to everyone in three months.
iTunes video rentals still dominiate the market as Apple users are more likely to spend then Amazon, Roku, Chromecast etc.
It's the same old story (see the KSR App).
HBO can work the kinks out on their most profitable outlet before they fracture it for the scraps of every other tiny market.
It was bundled. Some kind of BS way to get me to stay with a plan. I know nothing is "free" but it didn't change my plan price to let them throw it into the mix.Originally posted by Dennis Reynolds:
What are you paying now? About $15 a month I'd bet. It's NO DIFFERENT.Originally posted by Desperado_1955:
HBO standalone will be too rich for my blood. Watch HBO maybe once a month.
Yes it did.Originally posted by Desperado_1955:
It was bundled. Some kind of BS way to get me to stay with a plan. I know nothing is "free" but it didn't change my plan price to let them throw it into the mix.Originally posted by Dennis Reynolds:
What are you paying now? About $15 a month I'd bet. It's NO DIFFERENT.Originally posted by Desperado_1955:
HBO standalone will be too rich for my blood. Watch HBO maybe once a month.
Actually, in this case, no it didn't. I complained about the service I was getting, etc. They said if I would stay with them, they would throw in free home phone service and HBO, and no difference in the per month charge. I told them ok. Again, I know nothing is free, but in this case with HBO and NO HBO, the cost was the same. Now, if they were to give me $15 off my bill if I dropped HBO, I'd set the damn cable on fire telling them to take it off.Originally posted by Dennis Reynolds:
Yes it did.Originally posted by Desperado_1955:
It was bundled. Some kind of BS way to get me to stay with a plan. I know nothing is "free" but it didn't change my plan price to let them throw it into the mix.Originally posted by Dennis Reynolds:
What are you paying now? About $15 a month I'd bet. It's NO DIFFERENT.Originally posted by Desperado_1955:
HBO standalone will be too rich for my blood. Watch HBO maybe once a month.
Sling TV offers most of that right now for $25 a month ($20 for sling plus $5 for the extra ESPN Channels). I haven't tried the service but it has been getting decent reviews. The big plus is you get access to the WatchESPN app, which is probably the #1 thing holding most people back from dropping cable.Originally posted by gamecockcat:
I don't think this is going to be a game-changer. Now, if ESPN bundles their stations and charges a fee for direct service, they'll make a ton of money. If TNT/TBS/USA/FX/FXX/FOX Sports would bundle theirs, I'd buy it in a minute. With a direct ESPN bundle and that one, I'd cut the cord so damn quick. It sucks to spend $140/month to watch about 3 hours a week national programming, a couple of hours a week on TNT/TBS, etc. and sports, especially during basketball season which I watch almost none of (football a TOTALLY different story). Right now, other than Netflix and a few shows we DVR from time to time, I watch almost nothing. Lot of damn money for a bunch of stations I'll never watch and a few I only watch sporadically.