Treasury announced that Harriet Tubman would replace Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill. Why?
I understand honoring her and the sacrifices she made. Her story is a great one, but why replace Jackson's image with her's on the $20 note? With the exception of Ben Franklin, who was one of the fathers of this country, no one besides a president has been featured on paper currency in the U.S.A. I don't understand why Tubman must replace Jackson. Why not honor her in the same way they honored Susan B. Anthony or Sacajawea and commission a Dollar coin with her likeness? I just don't get this at all.
If it were just about honoring an African-American, I would've been much more in support of MLK Jr. adorning the bill instead of Tubman. I feel his struggle, message, and sacrifice is much more poignant and resoundingly stronger than Tubman's.
I understand honoring her and the sacrifices she made. Her story is a great one, but why replace Jackson's image with her's on the $20 note? With the exception of Ben Franklin, who was one of the fathers of this country, no one besides a president has been featured on paper currency in the U.S.A. I don't understand why Tubman must replace Jackson. Why not honor her in the same way they honored Susan B. Anthony or Sacajawea and commission a Dollar coin with her likeness? I just don't get this at all.
If it were just about honoring an African-American, I would've been much more in support of MLK Jr. adorning the bill instead of Tubman. I feel his struggle, message, and sacrifice is much more poignant and resoundingly stronger than Tubman's.